Biotechnology Techniques

, Volume 7, Issue 8, pp 609–614 | Cite as

Influence of culture conditions on the production of heterologous interleukin 1β by Kluyveromyces lactis

  • Karine Blondeau 
  • Boutur O. 
  • HeTene Boze 
  • Moulin G. 
  • Galzy P. 
Article
Received:

Summary

Under the control of the repressible PHO5 promoter, the expression of gene encoding interleukin 1β (Il1β) was derepressed when the medium was depleted of free inorganic phosphate (Pi). Maximum heterologous protein synthesis was obtained in the presence of 75 mg KH2PO4/1 (for 20 g glucose/l). The successful heterologous protein production greatly depends on nutritional culture conditions as Il1β production efficiency was increased by 83% through optimization of the growth medium. Comparison of different phosphate-limited cultivation strategies led to the development of a batch culture procedure with nutrient pulses to delay induced oxido-fermentative glucose metabolism and increase the Il1β production to 135 mg/l.

Keywords

Culture Condition Glucose Metabolism Lactis Protein Production Batch Culture 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Antier, P., Moulin, G. and Galzy, P. (1990). Process Biochem Feb., 9–13.Google Scholar
  2. Blondeau, K. (1993). thesis, E.N.S.A. Montpellier.Google Scholar
  3. Chen, X.J. and Fukuhara, H. (1988). Gene 69, 181–192.Google Scholar
  4. Chen, X.J., Saliola, M., Falcone, C., Bianchi, M.M. and Fukuara, H. (1986). Nucleic Acids Res. 14, 4471–4481.Google Scholar
  5. Das, S. and Hollenberg, S.P. (1982). Curr. Genet. 6, 123–128.Google Scholar
  6. Fiechter, A. (1984). Adv. Biochem. Eng. Biotech. 30, 7–60.Google Scholar
  7. Fleer, R., Yeh, P., Amellal, N., Maury, I., Fournier, A., Bacchetta, F., Baduel, P., Jung, G., L'Hôte, H., Becquart, J., Fukuhara, H. and Mayaux, J.F. (1991a). Bio/Technology, 9, 968–975.Google Scholar
  8. Fleer, R., Chen, X.J., Amellal, N., Yeh, P., Fournier, A., Guinet, F., Gault, N., Faucher, D., Folliard, F., Fukuhara, H. and Mayaux, J.F. (1991b). Gene 107, 285–295.Google Scholar
  9. Galzy, P. (1964) Ann. Technol. Agric. 13, 109–259.Google Scholar
  10. Heinonen, J.K. and Lahti, R.J. (1981). Anal. Biochem. 113, 313–317.Google Scholar
  11. Ito, H., Fukuda, Y., Murata, K. and Kimura, A. (1983). J. Bacteriol. 153, 163–168.Google Scholar
  12. Kregervan Rij, N.J.N. (1984). The yeast, a taxonomic study. 3th Elsevier Sci., Publishers Amsterdam, the Netherlands.Google Scholar
  13. Laemmli, U.K. (1970). Nature 227, 680–685.Google Scholar
  14. Mateles, R.I. and Battat, E. (1974). Appl. Microbiol. 28, 901–905.Google Scholar
  15. Toh-e, A., Ueda, Y., Kakimoto, S. and Oshima, Y. (1973). J. Bacteriol. 113, 727–738.Google Scholar
  16. Trinder, M.P. (1969). Ann. Clin. Biochem. 6, 24.Google Scholar
  17. Zurbriggen, B., Kühne, A.B., Kallio, P., Käppeli, O. and Fiechter, A. (1989). J. Biotechnol. 9, 273–286.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Karine Blondeau 
  • Boutur O. 
  • HeTene Boze 
  • Moulin G. 
    • 1
  • Galzy P. 
  1. 1.Chaire de Microbiologie Industrielle et de Génétique des Micro-organismes E.N.S.A.-I.N.R.A., place Pierre VialaMontpellier cedexFrance

Personalised recommendations