Advertisement

Journal of Molecular Evolution

, Volume 34, Issue 3, pp 201–208 | Cite as

Evolution of the common cetacean highly repetitive DNA component and the systematic position of Orcaella brevirostris

  • S. Grétarsdóttir
  • Ú. Árnason
Article

Summary

The common cetacean highly repetitive DNA component was analyzed with respect to its evolution and value for establishing phylogenetic relationships. The repeat length of the component, which is tandemly organized, is ≈ 1750 by in all cetaceans except the delphinids, in which the repeat length is ≈ 1580 bp.

The evolution of the component was studied after sequencing the component in different odontocetes representing the Delphinidae (delphinids), Monodontidae (narwhals), and Ziphiidae (beaked whales). The evolution of this component is very slow, and comparisons showed that sequence divergence among species corresponds closely to their generally accepted phylogenetic relationships and that the component evolves in a concerted manner.

The phylogenetic information obtained in this study identified the Irrawaddy dolphin (Orcaella brevirostris) as a delphinid and did not support a close relationship of this species with the Monodontidae.

Key words

Highly repetitive DNA Cetacea Evolutionary rates Molecular phylogeny 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Árnason Ú (1982) Southern blot hybridizations in cetaceans using killer whale restriction fragment as a probe. Hereditas 97:47–49Google Scholar
  2. Árnason Ú (1987) The evidence for a common ancestry of toothed and baleen whales based on studies of chromosomes and highly repetitive DNA. Kromosomo (Tokyo) 45:1479–1488Google Scholar
  3. Árnason Ú, Allderdice PW, Lien J, Widegren B (1988) Highly repetitive DNA in the baleen whale genera Balaenoptera and Megaptera. J Mol Evol 27:217–221Google Scholar
  4. Árnason Ú, Best P (1991) Phylogenetic relationships within the Mysticeti (whalebone whales) based upon studies of highly repetitive DNA in all extant species., Hereditas 114:263–269Google Scholar
  5. Árnason Ú, Höglund M, Widegren B (1984) Conservation of highly repetitive DNA in cetaceans. Chromosoma 89:238–242Google Scholar
  6. Árnason Ú, Purdom IF, Jones KW (1978) Conservation and chromosomal localization of DNA satellites in balenopterid whales. Chromosoma 66:141–159Google Scholar
  7. Árnason Ú, Widegren B (1989) Composition and chromosomal localization of cetacean highly repetitive DNA with special reference to the blue whale, Balaenoptera musculus. Chromosoma 98:323–329Google Scholar
  8. Barnes LG (1978) A review of Lophocetus and Liolithax and their relationships to the delphinoid family Kentriodontidae (Cetacea: Odontoceti). Nat Hist Mus Los Angeles Cty Sci Bull 28:1–35Google Scholar
  9. Barnes LG (1984) Fossil odontocetes (Mammalia: Cetacea) from the Almejas formation, Isla Cedros, Mexico. PaleoBios 42. 46 ppGoogle Scholar
  10. Barnes LG, Domning DP, Ray CE (1985) Status of studies on fossil marine mammals. Mar Mamm Sci 1:15–53Google Scholar
  11. Deveraux J, Haeberli P, Smithies O (1984) A comprehensive set of sequence analysis programs for the VAX. Nucleic Acids Res 12:387–395Google Scholar
  12. Dod B, Mottez E, Desmarais E, Bonhomme F, Roizés G (1989) Concerted evolution of light satellite DNA in genus Mus implies amplification and homogenization of large blocks of repeats. Mot Biol Evol 6:478–491Google Scholar
  13. Dover GA (1982) Molecular drive-a cohesive mode of species evolution. Nature 299:111–117Google Scholar
  14. Felsenstein J (1985) Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39:783–791Google Scholar
  15. Felsenstein J (1990) PHYLIP manual, version 3.3. University Herbarium, University of California, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  16. Fraser FC (1966) Comments on the Delphinoidea. In: Norris KS (ed) Whales, dolphins and porpoises. University of California Press, Berkeley, pp 7–30Google Scholar
  17. Fraser FC, Purves PE (1960) Hearing in cetaceans. Bull Br Mus (Nat Hist) Zool 7:1–140Google Scholar
  18. Hein J (1990) Unified approach to alignment and phylogenies. Methods Enzymol 183:626–645Google Scholar
  19. Heyning JE (1989) Comparative facial anatomy of beaked whales (Ziphiidae) and a systematic revision among the families of extant Odontoceti. Contrib Sci (Los Angel) 405:1–64Google Scholar
  20. Jeffreys AJ, Royle NJ, Wilson W, Wong Z (1988) Spontaneous mutation rates to new length alleles at tandem-repetitive hypervariable loci in human DNA. Nature 332:278–281Google Scholar
  21. Kasuya T (1973) Systematic consideration of Recent toothed whales based on the morpology of tympano-periotic bone. Sci Rep Whales Res Inst 25:1–103Google Scholar
  22. Lint DW, Clayton JW, Lillie WR, Postma L (1990) Evolution and systematics of beluga whale, Delphinapterus leucas, and other odontocetes: a molecular approach. Can Bull Fish Aquat Sci 224:7–22Google Scholar
  23. Mead JG (1975) Anatomy of the external nasal passages and facial complex in the Delphinidae. Smithson Contrib Zool 207:1–72Google Scholar
  24. Miklos GLG (1985) Localized highly repetitive DNA sequences in vertebrate and invertebrate genomes. In: MacIntyre RJ (ed) Molecular evolutionary genetics. Plenum, New York, pp 241–321Google Scholar
  25. Mitchell E (1970) Pigmentation pattern evolution in delphinid cetaceans: an essay on adaptive colouration. Can J Zool 48: 717–740Google Scholar
  26. Ness AR (1967) A measure of asymmetry of the skulls of odontocete whales. J Zool Lond 153:209–221Google Scholar
  27. Nishiwaki AR (1963) Taxonomic consideration on genera of Delphinidae. Sci Rep Whales Res Inst 17:93–103Google Scholar
  28. Nishiwaki AR (1964) Revision of the article “Taxonomic consideration on genera of Delphinidae.” Sci Rep Whales Res Inst 18:171–172Google Scholar
  29. Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T (1989) Molecular cloning, a laboratory manual, ed. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor NYGoogle Scholar
  30. Shimura E, Numachi KI (1987) Genetic variability and differentiation in the toothed whales. Sci Rep Whales Res Inst 38: 141–163Google Scholar
  31. Smith TF, Waterman MS (1981) Comparison of bio-sequences. Adv Appl Math 2:482–489Google Scholar
  32. Stephan W (1989) Tandem repetitive noncoding DNA: forms and forces. Mol Biol Evol 6:198–212Google Scholar
  33. Strachan T, Webb D, Dover G (1985) Transition stages of molecular drive in multi-copy DNA families in Drosophila. EMBO J 4:1701–1708Google Scholar
  34. Tabor S, Richardson CC (1987) DNA sequence analysis with a modified bacteriophage T7 DNA polymerase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 84:4767–4771Google Scholar
  35. Way JS, Willard HF (1989) Concerted evolution of alpha satellite DNA: evidence for species specificity and a general lack of sequence conservation among alphoid sequence of higher primates. Chromosoma 98:273–279Google Scholar
  36. Widegren B, Árnason Ú, Akusjärvi G (1985) Characteristics of a conserved 1.579-bp highly repetitive component in the killer whale, Orcinus orca. Mol Biol Evol 2:411–419Google Scholar
  37. Willard HF, Way JS (1987) Chromosome-specific subsets of human apha satellite DNA: analysis of sequence divergence within and between chromosomal subsets and evidence for an ancestral pentameric repeat. J Mol Evol 25:207–214Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. Grétarsdóttir
    • 1
  • Ú. Árnason
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Molecular Genetics, The Wallenberg LaboratoryUniversity of LundLundSweden

Personalised recommendations