Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

, Volume 33, Issue 1, pp 51–56 | Cite as

The stop signal of honey bees: reconsidering its message

  • James C. Nieh


The stop signal of honey bees has long been regarded as a vibrational begging signal produced by dance followers to elicit food from waggle dancers (Esch 1964). On the basis of playback experiments and behavioral analysis, this study presents the following evidence for a different signal function. Stop signals (1) can be produced by tremble dancers, dance followers, and waggle dancers; (2) rarely elicit trophallaxis; and (3) evidently cause waggle dancers to leave the dance floor. Subsequent work by Kirchner (submitted) using vibrational playback experiments confirms the latter observation. When the colony's food storers are temporarily overwhelmed by a large nectar influx, returning foragers will search for prolonged periods before unloading food and consequently begin to tremble dance (Seeley 1992). In this study, tremble dancers were the major producer of stop signals on the dance floor. The stop signal may thus retard recruitment until balance is restored.


Major Producer Signal Function Subsequent Work Stop Signal Behavioral Analysis 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Autrum H, Schneider W (1948) Vergleichende Untersuchungen über den Erschütterungssinn der Insekten. Z Vergl Physiol 31:77–88Google Scholar
  2. Esch H (1964) Beiträge zum Problem der Entfernungsweisung in den Schwänzeltänzen der Honigbienen. Z Vergl Physiol 48: 534–546Google Scholar
  3. Frings H, Little F (1957) Reactions of honeybees in the hive to simple sounds. Science 125:122Google Scholar
  4. Frisch K von (1967) The dance language and orientation of bees. (Translated by Leigh E. Chadwick). Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MassachusettsGoogle Scholar
  5. Kirchner W (1993) The tremble dance of the honeybee. Behav Ecol Sociobiol (submitted)Google Scholar
  6. Little HF (1959) Reactions of honeybees to oscillations of known frequency. Anat Rec 134:601Google Scholar
  7. Little HF (1962) Reactions of the honey bee Apis mellifera L. to artificial sounds and vibrations of known frequencies. Ann Entomol Soc Am 55:82–89Google Scholar
  8. Michelsen A, Kirchner W, Lindauer M (1986) Sound and vibrational signals in the dance language of the honeybee, Apis mellifera. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 18:207–212Google Scholar
  9. Seeley TD (1989) Social foraging in honeybees: how nectar foragers assess their colony's nutritional status. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 24:181–199Google Scholar
  10. Seeley TD (1992) The tremble dance of the honey bee: message and meanings. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 31:375–384Google Scholar
  11. Sokal R, Rohlf FJ (1981) Biometry, 2nd edn. WH Freeman, New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • James C. Nieh
    • 1
  1. 1.Section of Neurobiology and BehaviorCornell UniversityIthacaUSA

Personalised recommendations