Advertisement

Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

, Volume 27, Issue 6, pp 447–454 | Cite as

Influence of social factors on sex ratio at birth, maternal investment and young survival in a prosimian primate

  • Martine Perret
Article

Summary

In order to determine whether social factors influence sex ratio at birth in lesser mouse lemurs, experiments were conducted during 5 successive breeding periods on 51 females. At the beginning of the breeding season, females were either isolated (I) or grouped (G) in heterosexual groups with an increasing number of females (2, 3 or 4). To ensure mating, I females were introduced in a group only during the oestrous period. After mating, both I and G females were isolated during pregnancy and lactation. Reproductive capacities of females in terms of oestrus occurrences (n = 324), impregnations (n−210), pregnancies (n = 136) or abortions (n = 38) or litter sizes (1–3 young) were affected neither by age and parity of females nor by group housing prior to conception. G females produced significantly more sons than daughters (67% males for 189 newborn) while females living alone except during the mating period demonstrated a significant inverse tendency (39.6% males for 96 newborn). Distribution of sexes in litters was statistically different from random and varied according to the shift of sex ratio at birth. In G females, the shift in the sex ratio towards males was consistent across the different groups, independent of the number of females living together, suggesting that the presence of only 1 female is sufficient to induce a bias in the sex ratio. No correlation was found between infant survival at weaning and age, parity or group housing of the mother. The maternal investment allocated to male or female newborn was similar provided the litter contained at least 1 male. In litters without males, growth and survival of female infants were significantly less. These results on sex ratio bias in captive female mouse lemurs agree with directions of bias predicted by the local resource competition model for facultative sex ratio adjustment (Clark 1978). Nevertheless, the pattern observed in mouse lemurs appears to be independent of the nutritional state of the female and of differential maternal investment.

Keywords

Mouse Lemur Group Housing Maternal Investment Ratio Bias Young Survival 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abbott D (1987) Behaviourally mediated suppression of reproduction in female primate. J Zool 213:455–470Google Scholar
  2. Altmann J, Hausfater G, Altmann SA (1988) Determinant of reproductive success in savannah baboons, Papio cynocephalus. In: Clutton-Brock TH (ed) Reproductive success. Chicago University Press, Chicago, pp 403–419Google Scholar
  3. Armitage KB (1987) Do female yellow-bellied marmots adjust the sex ratios of their offspring? Am Nat 129:501–519Google Scholar
  4. Austad SN, Sunquist ME (1986) Sex ratio manipulation in the common opossum. Nature 324:58–60Google Scholar
  5. Caley MJ, Nudds TD (1987) Sex ratio adjustment in Odocoileus: does local resource competition play a role? Am Nat 129:452–457Google Scholar
  6. Clark AB (1978) Sex ratio and local competition resource in a prosimian primate. Science 201:165–168Google Scholar
  7. Clutton-Brock TH, Iason GR (1986) Sex ratio variation in mammals. Q Rev Biol 61:339–374Google Scholar
  8. Clutton-Brock TH, Albon SD, Guinness FE (1985) Parental investment and sex differences in juvenile mortality in birds and mammals. Nature 313:131–134Google Scholar
  9. Clutton-Brock TH, Albon SD, Guinness FE (1986) Great expectations: dominance, breeding success and offspring sex ratios in red deer. Anim Behav 34:460–471Google Scholar
  10. Corbier P, Kerdelhue B, Picon R, Roffi J (1978) Changes in testicular weight and serum gonadotrophins and testosterone levels before, during and after birth in the perinatal rat. Endocrinology 103:1981–1985Google Scholar
  11. Foerg R (1982) Reproduction in Cheirogaleus medius. Folia Primatol 39:49–62Google Scholar
  12. Gosling LM (1986a) Biased sex ratio in stressed animals. Am Nat 127:893–896Google Scholar
  13. Gosling LM (1986b) Selective abortion of entire litters in the coypu: adaptive control of offspring production in relation to quality and sex. Am Nat 127:772–795Google Scholar
  14. Goodman AL, Hodgen GD (1983) The ovarian triad of the primate menstrual cycle. Rec Prog Horm Res 39:1–73Google Scholar
  15. Huck UW, Pratt NC, Labov JB, Lisk RD (1988) Effects of age and parity on litter size and offspring sex ratio in golden hamsters (Mesocricelus auratus). J Reprod Fertil 83:209–213Google Scholar
  16. James WH (1980) Time of fertilisation and sex of infants. Lancet I:1124–1126Google Scholar
  17. James WH (1985a) The sex ratio of infants born after hormonal induction of ovulation. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 92:299–301Google Scholar
  18. James WH (1985b) Sex ratio, dominance status and maternal hormone levels at the time of conception. J Theor Biol 114:505–510Google Scholar
  19. Johnson CN (1988) Dispersal and the sex ratio at birth in primates. Nature 332:726–728Google Scholar
  20. Jones WT (1988) Variation in sex ratios of bannertailed kangaroo rats in relation to population density. J Mammal 69:303–310Google Scholar
  21. Krackow S, Hoeck HN (1989) Sex ratio manipulation, maternal investment and behaviour during concurrent pregnancy and lactation in house mice. Anim Behav 37:177–186Google Scholar
  22. Labov JB, Huck UW, Vaswani P, Lisk RD (1986) Sex ratio manipulation and decreased growth of male offspring of undernourished hamsters (Mesocricetus auratus). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 18:214–249Google Scholar
  23. Lebec A (1984) Relations entre le comportement agressif du mâle microcèbe, les autres comportements et la physiologic sexuelle. Doctoral 3éme cycle, University Paris VIGoogle Scholar
  24. MacClure PA (1981) Sex biased litter reduction in food restricted wood rats, Neotoma floridana. Science 211:1058–1060Google Scholar
  25. MacFarland Sygminton M (1987) Sex ratio and maternal rank in wild spider monkeys: when daughters disperse. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 20:421–425Google Scholar
  26. MacGinley MA (1984) The adaptative value of male-biased sex ratios among stressed animals. Am Nat 124:597–599Google Scholar
  27. MacShea WJ, Madison DM (1986) Sex ratio shifts within litters of meadow voles. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 18:431–436Google Scholar
  28. Martin RD (1973) A review of the behaviour and ecology of the lesser mouse lemur (Microcebus murinus). In: Crook CD, Michael RP (eds) Ecology and behavior or primates. Academic Press, New York, pp 1–168Google Scholar
  29. Maynard Smith J (1980) A new theory of sexual investment. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 7:247–251Google Scholar
  30. Meikle DB, Tilford BL, Vessey SH (1984) Dominance rank, secondary sex ratio and reproduction of offspring in polygynous primates. Am Nat 124:173–188Google Scholar
  31. Michener GR (1980) Differential reproduction among female Richardson's ground squirrels and its relation to sex ratio. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 7:173–178Google Scholar
  32. Moore CL (1985) Sex differences in urinary odors produced by young laboratory rats (Rattus norvegicus). J Comp Psychol 99:336–341Google Scholar
  33. Moore CL, Morelli GA (1979) Mother rats interact differently with male and female offspring. J Comp Psychol 93:667–684Google Scholar
  34. Moore CL, Samonte BR (1986) Preputial glands of infant rats (Rattus norvegicus) provide chemosignals for maternal discrimination of sex. J Comp Psychol 100:76–80Google Scholar
  35. Pages-Feuillade E (1988) Modalité de l'occupation de l'espace et relations interindividuelles chez un prosimian malgache, Microcebus murinus. Folia Primatol 50:204–220Google Scholar
  36. Paul A, Thommen D (1984) Timing of birth, female reproductive success and infant sex ratio in semi free-ranging Barbary macaques (Macaca sylvana). Folia Primatol 42:2–16Google Scholar
  37. Perret M (1980) Influence de la captivité et du groupement social sur la physiologie du Microcèbe (Microcebus murinus, Cheirogalcinae, Primates). Doct Etat Université Paris XIGoogle Scholar
  38. Perret M (1982) Influence du groupement social sur la reproduction de la femelle de Microcebus murinus (Miller 1777). Z Tierpsychol 60:47–65Google Scholar
  39. Perret M (1985) Influence of social factors on seasonal variations in plasma testosterone levels of Microcebus murinus. Z Tierpsychol 69:265–280Google Scholar
  40. Perret M (1986) Social influences on oestrous cycles length and plasma progesterone concentrations in the female lesser mouse lemur (Microcebus murinus). J Reprod Fertil 77:303–311Google Scholar
  41. Petter-Rousseaux A (1975) Activité sexuelle de Microcebus murinus (Miller 1777) soumis à des régimes photopériodiques expérimentaux. Ann Biol Anim Biochem Biophys 15:503–508Google Scholar
  42. Pratt NC, Lisk RD (1989) Effects of social stress during early pregnancy on litter size and sex ratio in the golden hamster (Mesocricetus auratus). J Reprod Fertil 87:763–769Google Scholar
  43. Schaik CP, Noordwijk MA (1983) Social stress and the sex ratio of neonates and infants among non human primates. Netherlands J Zool 33:249–265Google Scholar
  44. Schilling A, Perret M (1987) Chemical signals and reproductive capacity in a male prosimian primate (Microcebus murinus). Chem Senses 12:143–158Google Scholar
  45. Silk JB (1983) Local resource competition and facultative adjustment of sex ratios in relation to competitive abilities. Am Nat 121:56–66Google Scholar
  46. Simpson MJA, Simpson AE (1982) Birth sex ratios and social rank in rhesus monkey mothers. Nature 300:440–441Google Scholar
  47. Trivers RL, Willard DE (1973) Natural selection of parental ability to vary the sex ratio of offspring. Science 179:90–92Google Scholar
  48. Verme LJ (1983) Sex ratio variation in Odocoileus: a critical review. J Wild Manag 47:573–582Google Scholar
  49. Verme LJ (1989) Maternal investment in white tailed deer. J Mammal 70:438–442Google Scholar
  50. Wright SL, Crawford CB (1988) Allocation of reproductive effort in Mus domesticus: responses of offspring sex ratio and quality to social density and food availability. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 23:357–365Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Martine Perret
    • 1
  1. 1.MNHNCNRS URA 1183 Laboratoire d'Ecologie GénéraleBrunoyFrance

Personalised recommendations