International Ophthalmology

, Volume 15, Issue 3, pp 193–200 | Cite as

A perimetric nerve fiber bundle map

  • Jörg Weber
  • Holger Ulrich
Article

Abstract

The so-called ‘nerve fiber bundle defects’ in the visual field are considered as being the fuctional equivalent of retinal nerve fiber bundle damage. This study examines the course and the position of scotoma borders in 159 visual fields with complete nerve fiber bundle defects using high resolution test point patterns. The scotoma border lines were averaged geometrically. The result is presented in the form of mean vectors.

This functional map of nerve fiber lines shows a close correspondence to the anatomical course of the retinal nerve fibers. To make the result suitable for topographical analysis of visual fields, 21 areas (‘Perimetric Nerve Fiber Bundles’) are defined. Certain arbitrary assumptions were neccessary because data were to scanty in some nasal regions. Also, the lines had to be fitted into a rectangular grid to be transferable to standard perimetric patterns.

Topographical analysis on the basis of these areas may be useful for the evaluation of visual fields, particularly those of glaucoma.

Key words

automated perimetry glaucoma topography retinal nerve fiber bundle analysis 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Bjerrum J. Om en Tilföjelse til den sädvanlige Synsfeltsundersögelse samt om Sunsfeltet ved Glaucom. Nord ophthalmol Tisskrift 1889; 2:141.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rönne H. Über das Vorkommen von Nervenfaserdefekten im Gesichtsfelde und besonders über den nasalen Gesichtsfeldsprung. Arch Augenh 1913; 74: 180–201.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Okubo K, Mizokami K. Fundus perimetry and Octopus perimetry for the evaluation of nerve fiber layer defects. Docum Ophthalmol Proc Ser 1985; 42: 457–66.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wirtschafter JD, Becker W, Howe J, Younge B. Glaucoma visual field analysis by computer profile of nerve fiber function in optic disc sectors. Ophthalmology 1982; 89: 255–67.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Duggan C, Sommer A, Auer C, Burkhard K. Automated differential threshold perimetry for detecting glaucomatous visual field loss. Am J Ophthalmol 1985; 100: 420–3.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Schwartz BJ, Nagin P. Probability maps for evaluating automated visual fields. Docum Ophthalmol Proc Ser 1985; 42: 39–48.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hoskins D, Magee SD, Drake MV, Kidd MN. Confidence intervals for change in automated visual fields. Br J Ophthalmol 1988; 72: 591–7.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Werner EB, Bishop KI, Koelle J, Douglas GR, LeBlanc RP. A comparison of experienced clinical observers and statistical tests in detection of progressive visual field loss in glaucoma using automated perimetry. Arch Ophthalmol 1988; 106: 619–23.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ballantyne A. The nerve fibre pattern of the human retina. Tr Ophthalmol Soc U Kingdom 1947; 66: 179–91.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Vrabec F. The temporal raphe of the human retina. Am J Ophthalmol 1966; 62: 926–38.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hills JF, Wirtschafter JD, Maeder P. Boundary curves for dividing visual fields into sectors corresponding to a retinotopic projection onto the optic disc. Docum Ophthalmol Proc Ser 1983; 35: 459–64.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Weber J, Ulrich H. Die exakte Lokalisation der Nervenfaser-äquivalenten Linien im Gesichtsfeld. Fortschr Ophthalmol 1987; 84: 101–3.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Weber J, Kosel J. Glaukomperimetrie — Die Optimierung von Prüfpunktrastern mit einem Informationsindex. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilk 1986; 189: 110–7.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Weber J, Schultze T, Ulrich H. The visual field in advanced glaucoma. Int Ophthalmol 1989; 13: 47–50.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Aulhorn E, Karmeyer H. Frequency distribution in early glaucomatous visual field defects. Docum Ophthalmol Proc Ser 1977; 14: 75–83.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rössler F. Die Höhenstellung des blinden Flecks in normalen Augen. Arch Augenheilk 1920; 68: 55–88.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jörg Weber
    • 1
  • Holger Ulrich
    • 1
  1. 1.Dept. of OphthalmologyUniversity of CologneKölnFRG

Personalised recommendations