Advertisement

Documenta Ophthalmologica

, Volume 81, Issue 3, pp 317–338 | Cite as

Lens-induced glaucoma

  • Jonathan P. Ellant
  • Stephen A. Obstbaum
Article

Abstract

The crystalline lens is implicated as a causative element in producing several forms of glaucoma. Etiologically they represent a diversity in the presentation of the glaucomatous process. These conditions include glaucoma related to: lens dislocation (ectopia lentis), lens swelling (intumescent cataract), classical pupillary block, aqueous misdirection - ciliary block, phacoanaphylaxis, lens particle, and phacolytic glaucoma. The management of elevated intraocular pressure often requires altering the intraocular relationship of anatomic structures surrounding the lens or lens removal. We will review the entities that produce these lens-induced glaucomatous conditions and suggest a rational approach to their diagnosis and treatment.

Key words

Pupillary block glaucoma ciliary block glaucoma phacolytic glaucoma 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Mapstone R. Outflow changes in normal eyes after closed-angle glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol 1977; 61: 637–640.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lowe R. Causes of shallow anterior chamber in primary angle-closure glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 1969; 67: 87–93.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lowe R. Anterior lens displacement with age. Br J Ophthalmol 1970; 54: 17–121.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lowe R. Aetiology of the anatomical basis for primary angle-closure glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol 1970; 54: 161–169.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Markowitz S, Morin D. Angle-closure glaucoma: Relation between lens thickness, anterior chamber depth and age. Can J Ophthalmol 1984; 19: 300–302.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lowe R, Clark B. Radius of curvature of the anterior lens surface. Br J Ophthalmol 1973; 57: 471–474.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fontana S, Brubaker R. Volume and depth of the anterior chamber in the normal aging human eye. Arch Ophthalmol 1980; 98: 1803–1808.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Galin M, Obstbaum S. Diagnosis and treatment of angle closure glaucoma, symposium on glaucoma. Transactions of the New Orleans Academy of Ophthalmology (CV Mosby Co), 1975: 221–237.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mapstone R. Closed-angle glaucoma: Theoretical considerations. Br J Ophthalmol 1974; 58: 36–40.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mapstone R. Angle closure mechanisms in glaucoma. Seminars in Ophthalmology 1986; 1: 35–40.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mapstone R. Acute shallowing of the anterior chamber. Br J of Ophthalmol 1981; 65: 446–451.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Epstein DL, ed. Chandler and Grant's glaucoma, 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger, 1986.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ritch R. Shields MB, Krupin T. The glaucomas. St. Louis: CV Mosby Co, 1989.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mapstone R, Clark C. Diurnal variations in the dimensions of the anterior chamber. Arch Ophthalmol 1985; 1485–1486.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Spalton DJ, Hitchings RA, Hunter PA. Atlas of clinical ophthalmology. JB Lippincott and Co, 1984.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Maddalena M. Transient myopia associated with acute glaucoma and retinal edema. Arch Ophthalmol 1968; 80: 186–188.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Saari KM. Acute glaucoma in hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome (Nephropathia Epidemica). Am J Ophthalmol 1976; 81: 455–461.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kramer P, Ritch R. The treatment of acute angle-closure glaucoma revisited. Annals Ophthalmol 1984; 16, 1101–1103.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ullman S, Wilson RP et al. Bilateral angle closure glaucoma in association with the acquired immune deficiency syndrome. Am J Ophthalmol 1986; 101, 419–424.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ueda N, Ogino N. Angle-closure glaucoma with pupillary block mechanism in cicatricial retinopathy of prematurity. Ophthalmologica (Basel) 1988; 196: 15–18.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hoskins HD, Kass M. Becker and Shaffer's diagnosis and therapy of the glaucomas, 6th ed. St. Louis: CV Mosby Co, 1989.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ritch R. Argon laser treatment for medically unresponsive attacks of angle-closure glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 1982; 94: 197–204.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Koster HR, Liebmann JM et al. Acute-closure glaucoma in a patient with AIDS successfully treated with argon laser peripheral iridoplasty. Ophthalmic Surgery 1990; 21: 501–502.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Epstein DL. Diagnosis and management of lens-induced glaucoma. Ophthalmology 1982; 89: 229–230.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Simmons R. Malignant glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol 1972; 56: 263–272.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ellis P. Malignant glaucoma occurring 16 years after successful filtering surgery. Annals Ophthamol 1984; 16: 177–179.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Mills DW, Willis NR. Malignant glaucoma: The long and short of it. Can J Ophthalmol 1978; 13: 86–88.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Hardten DR, Brown JD. Malignant glaucoma after Nd: YAG cyclophotocoagulation. Am J Ophthalmol 1991; 111: 245–247.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Weiss IS, Dieter PD. Malignant glaucoma syndrome following retinal detachment surgery. Annals Ophthalmol 1974; October: 1099–1104.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Disclafani M, Liebmann J et al. Malignant glaucoma following argon laser release of scleral flap sutures after trabeculectomy. Am J Ophthalmol 1989; November: 597–598.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Robinson A, Prialnic M et al. The onset of malignant glaucoma after prophylactic laser iridotomy. Am J Ophthalmol 1990; 110: 95–96.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Levene R. A new concept of malignant glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 1972; 87: 497–506.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Phelps CD. Angle-closure glaucoma secondary to ciliary body swelling. Arch Ophthalmol 1974; 92: 287–290.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Weiss DI, Shaffer RN. Ciliary block (malignant) glaucoma. Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol and Otolaryngol 1972; 76: 450–461.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Schwartz AL, Anderson DR. ‘Malignant glaucoma’ in an eye with no antecedant operation or miotics. Arch Ophthalmol 1975; 93: 379–381.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Fanous S, Brouillette G. Ciliary block glaucoma: Malignant glaucoma in the absence of a history of surgery and of miotic surgery. Can J Ophthalmol 1983; 18: 302–303.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Luntz MH, Rosenblatt M. Malignant glaucoma. Survey of Ophthalmol 1987; 32: 73–93.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Levene RZ. Current concepts of malignant glaucoma. Ophthalmic Surgery 1986; 17: 515–520.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Epstein DL. Experimental perfusions through the anterior and vitreous with possible relationships to malignant glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 1979; 88: 1078–1086.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Grant WM. Experimental aqueous perfusion in enucleated human eyes. Arch Ophthalmol 1963; 69: 783–801.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Chandler PA, Grant WM. Mydratic-cycloplegic therapy in malignant glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 1962; 68: 353–359.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Geyer O. et al. Malignant glaucoma after laser iridectomy. Brit J Ophthalmol 1990; 74: 576.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Romem M, Singer L. et al. Unusual course and long-term follow-up in malignant glaucoma. Annals Ophthalmol 1978; August: 1083–1085.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Herschler J. Laser shrinkage of the ciliary processes. Ophthalmology 1990; 87: 1155–1158.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Simmons RJ. Discussion of article ‘Laser shrinkage of the ciliary processes’. Ophthalmology 1990; 87: 1158–1159.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Shaffer RN. The role of vitreous detachment in aphakic and malignant glaucoma. Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol and Otolaryng. 1954; March–April: 217–231.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Chandler PA. A new operation for malignant glaucoma: A preliminary report. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 1964; 62: 408–424.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Chandler PA, Simmons RJ et al. Malignant glaucoma medical and surgical treatment. Am J Ophthalmol 1968; 66: 495–502.Google Scholar
  49. 48A.
    Momoeda S, Hayashi H, et al. Anterior Pars Plana Vitrectomy for Malignant Glaucoma. Jpn J Ophthalmol 1983; 27(1): 73–9.Google Scholar
  50. 49.
    Jay B. Glaucoma associated with spontaneous displacement of the lens. Br J Ophthalmol 1972; 56: 258–262.Google Scholar
  51. 50.
    McCulloch C. Hereditary lens dislocation with angle-closure glaucoma. Can J Ophthalmol 1979; 14: 230–234.Google Scholar
  52. 51.
    Nelson LB, Maumenee IH. Ectopia lentis. Survey of Ophthalmol 1982; 27: 143–160.Google Scholar
  53. 52.
    Townes PL. Ectopia lentis et pupillae. Arch Ophthalmol 1976; 94: 1126–1128.Google Scholar
  54. 53.
    Cross HE. Ectopia lentis et pupillae. Am J Ophthalmol 1979; 88: 381–384.Google Scholar
  55. 54.
    Goldberg MF. Clinical manifestations of ectopia lentis in 16 patients. Ophthalmology 1988; 95: 1080–1087.Google Scholar
  56. 55.
    Goldberg MF. Cytological diagnosis of phacolytic glaucoma utilizing millipore filtration of the aqueous. Br J Ophthalmol 1967; 51: 847–853.Google Scholar
  57. 56.
    Malbran ES, Coxatto JO et al. Genetic spontaneous late subluxation of the lens. Ophthalmology 1989; 96: 223–229.Google Scholar
  58. 57.
    Weingarten JB, Smoth LH. Cecil's Textbook of Medicine, 18th Ed WB Saunders and Co. 1988.Google Scholar
  59. 58.
    Dietz HC, Cutting GR et al. Marfan syndrome caused by a recurrent de novo missense mutation in the fibrillin gene. Nature 1991; 352: 337–339.Google Scholar
  60. 59.
    Burian HM, van Noorden GK, Ponseti IV. Chamber angle anomalies in systemic connective tissue disorders. Arch Ophthalmol 1960; 64: 671–680.Google Scholar
  61. 60.
    Cross HE, Jensen AD. Ocular manifestations in the Marfan syndrome and homocystinuria. Am J Ophthalmol 1973; 75: 405–420.Google Scholar
  62. 61.
    Lieberman TW, Podos SM et al. Acute glaucoma, ectopia lentis and homocystinuria. Am J Ophthalmol 1966; 1966: 252–255.Google Scholar
  63. 62.
    Jensen AD, Cross HE, Paton D. Ocular complications in the Weill-Marchesani syndrome. Am J Ophthalmol 1974; 77: 261–269.Google Scholar
  64. 63.
    Feiler-Ofry V, Stein R, Godel V. Marchesani's syndrome and chamber angle anomalies. Am J Ophthalmol 1968; 65: 862–866.Google Scholar
  65. 64.
    McGavic JS. Weill-Marchesani syndrome. Am J Ophthalmol 1966; 62: 820–823.Google Scholar
  66. 65.
    Johnston SS. Pupil-block glaucoma in homocystinuria. Br J Ophthalmol 1968, 52, 251–256.Google Scholar
  67. 66.
    Obstbaum SA. In: Collins, JF, ed., Handbook of Clinical Ophthalmology, New York: Masson Publishing, 1982: 334.Google Scholar
  68. 67.
    Ritch R, Shields MB. The secondary glaucomas. St. Louis: CV Mosby Co, 1982.Google Scholar
  69. 68.
    Flocks M, Littwin CS, Zimmerman LE. Phacolytic glaucoma: A clinicopathological study of 138 cases of glaucoma associated with hypermature cataract. Arch Ophthalmol 1955; 54: 37–45.Google Scholar
  70. 69.
    Irvine SR, Irvine Jr, AR. Lens induced uveitis and glaucoma, part I: Endophthalmitis phaco-anaphylactica. Am J Ophthalmol 1952; 35: 177–186.Google Scholar
  71. 70.
    Yanoff M, Scheie HG. Cytology of human lens aspirate: Its relationship to phacolytic glaucoma and phacoanaphylactic endotphthalmitis. Arch Ophthalmol 1968; 80: 166–170.Google Scholar
  72. 71.
    Smith ME, Zimmerman LE. Contusive angle recession in phacolytic glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 1965; 74: 799–804.Google Scholar
  73. 72.
    Epstein DL, Jedziniak JA, Grant WM. Identification of heavy molecular weight soluble protein in aqueous humor in human phacolytic glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sc 1978; 17: 398–402.Google Scholar
  74. 73.
    Epstein DL, Jedizniak J, Grant. Obstruction of aqueous outflow by lens particles and heavy molecular weight soluble proteins. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1978, 272.Google Scholar
  75. 74.
    Jedziniak JA, Kinoshita JH et al. On the presence and mechanism of formation of heavy molecular weight aggregates in human normal and cataractous lenses. Experimental Eye Research 1973; 15: 185–192.Google Scholar
  76. 75.
    Lane SS, Kopietz LA et al. Treatment of phacolytic glaucoma with extracapsular cataract extraction. Ophthalmology 1988; 95: 749–753.Google Scholar
  77. 76.
    Thach AB, Marak GE et al. Phacoanaphylactic endophthalmitis: A clinicopathologic review. International Ophthalmol 1991; 15: 271–279.Google Scholar
  78. 77.
    Perlman EM, Albert DM. Clinically unsuspected phacoanaphylaxis after ocular trauma. Arch Ophthalmol 1977; 95: 244–246.Google Scholar
  79. 78.
    Duke-Elder, Sir S., Perkins ES. System of ophthalmology, Vol. 9: Diseases of the uvea. St. Louis: CV Mosby Co, 1966.Google Scholar
  80. 79.
    Marak GE et al. Experimental lens-induced granulomatous endophthalmitis in: Modern Problems in Ophthalmology, Vol. 16: 75–79 Basel: Karger, 1976.Google Scholar
  81. 80.
    Chishti M, Henkind P. Spontaneous rupture of the anterior lens capsule (Phacoanaphylactic Endophthalmitis). Am J Ophthalmol 1970; 69: 264–270.Google Scholar
  82. 81.
    Allen JC. Sympathetic uveitis and phacoanaphylaxis. Am J Ophthalmol 1967; 63: 280–283.Google Scholar
  83. 82.
    Easom HA, Zimmerman LE. Sympathetic ophthalmia and bilateral phacoanaphylaxis. Arch Ophthalmol 1964; 72: 9–15.Google Scholar
  84. 83.
    Riise P. Endophthalmitis phacoanaphylactica. Am J Ophthalmol 1965; 60: 911–915.Google Scholar
  85. 84.
    Wohl LG et al. Pseudophakic phacoanaphylactic endophthalmitis. Ophthalmic Surgery 1986; 17: 234–237.Google Scholar
  86. 85.
    Ishikawa Y, Kawata Y Ishikawa Y. Three cases of endophthalmitis phacoanaphylactica in the fellow eye after cataract extraction. Folia Ophthalmol Japan 1977; 28: 1260–1265.Google Scholar
  87. 86.
    Apple DJ, Mamalis N et al. Phacoanaphylactic endophthalmitis associated with extracapsular cataract extraction and posterior chamber intraocular lens. Arch Ophthalmol 1984; 102: 1528–1532.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jonathan P. Ellant
    • 1
  • Stephen A. Obstbaum
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of OphthalmologyLenox Hill HospitalNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations