Quality and Quantity

, Volume 7, Issue 2, pp 203–294 | Cite as

Surveying attitude structures: A discussion of principles and procedures

  • Aubrey C. McKennell


Attitude Structure 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Abelson, R.B. and M.J. Rosenberg, (1958). “Symbolic-psychologic: A Model for Attitudinal Cognition,” Behavioral Science 3: 1–8.Google Scholar
  2. Adams, E.W., R.F. Fagot and R.E. Robinson. (1965). A Theory of Appropriate Statistics; Psychometrika, 30: 99–128.Google Scholar
  3. Anderson, L.R. and M. Fishbein, (1965). “Prediction of Attitude from the Number, Strength and Evaluative Aspect of Beliefs about the Attitude Object,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 3: 437–443.Google Scholar
  4. Anderson, N.H. (1965). “Averaging versus Adding as a Stimulus-Combination Rule in Impression Formations,” Journal of Experimental Psychology 70: 394–400.Google Scholar
  5. Baker, B.V., C.D. Hardyck and L.F. Petrinovich. (1966). Weak measurements versus strong statistics; Educ. and Psychol. Measmt., XXVI: 291–309.Google Scholar
  6. Barton, A.H. (1955). “The Concept of Property-Space in Social Research.” In P.F. Lazarsfeld and M. Rosenberg (eds.), The Language of Social Research. London: Collier-Macmillan.Google Scholar
  7. Blalock H.M. and A.B. Blalock (Eds.) (1968). Methodology in Social Research, McGraw-Hill, London.Google Scholar
  8. Bohrnstedt, G.W. (1969), “A Quick Method for Determining the Reliability and Validity of Multiple-item Scales,” American Sociological Review 34: 542–548.Google Scholar
  9. Bolshev, L.N. (1969). “Cluster Analysis,” Proceedings of the International Statistical Institute (London), pp. 1–15.Google Scholar
  10. Bonjean, C., R. Hill and S. McLemore (1968). Sociological Measurement. Chandler Pub. Co., San Francisco.Google Scholar
  11. Borgatta, E.F. (1969). Prologue: The current status of methodology in Sociology. In E.F. Borgatta (ed.) Sociological Methodology; Jossey Bass, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  12. Borgatta, E.F. and W. Stolz (1963). “A Note on a Computer Program for a Rearrangement of Matrices,” Sociometry 26: 391–392.Google Scholar
  13. Brennan, T. (1973). “Numerical Taxonomy: Theory and Some Applications in Educational Research.” Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, University of Lancaster.Google Scholar
  14. Brown, R. (1965). Social Psychology: Collier-Macmillan, London.Google Scholar
  15. Butler, D. and D. Stokes, (1969). Political Change in Britain. Macmillan: London.Google Scholar
  16. Bynner, J.M. (1967). “A Study of Medical Students' Attitudes to Smoking,” H.M.S.O., Government Social Survey Report SS. 382/2.Google Scholar
  17. Bynner, J.M. (1968). Smoking among schoolboys: Government Social Survey Report S.S. 383, London, H.M.S.O.Google Scholar
  18. Campbell, A., and P.E. Converse, (1972). The Human Meaning of Social Change. New York Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  19. Campbell, A., P.E. Converse, W.E. Miller, and D.E. Stokes, (1960). The American Voter. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
  20. Campbell, D.T. and D.W. Fiske, (1969). “Convergent and Discriminant Validation by the Multilitrait-Multimethod Matrix,” Psychological Bulletin 56: 81–105.Google Scholar
  21. Campbell, E.Q. and A.C. Kerchoff, (1957). “A Critique of the Concept ‘Universe of Attributes’,” Public Opinion Quarterly, 21: 295–303.Google Scholar
  22. Cartwright, D. and F. Harary, (1956). “Structural Balance: A Generalization of Heider's Theory.” Psychological Review 63: 277–293.Google Scholar
  23. Cattell, R.P., and M.A. Coulter, (1966). “Principles of Behavioural Taxonomy and a Mathematical Basis of the Taxonome Computer Program,” British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology 19: 237–269.Google Scholar
  24. Cicourel, A.B. (1964). Method and Measurement in Sociology. London: Collier-McMillan.Google Scholar
  25. Coleman, J.S. (1957). Multidimensional scale analysis. American Journal of Sociology, 63, pp. 253–263.Google Scholar
  26. Converse, P.E. (1964). “The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics.” In D.E. Apter (ed.), Ideology and Discontent. London: Collier-Macmillan.Google Scholar
  27. Coombs, C.H. (1953). “Theory and Methods of Social Measurement.” In L. Festinger and D. Katz (eds.), Research Methods in the Behavioral Sciences. London: Holt, Rhinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
  28. Coombs, C.H. (1964). Theory of Data. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
  29. Cronbach, L.J. (1951). “Coefficient Alpha and the Internal Structure of Tests,” Psycometrika 16: 297–364.Google Scholar
  30. Cronbach, L.J., N. Rajaratnam, and G.C. Fleser, (1963). “Theory of Generalizability: A Liberalization of Reliability Theory,” British Journal of Statistical Psychology, 16: 163–173.Google Scholar
  31. Dawes, R.M. (1972). Fundamentals of Attitude Measurement. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  32. Dodder, R.A. (1970). “A Factor Analysis of Dean's Alienation Scale,” Social Forces 48: 252–255.Google Scholar
  33. Duncan, O.D. (1966). Path analysis: Sociological examples. Am. J. Soc., 72, pp. 1–16.Google Scholar
  34. Edwards, A.L. (1957). Techniques of Attitude Scale Construction. Appleton-Century-Crofts, N.Y.Google Scholar
  35. Edwards, A.L. and K.C. Kenny, (1946), “A Comparison of Thurstone and Likert Techniques of Attitude Scale Construction,” Journal of Applied Psychology XXX: 72–83.Google Scholar
  36. Entwhistle, N.J. and T. Brennan, (1971). “The Academic Performance of Students: Two Types of Successful Students,” British Journal of Educational Psychology 41: 268–276.Google Scholar
  37. Eysenck, E.J. (1947). “Primary Social Attitudes,” International Journal of Opinion and Attitude Research 1: 49–84.Google Scholar
  38. Fishbein, M. (1967). “A Consideration of Beliefs and Their Role in Attitude Measurement.” In M. Fishbein, (Ed.) Readings in Attitude Theory and Measurement. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
  39. Frank, R.E. and P.E. Green, (1968). “Numerical Taxonomy in Marketing Analysis: A Review Article,” Journal of Marketing Research 5: 83–94.Google Scholar
  40. Frost, W.A.K. (1969). “The Development of a Technique for T.V. Programme Assessment,” Journal of the Market Research Society 11: 24–44.Google Scholar
  41. Frost, W.A.K. and R.L. Braine, (1967). “The Application of Repertory Grid Technique Problems in Market Research,” Commentary 9: 161–175.Google Scholar
  42. Galtung, J. (1967). Theory and Methods of Social Research. George Allen & Unwin, London.Google Scholar
  43. Goldthorpe, J.H., D. Lockwood, F. Bechhofer, and J. Platt (1968). The Affluent Workers: Industrial Attitudes and Behaviour. Cambridge: University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Green, B.F. (1954). “Attitude Measurement.” In G. Lindzey (ed.), Handbook of Social Psychology, Vol. 1. London: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  45. Green, P.E. (1969). “Dimensional Interpretation and Configuration Invariance in Multidimensional Scaling: An Empirical Study,” Multivariate Behavioral Research 4: 159–180.Google Scholar
  46. Green, P.E., A. Maheshwari, and B.R. Rao, (1969). Self Concept and Brand Preference: An Empirical Application of Multidimensional Scaling. J. Market Research Soc., 11, 343–360.Google Scholar
  47. Green, R.T. and B.G. Stacey, (1964). “Was Torquemada Tenderminded,” Acta Psychologica, 22: 250–271.Google Scholar
  48. Guttman, L. (1944). A basis for scaling qualitative data. Am. Sociol. Rev., 9, pp. 139–150.Google Scholar
  49. Guttman, L. (1968). A general nonmetric technique for finding the smallest coordinate space for a configuration of points. Psychometrika, 33, pp. 469–506.Google Scholar
  50. Guttman, L. (1950). In S.A. Stouffer et al., Measurement and Prediction, Vol. 4. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
  51. Harman, H.H. (1967). Modern Factor Analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  52. Heise, D.R. (1969). “Some Methodological Issues in Semantic Differential Research,” Psychological Bulletin 72: 406–422.Google Scholar
  53. Hempel, C.G. (1952). “Fundamentals of Concept Formation in Empirical Science,” International Encyclopedia of Unified Science, 2, No. 7. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  54. Hendrickson, A.E. and P.O. White, (1966). “Higher-order Factor Rotation”, British Journal of Mathematical Psychology 19: 97–103.Google Scholar
  55. Henry, H. (1966). Motivation Research; Crosby Lockwood; London.Google Scholar
  56. Hilgendorf, E.L. and B.L. Irving, (1969). “Job Attitude Research: A New Conceptual and Analytical Model,” Human Relations 22: 415–426.Google Scholar
  57. Himmelweit, H.T. and B. Swift, (1971). “Adolescent and Adult Authoritarianism Re-examined: Its Organization and Stability of Time,” European Journal of Social Psychology 1: 357–384.Google Scholar
  58. Horn, J.L. (1965). An empirical comparison of various methods for estimating common factor scores. Educ. and Psychol. Measmt., 25, pp. 313–322.Google Scholar
  59. Horn, J.L. (1969). “On the Internal Consistency Reliability of Factors,” Multivariate Behavioral Research 4: 115–125.Google Scholar
  60. Horton, M. (1971). “Alienation: A Multi-dimensional Concept,” Bulletin of the British Psychological Society 82: 67. Report of a Ph. D. Thesis, in preparation.Google Scholar
  61. Hovland, C.I. (1959). “Reconciling Conflicting Results Derived from Experimental and Survey Studies of Attitude Change,” The American Psychologist 14: 8–17.Google Scholar
  62. Howard, J.A., and J.N. Sheth, (1969). The Theory of Buyer Behavior. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
  63. Husek, T.R. and M.C. Wittrock, (1962). “The Dimension of Attitudes Towards Teachers as Measured by the Semantic Differential,” Journal of Educational Psychology 53: 209–213.Google Scholar
  64. Insko, C.A. (1969). Theories of Attitude Change. Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York.Google Scholar
  65. Kaplan, A. (1964). The Conduct of Inquiry. San Francisco: Chandler.Google Scholar
  66. Katz, D. (1944). The Measurement of Intensity. In H. Cantril (Ed.) Gauging Public Opinion; Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton.Google Scholar
  67. Katz, D. (1960). “The Functional Approach to the Study of Attitudes,” Public Opinion Quarterly 24: 163–204.Google Scholar
  68. Katz, D. (1967). “The Practice and Potential of Survey Methods in Psychological Research.” In C.Y. Glock (ed.), Survey Research in the Social Sciences. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  69. Kelly, G.A. (1955). The Psychology of Personal Constructs. New York: W.W. Naughten.Google Scholar
  70. Kerlinger, F.N. (1967). “Social Attitudes and Their Criterial Referents,” Psychological Review 74: 110–122.Google Scholar
  71. Klapper, J.P. (1960). The Effects of Mass Communication. Free Press of Glencoe: Illinois.Google Scholar
  72. Komorita, S.S. and W.K. Graham (1965). Number of scale points and the reliability of scales. Educ. and Psychol. Measmt., 25, pp. 987–995.Google Scholar
  73. Krech, D. and R.S. Crutchfield (1948). Theory and Problems of Social Psychology, McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  74. Kutner, B., C. Wilkins, and P.R. Yarrow, (1952). “Verbal Attitudes and Overt Behavior Involving Racial Prejudice,” Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 47: 649–652.Google Scholar
  75. La Piere, R.T. (1934). “Attitudes Versus Action,” Social Forcess 13: 230–237.Google Scholar
  76. Lazarsfeld, P.F. (1944). “Controversy over Detailed Interviews—An Offer for Negotiation,” Public Opinion Quarterly 8: 38–60.Google Scholar
  77. Lazarsfeld, P.F. (1950). The logical and mathematical foundation of latent structure analysis Measurement and Prediction, S.A. Stouffer et al., Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton.Google Scholar
  78. Lazarsfeld, P.F. (1958). “Evidence and Influence in Social Research,” Daedalus 87: 99–129.Google Scholar
  79. Lazarsfeld, P.F. (1959). “Problems in Methodology.” in R.K. Merton et al. (eds.), Sociology Today. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  80. Lazarsfeld, P.F. (1966). “Concept Formation and Measurement in the Behavioral Sciences.” In G.J. De Renzo (ed.), Concepts, Theory and Explanation in the Behavioral Sciences. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  81. Likert, R. (1932). A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Arch. Psychol., 22 (140), 55.Google Scholar
  82. Lingoes, J.C. (1963). Multiple scalogram analysis: a set-theoretic model for analyzing dichotomous items. Educ. and Psychol. Measmt., 23, 3, pp. 501–524.Google Scholar
  83. Loevinger, J. (1948). “The Technique of Homogeneous Tests,” Psychological Bulletin 45: 507–529.Google Scholar
  84. Lumsden, J. (1961). “The Construction of Unidimensional Tests,” Psychological Bulletin 58: 122–131.Google Scholar
  85. Lunn, J.A. (1966). “Psychological Classification,” Commentary 8: 161–173.Google Scholar
  86. Lunn, J.A. (1970). “Measuring Achievement Motivation in the General Population”, Bulletin of the British Psychological Society 23: 130. Report on work being undertaken for a Ph. D. Thesis.Google Scholar
  87. Market Research Society (1960). Attitude Scaling. Market Research Society Publication No. 4; Market Research Society and Oakwood Press, London.Google Scholar
  88. Matell, M.S. and J. Jacoby, (1971). “Is There an Optimal Number of Alternatives for Likert Scale Items?”, Educational and Psychological Measurement 31: 657–674.Google Scholar
  89. McGuire, W.J. (1969). “The Nature of Attitudes and Attitude Change”. In G. Lindsey and E. Aronson (eds.), Handbook of Social Psychology, Vol. 3, 2nd ed. London: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  90. McKennell, A.C. (1963). “Aircraft Noise Annoyance Around London (Heathrow) Airport,” U.K. Government Social Survey Report SS. 337.Google Scholar
  91. McKennell, A.C. (1965). “Correlational Analysis of Social Survey Data”, The Sociological Review 13 157–181.Google Scholar
  92. McKennell, A.C. (1966a). “Some Uses of Factor Analysis in Social Survey Work”, U.K. Government Social Survey Methodological Paper M. 125.Google Scholar
  93. McKennell, A.C. (1966b). “The Contribution of Psychologists to Government Social Survey Work”. Paper in the U.K. Government Social Survey General Series (G. 65).Google Scholar
  94. McKennell, A.C. (1967). “Adults' and Adolescents' Smoking Habits and Attitudes”, H.M.S.O., Government Social Survey Report 353B.Google Scholar
  95. McKennell, A.C. (1969). “Methodological Problems in a Survey of Aircraft Noise Annoyance”, The Statistician 19: 1–29.Google Scholar
  96. McKennell, A.C. (1970). Attitude Measurement: use of coefficient alpha with cluster or factor analysis. Sociology, 4, 2, pp. 227–245.Google Scholar
  97. McKennell, A.C. (1971). Monitoring the Quality of National Life: A Commentary. Unpublished paper prepared for the U.K. SSRC survey unit. To appear, with modifications, in “Subjective Elements of Well-being”, OECD: Paris (Burkhard Strumpel (Ed.)).Google Scholar
  98. McKennell, A.C. (1973). A Comparison of Two Smoking Typologies. Research Paper No. 12. London: Tobacco Research Council.Google Scholar
  99. McKennell, A.C. and J. Bynner, (1969). “Self Images and Smoking Behaviour Among School-boys”, British Journal of Educational Psychology 39: 27–39.Google Scholar
  100. McKennell, A.C. (1971). Measurement of annoyance due to aircraft noise. Appendix F in Second Survey of Aircraft Noise Annoyance Around London (Heathrow) Airport. H.M.S.O., London.Google Scholar
  101. McKennell, A.C. and R.K. Thomas (1967). Adults' and Adolescents' Smoking Habits and Attitudes. Government Social Survey Report 353B, H.M.S.O., London.Google Scholar
  102. McQuitty, L.L. (1960). Hierarchical linkage analysis for the isolation of types. Educ. and Psychol. Measmt., 20, pp. 55–67.Google Scholar
  103. McNemar, Q. (1946). “Opinion-attitude Methodology”, Psychological Bulletin XLIII: 289–374.Google Scholar
  104. Miller, Delbert C. (1970). Handbook of Research Design and Social Measurement, 2nd Ed. David McKay Co. Inc., New York.Google Scholar
  105. Morgan, N. and J.M. Purnell, (1969). “Isolating Openings for a New Product in a Multidimensional Space”, Journal of the Market Research Society 11: 245–266.Google Scholar
  106. Morton-Williams, R., S. Finch and C. Poe, (1966). “Undergraduates Attitudes to School-teaching as a Career”, U.K. Government Social Survey Report SS. 354Google Scholar
  107. Moser, C.A. and G. Kalton, (1971). Survey Methods in Social Investigation. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  108. Murray, H.A. (1938). Explorations in Personality: New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  109. Neal, A.G. and S. Rettig, (1967). “On the Multidimensionality of Alienation”, American Sociological Review 32: 54–65.Google Scholar
  110. Northrop, F.S.C. (1947). The Logic of the Sciences and the Humanities. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  111. Nunnally, J.C. (1967). Psychometric Theory: London: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  112. Oppenheim, A.N. (1966). Questionnaire Design in Attitude Measurement. Basic Books, New York.Google Scholar
  113. Osgood, C.E., G.J. Suci, and P.H. Tannenbaum, (1957). The Measurement of Meaning. University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  114. Ostrom, T.M. (1969). “The Relationship Between the Affective, Behavioral and Cognitive Components of Attitude”, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 5: 12–13.Google Scholar
  115. Ostrom, T.M. (1971). “Item Construction in Attitude Measurement”, Public Opinion Quarterly 35: 593–600.Google Scholar
  116. Payne, S.L. (1951). The Art of Asking Questions. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, N.J.Google Scholar
  117. Peabody, D. (1962). Two components in bi-polar scales: direction and extremeness. Psychol. Rev., 69: 65–73.Google Scholar
  118. Plowden Report (1966). The 1964 National Survey: Survey Among Parents of Primary School Children, Vol 2, App. 3.Google Scholar
  119. Roach, D.E. and R.J. WherrySr., (1972). “The Use of Hierarchical Factor Analysis in the Determination of Corporate Image Dimensions. Educational and Psychological Measurement 32: 31–45.Google Scholar
  120. Robinson, J.P. et al. (1968–69). Measures of Political Attitudes; Measures of Occupational Attitudes; and Measures of Social Psychological Attitudes. Ann Arbor: Institute for Social Research.Google Scholar
  121. Rokeach, M. (1969). Beliefs, Attitudes and Values. Jossey-Bass: San Francisco.Google Scholar
  122. Rosenberg, M.J. (1956). “Cognitive Structure and Attitudinal Effect,” Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 53: 367–372.Google Scholar
  123. Roslow, S. and A.B. Blankenship (1939). Phrasing the question in consumer research. J. App. Psychol., 23: 612–622.Google Scholar
  124. Ross, J. (1970). Multidimensional scaling of attitudes. Chap. 17 in Attitude Measurement, G.F. Summers (Ed.), Rand McNally & Co., Chicago.Google Scholar
  125. Royce, J.R. (1963). “Factors as Theoretical Constructs”, The American Psychologist 18: 522–527.Google Scholar
  126. Schmid, J. and J.M. Leiman, (1957). “The Development of Hierarchical Factor Solutions”, Psychometrika 22: 53–61.Google Scholar
  127. Schooler, C. (1969). “A Note of Extreme Caution of the Use of Guttman Scales”, American Journal of Sociology 74: 296–301.Google Scholar
  128. Schuessler, K.M. (1952). “Item Selection for Scale Analysis”, American Sociological Review 17: 183–192.Google Scholar
  129. Scott, W.A. (1960). “Measures of Test Homogeneity”, Educational and Psychological Measurement 20: 751–757.Google Scholar
  130. Scott, W.A. (1968), “Attitude Measurement”, in G. Lindzey and E. Aranson (eds.), Handbook of Social Psychology, 2, Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  131. Seiler, Lauren H. and Richard L. Hough (1970). Empirical comparisons of the Thurstone and Likert techniques. Chap. 8 in Attitude Measurement, G.F. Summers (Ed.), Rand McNally & Co., Chicago.Google Scholar
  132. Selltiz, C., M. Jahoda, M. Deutsch, and S.W. Cook. Research Methods in Social Relations. Holt, Rinehart & Winston, New York.Google Scholar
  133. Selvin, A.C. and A. Stuart, (1966). “Data-Dredging Procedures in Survey Analysis”, The American Statistician 20: 20–23.Google Scholar
  134. Shaw, Marvin E. and Jack M. Wright. (1967). Scales for the Measurement of Attitudes. McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  135. Siegel, S. (1956). Nonparametric Statistics, McGraw-Hill, London.Google Scholar
  136. Smith, G.H. (1954). Motivation Research in Advertising and Marketing. McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  137. Social and Community Planning Research (1972). Depth interviews and group discussions. Technical manual No. 4.Google Scholar
  138. Stacey, B.G. and P.T. Green (1969). The Psychological Bases of Political Allegiance Among White Collar Males. Brit. J. Soc. & Clin. Psychol. 8: 45–60.Google Scholar
  139. Stephenson, W. (1953). A Study of Behavior. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  140. Stevens, S.S. (1968). “Measurement, Statistics, and the Schemapiric View”, Science 161: 849–856.Google Scholar
  141. Stevens, S.S. (1946). On the theory of scales of measurement. Science 103: 677–680.Google Scholar
  142. Sugarman, B. (1967). Involvement in youth culture, academic achievement and conformity in school: an empirical study of London schoolboys. Brit. J. Sociol., 18: 151–164.Google Scholar
  143. Summers, Gene F. (1970) Attitude Measurement. Rand McNally & Co., Chicago.Google Scholar
  144. Thomas, (1966). “Towards an Optimum Procedure for Scalogram Analysis”, U.K. Government Social Survey, Methodological Series M. 128.Google Scholar
  145. Thurstone, L.L. (1928). Attitudes can be measured. Am. J. Sociol., 33: 529–554.Google Scholar
  146. Thurstone, L.L. and E.J. Chave (1929). The Measurement of Attitude. Univ. Chicago Press., Chicago.Google Scholar
  147. Triandis, H.C. (1960). “A Comparative Factorial Analysis of Job Semantic Structures of Managers and Workers”, Journal of Applied Psychology 44: 297–302.Google Scholar
  148. Triandis, H.C. (1964). “Exploratory Factor Analysis in the Behavioral Component of Social Attitude”, Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 68: 420–430.Google Scholar
  149. Tryon, R.C. and D.E. Bailey, (1970). Cluster Analysis. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  150. Upshaw, H.S. (1968). “Attitude Measurement”. In H.M. Blalock and A.P. Blalock (eds.), Methodology in Social Research. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  151. Vernon, P.E. (1964). Personality Assessment. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
  152. Wang, K.A. (1932). Suggested criteria for writing attitude statements. J. Soc. Psychol., 3, 367–373.Google Scholar
  153. White, B.W. and Saltz, (1957). “Measurement of Reproducibility”, Psychological Bulletin 54: 51–99.Google Scholar
  154. Wicker, A.W. (1969). “Attitude Versus Actions: The Relationship of Verbal and Overt Responses to Attitude Objects”, Journal of Social Issues, 25: 41–78.Google Scholar
  155. Wilson, G.D. and J.R. Patterson, (1968). “A New Measure of Conservativism”, British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology 7: 264–269.Google Scholar
  156. Wishart, D. (1970). Some Problems in Theory and Applications of the Method of Numerical Taxonomy. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis. St. Andrew's University.Google Scholar
  157. Wylie, R. (1961) The Self-Concept: A Critical Survey of Pertinent Research Literature. University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company 1974

Authors and Affiliations

  • Aubrey C. McKennell
    • 1
  1. 1.University of SouthamptonEngland

Personalised recommendations