Public Choice

, Volume 66, Issue 1, pp 89–97 | Cite as

The role of credible commitments in state finance

  • Barry R. Weingast
Review Article

Conclusion

Margaret Levi's Of Rule and Revenue raises a host of important problems in the theory of the state. It provides an important step in the development of a theory that combines economic and political institutions into the same framework, potentially allowing scholars to address important issues such as the divergent economic paths taken by various states. It will therefore be an important book, and warrants attention. This approach holds much promise for the development of a theory of institutional development of the state from the middle ages onward.

I have tried to sketch some additional directions for the theory to develop, pointing toward the answer of questions not directly faced by Levi — or for that matter, by much of the public choice literature: How do we explain the evolution of a predatory state into one with explicit limits on its powers? How do we explain the rise of representative institutions? Answering these questions often requires looking beyond the individual state to its international context. Competition among states, especially in the form of war, plays a key role here, and has two consequences. First, a major consequence of large-scale wars was fiscal stress. At such times, even a preditory state might agree to exchange limitations on its own powers for revenue. Second, the brief discussion of early modern Europe suggests that states with limited government might have had a financial advantage over those which were not so limited. The latter played a major role in the successful Dutch revolt against Spain and in the English defeat of France.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bates, R. (1981). Markets and States. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  2. Bates, R. and Levi, M. (Eds.) (1988). The political economy of French and English development. Politics and Society 16 (special issue).Google Scholar
  3. Bates, R. and Lien, D. (1985). A note on taxation, development, and representative government. Politics and Society 14: 53–70.Google Scholar
  4. Bien, D. (1987). Offices, corps, and a system of state credit: The uses of privilege under the Ancien Regime. In K. Baker, The French Revolution and the creation of modern political culture, Vol. 1: 89–114, Oxford: Pergamen Press.Google Scholar
  5. Brenner, R. (1982). The agrarian roots of European capitalism. Past and Present, No. 97: 16–113.Google Scholar
  6. Buchanan, J. and Brennan, G. (1981). The power to tax. Cambridge: The Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Cipolla, C. (1965). Guns and sails in the early phase of European expansion 1400–1700. London: Pantheon.Google Scholar
  8. Gellner, E. (1983). Nations and nationalism. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  9. Hall, R. (1985). Power and liberties. Berkeley: University of California.Google Scholar
  10. Hicks, J. (1969). The theory of economic history. Oxford: The Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Hoffman, P. (1989). Taxes, fiscal crises, and representative institutions: The case of early modern France. MS Center for the History of Freedom, Washington University, St. Louis.Google Scholar
  12. Mann, M. (1986). The sources of social power, Vol. I. Cambridge: The Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  13. North, D. (1981). Structure and change in economic history. Cambridge: The Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  14. North, D. and Weingast, B. (1989). Constitutions and commitment: Evolution of the institutions governing public choice in 17th century England. Journal of Economic History (forthcoming).Google Scholar
  15. Popkin, S. (1979). The rational peasant. Berkeley: University of California.Google Scholar
  16. Root, H. and Ingberman, D. (1989). Tying the King's hands: Credible commitments and royal fiscal policy in Old Regime France. MS University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
  17. Schumpeter, J. (1919). Fiscal crises and the tax state. In R. Musgrave and A. Peacock, Classics in the theory of public finance. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Barry R. Weingast
    • 1
  1. 1.Hoover Institution on War, Revolution and PeaceStanford

Personalised recommendations