Public Choice

, Volume 58, Issue 3, pp 285–294 | Cite as

Private sector shrinkage and the growth of industrialized economies: Reply

  • Michael L. Marlow
Article

Conclusion

Further tests and thoughts on the OECD data lead me to conclude that, if anything, my 1986 paper underestimated the magnitude of the inverse relation between economic growth and government size. If one takes the nominal-based measure of government scale, as advised by Saunders, the significance levels, coefficient magnitudes and goodness of fits improve over what I found with my initial investigation. I would suggest that Saunders reconsider his reluctance to believe that the size of the public sector is unrelated to economic growth in OECD countries over this time period.

One additional thought appears relevant to the current policy debate concerning budget deficits and economic performance within the major industrialized economies. The empirical work displayed here and in my 1986 paper suggests serious problems associated with the various proposals urging governments to raise taxes and/or ‘ease’ fiscal policy. Elsewhere, I have suggested that available empirical evidence implies that plans to increase taxes as a way out of budget deficits are plans that carry the potential for raising government spending and possibly future deficits as well. Coupled with the evidence presented here, we should also recognize the potential of tax increases to raise the level of government participation in a country and, accordingly, exert inverse influences on its future economic performance as well. As suggested in my 1986 paper, the empirical evidence may suggest the following irony: While political participants may crave larger and larger non-market resource allocations, their future ability to satisfy that craving may very well be severely constrained by the satisfaction of that same appetite.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aschauer, D.A. (1987). Net private investment and public expenditure in the United States 1953–1984. Occasional Paper SM-87-10, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago.Google Scholar
  2. Bacon, R., and Eltis, W. (1978). Britain's economic problem: Too few producers. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  3. Barth, J.R., and Bradley, M.D. (1987). The impact of government spending on economic activity. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
  4. Barth, J.R., Keleher, R., and Russek, F.S. (1987). The scale of government and economic activity. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
  5. Beck, M. (1976). The expanding public sector: Some contrary evidence. National Tax Journal 29: 15–21.Google Scholar
  6. Beck, M. (1979). Public sector growth: A real perspective. Public Finance 34: 313–356.Google Scholar
  7. Beck, M. (1985). Public expenditure, relative prices, and resource allocation. Public Finance 30: 17–34.Google Scholar
  8. Cameron, D.R. (1978). The expansion of the public economy: A comparative analysis. American Political Science Review 72: 1243–61.Google Scholar
  9. Gould, F. (1983). The development of public expenditures in Western industrialized countries: A comparative analysis. Public Finance 38: 38–69.Google Scholar
  10. Heller, P.S. (1981). Diverging trends in the shares of nominal and real government expenditures in GDP: Implications for policy. National Tax Journal 34: 61–74.Google Scholar
  11. Landau, D. (1983). Government expenditure and economic growth: A cross-country study. Southern Economic Journal 49: 783–792.Google Scholar
  12. Marlow, M.L. (1986). Private sector shrinkage and the growth of industrialized economies. Public Choice 49: 143–154.Google Scholar
  13. Marlow, M.L. (1987). Tax and spend hypothesis: Empirical evidence and implications. Unpublished paper. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  14. Marsden, K. (1983). Links between taxes and economic growth: Some empirical evidence. World Bank Staff Working Paper, No. 605, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  15. OECD. (1985). Social expenditure 1960–1990: Problems of growth and control. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  16. Orzechowski, W. (1984). International perspectives on tax policy and economic growth. Economic Outlook. Washington, DC: US Chamber of Commerce.Google Scholar
  17. Saunders, P. (1985). Public expenditure and economic performance in OECD countries. Journal of Public Policy 5: 1–21.Google Scholar
  18. Saunders, P. (1986). What can we learn from international comparisons of public sector size and economic performance? European Sociological Review 2: 52–60.Google Scholar
  19. Saunders, P. (1988). Private sector shrinkage and the growth of industrialized economies: Comment. Public Choice 58: 277–284.Google Scholar
  20. Smith, D. (1975). Public consumption and economic performance. National Westminister Bank Review 17–30.Google Scholar
  21. Weede, E. (1984). Democracy, creeping socialism, and ideological socialism in rent-seeking societies. Public Choice 44: 349–365.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael L. Marlow
    • 1
  1. 1.U.S. Department of TreasuryWashington

Personalised recommendations