Population Research and Policy Review

, Volume 15, Issue 1, pp 21–43 | Cite as

Welfare benefits and birth decisions of never-married women

  • Philip K. Robins
  • Paul Fronstin
Opportunity Structures

Abstract

For some time now, the out-of-wedlock birthrate has been increasing rapidly in the United States. This has prompted several states to propose (and in some cases, enact) legislation to deny access to higher AFDC benefits for families in which the mother gives birth while receiving AFDC. The authors investigate whether AFDC benefit levels are systematically related to the family-size decisions of never-married women. Using a bivariate probit model with state and time fixed effects, applied to Current Population Survey data for the years 1980–1988, it is found that the basic benefit level for a family of two (one adult and one child) and the incremental benefit for a second child positively affects the family size decisions of black and Hispanic women, but not of white women. The effects are concentrated among high school dropouts (no effects are found for high school graduates). The authors conclude that rather than to uniformly deny benefits to all AFDC women that bear children, a better targeted policy might be to alter the AFDC benefit structure in such a way as to encourage single mothers to complete high school. However, being a high school dropout might be a proxy for some other underlying characteristic of the woman, and encouraging women to complete high school who otherwise would not might have no effect whatsoever on nonmarital births.

Key words

Birth decisions Fertility Out-of-wedlock childbearing Welfare benefits 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Acs, G. (1993). The impact of AFDC on young women's childbearing decisions. Institute for Research on Poverty, Discussion paper No. 1011–93, University of Wisconsin-Madison.Google Scholar
  2. Allen, D.W. (1993). Welfare and the family: The Canadian experience, Journal of Labor Economics 11 (1, Pt. 2): S201-S223.Google Scholar
  3. An, C.B., Havemen, R. & Wolfe, B. (1990). The effect of childhood events and economic circumstances on teen fertility out-of-wedlock and the receipt of welfare: Estimates from a sequential decision model. Paper presented at Meetings of Population Association of America, Toronto, 1990.Google Scholar
  4. Bassi, L. Aron, L., Barnow, B.S. & Pande, A. (1990). Estimates of expenditures on children and child support guidelines. Report submitted by Lewin/ICF to the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation, US Department of Health and Human Services.Google Scholar
  5. Becker, G. (1960). An economic analysis of fertility, in A.J. Coala (ed.), Demographic and economic change in developed countries: A conference of the universities — National Bureau Committee for Economic Research, pp. 209–231. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Becker, G. (1981). A treatise on the family. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Bernstam, M.S. & Swan, P.L. (1986). The production of children as claims on the state: A comprehensive labor market approach to illegitimacy in the United States, 1960–1980. Working paper No. E-86-1. Hoover Institute, Stanford University.Google Scholar
  8. Blau, D.M. & Robins, P.K. (1989). Fertility, employment, and child care costs, Demography. 26 (2): 287–299.Google Scholar
  9. Cutright, P. (1970). AFDC, family allowances, and illegitimacy, Family Planning Perspectives 2 (4): 4–9.Google Scholar
  10. Duncan, G.J. & Hoffman, S.D. (1990). Welfare benefits, economic opportunities, and out-of-wedlock births among black teenage girls, Demography 27 (4): 519–535.Google Scholar
  11. Ellwood, D. & Bane, M.J. (1985). The impact of AFDC on family structure and living arrangements, in R. Ehrenberg (ed.), Research in labor Economics, pp. 137–207. Vol. 7, Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  12. Fraker, T. Moffitt, R. & Wolf, D. (1985). Effective tax rates and guarantees in the AFDC Program, 1967–1982, Journal of Human Resources 20 (2): 251–263.Google Scholar
  13. Freshcock, L. & Cutright, P. (1969). Models of illegitimacy: United States, 1969, Demography 16 (1): 37–47.Google Scholar
  14. Fuchs, V. (1983). How we live. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Gonul, F. (1988). An empirical analysis of the effects of AFDC on work, childbearing, and marital status decisions of young women. Unpublished manuscript, Graduate School of Industrial Administration, Carnegie Mellon University.Google Scholar
  16. Hyatt, D. & Milne, W.J. (1991). Can public policy affect fertility? Canadian Public Policy 17 (1) 77–85.Google Scholar
  17. Janowitz, B.S. (1976). The impact of AFDC on illegitimate birth rates, Journal of Marriage and the Family 38 (3): 485–494.Google Scholar
  18. Keefe, D.E. (1983). Governor Reagan, welfare reform, and AFDC fertility, Social Service Review 57 (2): 234–253.Google Scholar
  19. Lundberg, S. & Plotnick, R.D. (1990). Effects of state welfare, abortion, and family planning policies on premarital childbearing among white adolescents, Family Planning Perspectives 22 (6): 246–251.Google Scholar
  20. Lundberg, S. & Plotnick, R.D. (1995). Adolescent premarital childbearing: Do economic incentives matter? Journal of Labor Economics 13 (2): 177–200.Google Scholar
  21. Moffitt, R. (1992). Incentive effects of the US welfare system: A review, Journal of Economic Literature 30 (1): 1–61.Google Scholar
  22. Moffitt, R. (1994). Welfare effects on female headship with area effects, Journal of Human Resources 29 (2): 621–636.Google Scholar
  23. Murray, C. (1984). Losing ground: American social policy, 1950–1980. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  24. Murray, C. (1993). Welfare and the family: The US experience, Journal of Labor Economics 11 (1, Pt 2): S224-S262.Google Scholar
  25. Olsen, R. (1994). Fertility and the size of the US labor force, Journal of Economic Literature 32 (1): 60–100.Google Scholar
  26. Placek, D.S. & Hendershot, G.E. (1974). Public welfare and family planning: An empirical study of the brood sow myth, Social Problems 21 (5): 660–673.Google Scholar
  27. Plotnick, R.D. (1990). Welfare and out-of-wedlock childbearing: Evidence from the 1980s, Journal of Marriage and the Family 52 (3): 735–746.Google Scholar
  28. Polgar, S. & Hiday, V.A. (1974). The effect of an additional birth on low-income urban families, Population Studies 28: 463–471.Google Scholar
  29. Power, E.T. (1994). The impact of AFDC on birth decisions and program participation. Working paper No. 9408. Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland.Google Scholar
  30. Presser, H.B. & Salsberg, L.S. (1975). Public assistance and early family formation: Is there a pronatalist effect? Social Problems 23 (2): 226–241.Google Scholar
  31. Schultz, T.P. (1994). Marital status and fertility in the United States: Welfare and labor markets, Journal of Human Resources 29 (2): 637–669.Google Scholar
  32. Southwick Jr, L. (1978). The effect of welfare programs on family stability, Review of Social Economy 36 (1): 19–40.Google Scholar
  33. US Bureau of the Census (1993). Statistical abstract of the United States: 1993 (113th edition). Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  34. Winegarden, C.R. (1974). The fertility of AFDC women: An econometric approach, Journal of Economics and Business 26: 159–166.Google Scholar
  35. Winegarden, C.R. (1988) AFDC and illegitimacy ratios: A vector-autoregressive model, Applied Economics 20: 1589–1601.Google Scholar
  36. Wood, R.G., Bloom, D., Long, D. & Fellerath, V. (1995). Encouraging school enrollment and attendance among teenage parents on welfare: Early impacts of Ohio's LEAP Program, Children and Youth Services Review 17 (1/2): 277–308.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Philip K. Robins
    • 1
  • Paul Fronstin
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of EconomicsUniversity of Miami and Institute for Research on PovertyWashingtonUSA
  2. 2.Employee Benefit Research InstituteWashingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations