Advertisement

Public Choice

, Volume 63, Issue 2, pp 149–164 | Cite as

The size of the state, economic growth and the efficient utilization of national resources

  • Gerald W. Scully
Article

Summary and conclusions

The motives of the state in projecting a more than minimal presence in the economy may be conceived of as benevolent or malevolent. Whatever the characterization of the motivation, increases in the size of the government share of the economy adversely affect economic growth and the allocation of resources. Nations with relatively large government shares in 1960 on the whole grew more slowly than nations with relatively small state sectors. Interperiod increases in the size of government were associated with lower growth rates over the period. The size of the government share coefficients in the regressions were of sufficiently large magnitude to conclude that the rise in the size of the government has had a substantial depressing effect on economic growth. These results are consistent with those reported by Landau (1983) and Marlow (1986). Landau did not adjust economic growth for the growth in factor endowment. Consequently, his results overstate the adverse effect of government size.

Government allocation of resources is thought to be less efficient than private allocation. For the first time in the literature, this hypothesis was tested directly by comparing efficiency measures with the measures of the size of the government sector. It was found that the size of the government share in the economy was negatively correlated with economic efficiency and with the inter-period change in economic efficiency. Nations with relatively large state sectors produced less output per head with the same input ratio than nations with relatively small government sectors.

Keywords

Economic Growth Economic Efficiency Private Allocation Depressing Effect Small State 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aigner, D.J. and Chu, S.F. (1968). Estimating the industry production function. A.E.R. 58 (September): 826–839.Google Scholar
  2. Aigner, D.J., Lovell, C.A. and Schmidt, P. (1977). Formulation and estimation of stochastic production models. Journal of Econometrics (January): 21–37.Google Scholar
  3. Brennan, G. and Buchanan, J.M. (1980). The power to tax: Analytical foundations of a fiscal constitution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Buchanan, J.M. (1960). La scienza della finanze: The Italian tradition in fiscal theory. In J.M. Buchanan (Ed.), Fiscal theory and political economy, 24–74. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
  5. Buchanan, J.M. and Tullock, G. (1962). The calculus of consent. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  6. Buchanan, J.M. (1975). The limits of liberty. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  7. Buchanan, J.M. (1980). Rent seeking and profit seeking. In J.M. Buchanan, G. Tullock and R.D. Tollison (Eds.), Toward a theory of the rent-seeking society, 3–15. College Station: Texas A&M University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Caves, D.W., Christensen, L.R. and Diewert, W.E. (1982). Multilateral comparisons of output, input, and productivity using superlative index numbers. The Economic Journal 92 (March): 73–86.Google Scholar
  9. Dempster, A.P., Laird, N.M. and Rubin, D.G. (1977). Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 39: 1–38.Google Scholar
  10. Downs, A. (1957). An economic theory of democracy. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  11. Green, W.H. (1980). Maximum likelihood estimation of econometric frontier functions. Journal of Econometrics 13: 27–56.Google Scholar
  12. Green, W.H. (1980). The estimation of a flexible frontier production model. Journal of Econometrics 13: 101–115.Google Scholar
  13. Harberger, A.C. (1978). Perspectives on capital and technology in less-developed countries. In M.J. Artis and A.R. Nobay (Eds.), Contemporary Economic Analysis. London: Croom-Helm.Google Scholar
  14. Huang, C.J. (1984). Estimation of stochastic frontier production function and technical inefficiency via the EM algorithm. Southern Economic Journal 50 (3): 847–856.Google Scholar
  15. Krueger, A.O. (1974). The political economy of the rent-seeking society. American Economic Review 64 (June): 291–303.Google Scholar
  16. Landau, D. (1983). Government expenditure and economic growth: A cross-country study. Southern Economic Journal 49 (January): 783–792.Google Scholar
  17. Landau, D. Government and economic growth in the less-developed countries. Mimeo.Google Scholar
  18. Marlow, M.L. (1986). Private sector shrinkage and the growth of industrialized economies. Public Choice 49: 143–154.Google Scholar
  19. Musgrave, R.A. (1959). The theory of public finance. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
  20. Nelson, M.A. (1985). Searching for Leviathan: Comment and extension. American Economic Review 75 (September): 198–204.Google Scholar
  21. Niskanen, W.A., Jr. (1971). Bureaucracy and representative government. Chicago: Aldens and Atherton.Google Scholar
  22. Oates, W. (1985). Searching for Leviathan. American Economic Review 75 (September): 748–757.Google Scholar
  23. Olsen, M. (1965). The logic of collective action. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Peltzman, S. (1980). The growth of government. Journal of Law and Economics 23 (2) (October): 209–287.Google Scholar
  25. Ram, R. (1986). Government size and economic growth: A new framework and some evidence from cross-section and time series data. American Economic Review 76 (March): 191–203.Google Scholar
  26. Scully, G.W. (1988). The institutional framework and economic development. Journal of Political Economy 96 (June): 652–662.Google Scholar
  27. Short, R.P. (1984). The role of public enterprises: An international statistical comparison. In R. Floyd, C. Gray and R.P. Short (Eds.), Public enterprise in mixed economies: Some international aspects, 110–194. Washington: International Monetary Fund, 99.Google Scholar
  28. Stigler, G.J. (1970). Director's law of public income redistribution. Journal of Law and Economics 13 (April): 1–10.Google Scholar
  29. Summers, R. and Heston, A. (1984). Improved international comparisons of real product and its composition: 1950–1980. Review of Income and Wealth (June): 207–262.Google Scholar
  30. Tollison, R.D. (1982). Rent-seeking: A survey. Kyklos 35: 575–602.Google Scholar
  31. Tullock, G. (1965). The politics of bureaucracy. Washington: Public Affairs Press.Google Scholar
  32. Tullock, G. (1967). The welfare costs of tariffs, monopolies and theft. Western Economic Journal 5 (June): 224–232.Google Scholar
  33. Tullock, G. (1983). Economics of income redistribution. Boston: Kluwer-Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  34. Tullock, G. (1986). The economics of wealth and poverty. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  35. United Nations. Yearbook of national accounts statistics. New York: United Nations, various years.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gerald W. Scully
    • 1
  1. 1.School of ManagementUniversity of Texas at DallasRichardson

Personalised recommendations