Policy Sciences

, Volume 13, Issue 1, pp 75–98 | Cite as

The equity effects of state school finance reforms: A methodological critique and new evidence

  • Leanna Stiefel
  • Robert Berne
Article
  • 46 Downloads

Abstract

Since 1970, over half the states have reformed their school finance systems with improvement in equity of revenue and resource distributions as one of the stated goals. While numerous studies evaluating the equity effects of these often expensive reforms have been undertaken, there remains much disagreement about how to assess the reforms' impacts. In this article, we address the problems of measuring equity effects with an emphasis on the need for multiple definitions and an understanding of the value judgments inherent in all measures of equity. Next, three methodologies that have been used to assess the equity impacts of school finance reform are critiqued. Finally, in an effort to correct shortcomings of each, a fourth methodology is developed and new empirical evidence on the effects of reform based on that methodology are presented. The article concludes with observations about the importance of the choice of a methodology with which to evaluate complex policy changes that involve value judgments about what is fair, just, and equitable.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Augenblick, J., Levin, B., McGuire, K. and Mattingly, J. (1979). School Finance Reform in the States: 1979. Denver, CO: Education Commission of the States.Google Scholar
  2. Berne, R. and Stiefel, L. (1979a). “The equity of school finance systems over time: the value judgments inherent in evaluation,” Educational Administration Quarterly 15: 14–34.Google Scholar
  3. Berne, R. and Stiefel, L. (1979b). “Concepts of equity and their relationship to state school finance plans,” Journal of Education Finance 5.Google Scholar
  4. Berne, R. and Stiefel, L. (1981). “Measuring the equity of school finance policies: a conceptual and empirical analysis,” Policy Analysis, min press.Google Scholar
  5. Berne, R., Odden, A. and Stiefel, L. (1979). Equity in School Finance. Denver: CO: Education Commission of the States.Google Scholar
  6. Brazer, H. E. and Anderson, A. P. (1976). “Michigan's School District Equalization Act of 1973: Its Background, Structure and Effects,” in E. O. Tron, (ed.), Selected Papers in School Finance, 1976. Washington, DC: U.S. Office of Education: 41–88.Google Scholar
  7. Brown, L. L., Ginsburg, A. L., Killalea, J. N., Rosthal, R. A. and Tron, E. O. (1977). “School finance reform in the seventies, achievements and failures,” Technical Analysis Paper, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation, U.S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare and Killalea Associates, Inc.Google Scholar
  8. Brown, C. L. (1978). “The adequate program for education in Georgia,” Journal of Education Finance 4: 402–411.Google Scholar
  9. Brown, L. L., Ginsburg, A. L., Killalea, J. N., Rosthal, R. A. and Tron, E. O. (1978). “School finance reform in the seventies,” Journal of Education Finance 4: 195–212.Google Scholar
  10. Callahan, J. J. and Wilken, W. H. (1976). “State school finance reform in the 1970s,” in Callahan, J. J. and Wilken W. H. (eds.), School Finance Reform: A Legislators' Handbook, Washington, DC: National Conference of State Legislators: 1–11.Google Scholar
  11. Carroll, S. J., Cox, M. and Lisowski, W. (1979). The Search for Equity in School Finance: Results from Five States. Santa Monica: Rand.Google Scholar
  12. Carroll, S. J. (1979). The Search for Equity in School Finance. Santa Monica: Rand.Google Scholar
  13. Daicoff, D. W. (1976). “An analysis of the Kansas School District Equalization Act of 1973,” in Tron, E. O. (ed.), Selected Papers in School Finance, 1976. Washington, DC: U.S. Office of Education: 1–39.Google Scholar
  14. Goertz, M. (1979). Money and education. How Far Have We Come? Financing New Jersey Education in 1979. Princeton: Education Testing Service.Google Scholar
  15. Grubb, W. N. and Michelson, S. (1974). States and Schools. Lexington: D.C. Heath and Co.Google Scholar
  16. Hansen, W. L. and Nelson, F. H. (1978). “Impact of the 1973 Wisconsin school finance reform,” in Tron, E. O. (ed.), Selected Papers in School Finance, 1978, Washington, DC: U.S. Office of Education: 111–211.Google Scholar
  17. Harris, R. (1978). “Act 59 and the prospects for reforming school finance in Pennsylvania,” Journal of Education Finance 4: 487–501.Google Scholar
  18. Hickrod, G. A., Chaudhari, R. and Hubbard, B. C. (1979). Equity Goals in Illinois School Finance: 1973–1979. Normal, IL: Center for the Study of Educational Finance, Illinois State University.Google Scholar
  19. Kmenta, J. (1971). Elements of Econometrics. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  20. Knickman, J. and Reschovsky, A. (1978). “School finance reform in New Jersey: the first two years,” 11th Annual Report, Economic Policy Council and Office of Economic Policy, Department of Treasury, State of New Jersey.Google Scholar
  21. Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law (1978), Update on Statewide School Finance Cases. Washington, DC: Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law.Google Scholar
  22. National Education Association (1975). Estimates of School Statistics. Washington, DC: National Education Association.Google Scholar
  23. Odden, A. (1978a). “Missouri's new school finance structure,” Journal of Education Finance 4: 465–475.Google Scholar
  24. Odden, A. (1978b). School Finance Reform in the States: 1978. Denver, CO: Education Commission of the States.Google Scholar
  25. Salmon, R. G. and Shotwell, R. J. (1978). “Virginia school finance reform: status quo maintained,” Journal of Education Finance 4: 524–535.Google Scholar
  26. Tron, E., (ed.) (1976). Selected Papers in School Finance, 1976. Washington, DC: U.S. Office of Education.Google Scholar
  27. Tron, E., (ed.) (1978). Selected Papers in School Finance, 1978. Washington, DC: U.S. Office of Education.Google Scholar
  28. U.S. Bureau of the Census (1970). State Government Finances in 1969. Series GF69-No. 3. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office (G.P.O.).Google Scholar
  29. U.S. Bureau of the Census (1971). Statistical Abstract of the United States: 1971, 92nd edition. Washington, DC: U.S. G.P.O.Google Scholar
  30. U.S. Bureau of the Census (1977). Statistical Abstract of the United States: 1977, 98th edition, Washington, DC: U.S. G.P.O.Google Scholar
  31. U.S. National Center for Education Statistics (1970). Statistics of Public Elementary and Secondary Day Schools, Fall 1969. Washington, DC: U.S. G.P.O.Google Scholar
  32. U.S. National Center for Education Statistics (1976). Statistics of Public Elementary and Secondary Day Schools, Fall 1975. Washington, DC: U.S. G.P.O.Google Scholar
  33. U.S. Office of Education (1972). Public School Finance Programs, 1971–72. Washington, DC: U.S. G.P.O.Google Scholar
  34. U.S. Office of Education (1976). Public School Finance Programs, 1975–76. Washington, DC: U.S. G.P.O.Google Scholar
  35. U.S. Office of Education (1973). Statistics of State School Systems, 1969–70. Washington, DC: U.S. G.P.O.Google Scholar
  36. Ward, C. V. (1978). “State support for Rhode Island Public school operations: An explanation and critique,” Journal of Education Finance 4: 502–514.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company 1981

Authors and Affiliations

  • Leanna Stiefel
    • 1
  • Robert Berne
    • 1
  1. 1.Graduate School of Public AdministrationNew York UniversityNew YorkU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations