The Histochemical Journal

, Volume 26, Issue 9, pp 687–694 | Cite as

Deconvolution in 3-D optical microscopy

  • Peter Shaw


Fluorescent probes are becoming ever more widely used in the study of subcellular structure, and determination of their three-dimensional distributions has become very important. Confocal microscopy is now a common technique for overcoming the problem of out-of-focus flare in fluorescence imaging, but an alternative method uses digital image processing of conventional fluorescence images — a technique often termed ‘deconvolution’ or ‘restoration’. This review attempts to explain image deconvolution in a non-technical manner. It is also applicable to 3-D confocal images, and can provide a further significant improvement in clarity and interpretability of such images. Some examples of the application of image deconvolution to both conventional and confocal fluorescence images are shown.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. AGARD, D. A. & SEDAT, J. W. (1983) Three-dimensional architecture of a polythene nucleus. Nature 302, 676–81.Google Scholar
  2. AGARD, D. A., HIRAOKA, Y., SHAW, P. J. & SEDAT, J. W. (1989) Fluorescence microscopy in three dimensions. Meth. Cell Biol. 30, 353–78.Google Scholar
  3. ANDREWS, H. C. & HUNT, B. R. (1977) Digital Image Restoration. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  4. CASTLEMAN, K. R. (1979) Digital Image Processing. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  5. COX, I. J., SHEPPARD, C. J. R. & WILSON, T. (1982) Super-resolution by confocal scanning fluorescence microscopy. Optik 60, 391–6.Google Scholar
  6. Frieden, B. R. (1984) Maximum-likelihood estimates of spectra. In Deconvolution with Applications in Spectroscopy (edited by Jansson, P. A.), pp. 229–61.Google Scholar
  7. GONZALEZ, R. C. & WINTZ, P. (1977) Digital Image Processing. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Inc.Google Scholar
  8. Goodman, J. W. (1968) Introduction to Fourier Optics. p. 278. McGraw-Hill Inc.Google Scholar
  9. HIGHETT, M. I., RAWLINS, D. J. & SHAW, P. J. (1993a) Different patterns of rDNA distribution in Pisum sativum nucleoli correlate with different levels of nucleolar activity. J. Cell Sci. 104, 843–52.Google Scholar
  10. HIGHETT, M. I., BEVEN, A. F. & SHAW, P. J. (1993b) Localization of 5S genes and transcripts in Pisum sativum nuclei. J. Cell Sci. 105, 1151–8.Google Scholar
  11. HIRAOKA, Y., SEDAT, J. W. & AGARD, D. A. (1990) Determination of three-dimensional imaging properties of a light microscope system: partial confocal behaviour in epifluorescence microscopy. Biophys. J. 57, 325–33.Google Scholar
  12. HOLMES, T. J. & LIU, Y.-H. (1992) Image restoration for 2-D and 3-D fluorescence microscopy. In Visualization in Biomedical Microscopies (edited by KRIETE, A.), Weinheim, Germany: VCH.Google Scholar
  13. INOUE, S. (1989) Imaging of unresolved objects, superresolution, and precision of distance measurement, with video microscopy. Meth. Cell Biol. 30, 85–112.Google Scholar
  14. JANSSON, P. A., HUNT, R. M. & PLYLER, E. K. (1970) J. Opt. Soc. Am. 60, 596.Google Scholar
  15. Pawley, J. B. (1993) The sources of noise in three-dimensional microscopical data sets. In Three-dimensional Confocal Microscopy: Volume Investigation of Biological Specimens (edited by Stevens, J. K., Mills, L. R. & Trogadis, J. E.), Academic Press.Google Scholar
  16. SANDISON, D. R., PISTON, D. W. & WEBB, W. W. (1993) Background rejection and optimization of signal-to-noise in confocal microscopy. In Three-dimensional Confocal Microscopy: Volume Investigation of Biological Specimens (edited by STEVENS, J. K., MILLS, L. R. & TROGADIS, J. E.), New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  17. SHAW, P. J. (1993) Computer reconstruction in three-dimensional fluorescence microscopy. In Electronic Light Microscopy (edited by SHOTTON, D. M.), New York: Wiley-Liss Inc.Google Scholar
  18. SHAW, P. J. (1994) Comparison of wide-field/deconvolution and confocal microscopy for 3-D imaging. In Handbook of Biological Confocal Microscopy, 2nd edn (edited by PAWLEY, J. B.), New York: Plenum Press (in press).Google Scholar
  19. SHAW, P. J. & RAWLINS, D. J. (1991) The point spread function of a confocal microscope: its measurement and use in deconvolution of 3D data. J. Microsc. 163, 151–65.Google Scholar
  20. STOKSETH, P. A. (1969) Properties of a defocused optical system. J. Opt. Soc. Am. 59, 1314–21.Google Scholar
  21. Van De VOORT, H. T. M. & SMEULDERS, A. W. M. (1993) Acquisition, processing and visualisation of three-dimensional confocal images. In Electronic Light Microscopy (edited by SHOTTON, D. M.), New York: Wiley-Liss Inc.Google Scholar
  22. YOUNG, I. T. (1989) Image fidelity: characterizing the imaging transfer function. Meth. Cell Biol. 30, 2–47.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Chapman & Hall 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter Shaw
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Cell BiologyJohn Innes CentreNorwichUK

Personalised recommendations