Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

, Volume 32, Issue 2, pp 127–134 | Cite as

Badges of status and the cost of aggression

  • Rufus A. Johnstone
  • Ken Norris
Article

Summary

The “badges of status” hypothesis suggests that frequency-dependent selection can maintain honest signalling of aggressiveness. Analysis of a simple ESS model reveals that this is only possible if aggressive individuals incur a cost independent of any particular fights they become involved in. Without such a cost, an honest population is vulnerable to invasion by a “modest” mutant bearing a dishonestly small badge. Analysis of a second model reveals that where individuals differ in their ability to bear the contest-independent cost of aggressiveness, badge size should reflect this ability. Under such circumstances, plumage badges which serve as honest status signals may have functional consequences beyond their role in settling contests. Thus females, when choosing a mate, could make good use of the information that plumage badges provide. Analysis of a third model shows that the existence of contest-independent benefits to badge size, such as increased mating success, is compatible with the maintenance of honest status signalling.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alexander J, Stimson WH (1988) Sex hormones and the course of parasitic infection. Parasitol Today 4:189–193Google Scholar
  2. Dawkins R, Krebs JR (1978) Animal signals: information or manipulation? In: Krebs JR, Davies NB (eds) Behavioural ecology: an evolutionary approach. Blackwell Scientific, Oxford, pp 282–309Google Scholar
  3. Eckert CG, Weatherhead PJ (1987) Ideal dominance distributions: a test using red-winged blackbirds (Agelaius phoeniceus). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 20:143–152Google Scholar
  4. Evans M, Hatchwell B (1991) An experimental study of male adornment in the scarlet-tufted malachite sunbird: I the role of pectoral tufts in territory defence. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 29:413–420Google Scholar
  5. Folstad I, Karter AJ (1992) Parasites, bright males and the immunocompetence handicap. Am Nat 139:603–622Google Scholar
  6. Grossman CJ (1985) Interactions between the gonadal steroids and the immune system. Science 227:838–840Google Scholar
  7. Hogstad O (1987) Is it expensive to be dominant? Auk 104:333–336Google Scholar
  8. Jarvi T, Bakken M (1984) The function of variation of the breast stripe of the great tit (Parus major). Anim Behav 32:590–596Google Scholar
  9. Jones IL (1990) Plumage variability functions for status signalling in least auklets. Anim Behav 39:967–975Google Scholar
  10. Maynard Smith J (1974) The theory of games and the evolution of animal conflicts. J Theor Biol 47:209–221Google Scholar
  11. Maynard Smith J (1982) Evolution and the theory of games. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  12. Maynard Smith J, Harper DGC (1988). The evolution of aggression: can selection generate variability? Phil Trans R Soc London B319:557–570Google Scholar
  13. Møller AP (1987) Variation in badge size in male house sparrows Passer domesticus: evidence for status signalling. Anim Behav 37:1637–1644Google Scholar
  14. Møller AP (1988) Badge size in the sparrow Passer domesticus: effects of intra- and inter-sexual selection. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 22:373–378Google Scholar
  15. Norris KJ (1990) The evolution of the conspicuous plumage colouration of monogamous male great tits. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 26:129–138Google Scholar
  16. Owens IPF, Hartley IR (1991) ‘Trojan sparrows’: Evolutionary consequences of dishonest invasion for the badges-of-status model. Am Nat 138:1187–1205Google Scholar
  17. Rohwer SA (1975) The social significance of avian plumage variability. Evolution 29:593–610Google Scholar
  18. Røskaft E, Rohwer S (1987) An experimental study of the function of the epaulets and the black body colour of male red-winged blackbirds. Anim Behav 35:1070–1077.Google Scholar
  19. Røskaft E et al. (1986) The relationship between social status and resting metabolic rate in great tits (Parus major) and pied flycatchers (Ficedula hypoleuca). Anim Behav 34:838–842Google Scholar
  20. Studd MV, Robertson RJ (1985) Evidence for reliable badges of status in yellow warblers (Dendroica petechia). Anim Behav 33:1102–1113Google Scholar
  21. Wedekind C (1992) Detailed information about parasites revealed by sexual ornamentation. Proc R Soc London Ser B 247:169–174Google Scholar
  22. Zuk M (1990) Reproductive strategies and disease susceptibility: an evolutionary viewpoint. Parasitol Today 6:231–233Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rufus A. Johnstone
    • 1
  • Ken Norris
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Plant SciencesSouth Parks RoadOxfordUK
  2. 2.Department of ZoologyEdward Grey InstituteSouth Parks RoadUK

Personalised recommendations