Documenta Ophthalmologica

, Volume 70, Issue 1, pp 19–28 | Cite as

Retinocortical conduction time in diabetics with abnormal pattern reversal electroretinograms and visual evoked potentials

  • Gary L. Trick
  • Ronald M. Burde
  • Mae O. Gordon
  • Charles Kilo
  • Julio V. Santiago
Article

Abstract

Clinically evident retinal vascular disease in patients with diabetes mellitus may be preceded by an increase in visual evoked potential latency in electrophysiologic testing. This increase may indicate either retinal or optic nerve dysfunction. To determine the origin of the latency increase we initiated a cross-sectional study of simultaneous pattern-reversal electroretinograms and visual evoked potentials. We recorded transient (3.8 reversals/second) pattern electroretinograms and visual evoked potentials using both 15' and 60' high-contrast black-white checks. Fifty-five diabetic patients (34 with no retinoapthy and 21 with background retinopathy) and 34 age-matched visual normals (controls) were tested. Group data in diabetics showed significant latency increases in both tests, but not significant differences in retinocortical conduction time were noted. These results suggest that the increases in visual evoked potential latency exhibited by diabetic patients with little or no retinopathy usually reflect altered retinal function rather than optic neuropathy. Two patients with background retinopathy exhibited retinocortical conduction times that exceeded the mormal mean by more than two standard deviations, suggesting that optic neuropathy may occasionally occur in diabetic patients with background retinopathy.

Key words

Diabetes mellitus electroretinogram visual evoked potential 

Abbreviations

RCCT

retiocortical conduction time

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Bresnick GH. Diabetic retinopathy viewed as a neurosensory disorder. Arch Ophthalmol 1986; 104: 989–90.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    L'Esperance FA, James MA. The problem of diabetic retinopahty. In: Little HL, et al, eds. Diabetic retinopathy. New York: Thieme-Stratton, 1983.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bresnick GH, Condit RS, Palta M, Korth K, Groo A, Syrjala S. Association of hue discrimination loss and diabetic retinopathy. Arch Ophthalmol 1985; 103: 1317–24.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sokol S, Moskowitz A, Skarf B, Evans R, Molitch M, Senior B. Contrast sensitivity in diabetics with and without retinopathy. Arch Ophthalmol 1985; 103: 51–4.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cox J. Color vision defects acquired in diseases of the eye. Br J Physiol Optics 1960; 17: 195–8.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Arden GB, Gucukoglu AG. Grating test of contrast sensitivity in patients with retrobulbar neuritis. Arch Ophthalmol 1978; 96; 1626–9.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Puvanendran K, Devathasan G, Wong PK. Visual evoked responses in diabetes. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1983; 46: 643–7.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sherman J, Bass SJ, Noble KG, Nath S, Sutija V. Visual evoked potential (VEP) delays in central serous choroidopathy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1986; 27: 214–21.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Diabetic Retinopathy Study. Report Number 7: A modification of the Airlie House classification of diabetic retinopathy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1981; 21: 210–26.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Collier A, Mitchell JD. Visual evoked potential and contrast sensitivity function in diabetic retinopathy. Br Med J 1985; 291: 248.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Diabetic Retinopathy Study. Report Number 6: Design, methods and baseline results. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1981; 21: 149–209.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wanger P, Persson HE. Early diagnosis of retinal changes in diabetes. A comparison between electroretinography and retinal biomicroscopy. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenhagen) 1985; 63: 716–20.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Arden GB, Hamilton AMP, Wilson-Hoyt J, Ryan S, Yudkin JS, Kurtz A. Pattern ellectroretinograms become abnormal when background retinopathy deteriorates to a preproliferative stage. Possible use as a screening test. Br J Ophthalmol 1986; 70: 330–5.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Celesia GG, Kaufman D, Cone SB. Simultaneous recording of pattern electroretinography and visual evoked potentials in multiple sclerosis. A method to separate demyelination from axonal damage to the optic nerve. Arch Neurol 1986; 43: 1247–52.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gary L. Trick
    • 1
  • Ronald M. Burde
    • 1
  • Mae O. Gordon
    • 1
  • Charles Kilo
    • 1
  • Julio V. Santiago
    • 1
  1. 1.Washington University school of medicineSt. LouisUSA

Personalised recommendations