Solar Physics

, Volume 42, Issue 1, pp 259–269 | Cite as

On the possibility of deducing interplanetary and solar parameters from geomagnetic records

  • C. T. Russell


While at present we are able to deduce from ground records only qualitative properties of the solar wind, in the future quantitative deductions may be possible, in a statistical sense, from an examination of polar cap magnetograms together with records of geomagnetic activity. The qualitative inferences that are possible now indicate several important features of the behavior of the solar wind over the last 100 years. First, there appear to be significant long term changes in either the solar wind velocity, the magnetic field strength, the variability of the field or some combination of all three. Second, a heliographic latitude dependence of these parameters exists, whose amplitude depends on sunspot number. Third, with the exception of the most recent solar cycle, there is little north-south asymmetry in these solar parameters. Finally, there is a double sunspot cycle modulation of geomagnetic activity, the most likely cause of which is a modulation of the interplanetary magnetic polarity with latitude, and which in turn implies the presence of a solar polar magnetic dipole. The amplitude of this modulation has undergone significant changes since 1868, being large then and at the present, but effectively disappearing from 1908 to 1948.


Solar Wind Solar Cycle Magnetic Field Strength Magnetic Dipole Sunspot Number 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Arnoldy, R. L.: 1971, J. Geophys. Res. 76, 5189.Google Scholar
  2. Atkinson, G.: 1972, Magnetosphere-Ionosphere Interactions (ed. by K. Folkestad), Universitetsforlaget, Oslo, Norway, p. 203.Google Scholar
  3. Burton, R. K., Russell, C. T., and McPherron, R. L.: 1974, Publication Number 1329, Institute of Geophysics, University of California.Google Scholar
  4. Campbell, W. H. and Matsushita, S.: 1973, J. Geophys. Res. 78, 2079.Google Scholar
  5. Chapman, S. and Bartels, J.: 1940, Geomagnetism, Oxford Press, Oxford, Great Britain.Google Scholar
  6. Chernosky, E. J.: 1966, J. Geophys. Res. 71, 965.Google Scholar
  7. Cortie, A. L.: 1912, Monthly Notices Roy. Astron. Soc. 73, 52.Google Scholar
  8. Ezer, D. and Cameron, A. G. W.: 1972, Nature 240, 180.Google Scholar
  9. Fougere, P. F.: 1974, Planetary Space Sci. 22, 1173.Google Scholar
  10. Fowler, W. A.: 1972, Nature 238, 24.Google Scholar
  11. Friis-Christensen, E. and Wilhjelm, J.: 1974, EOS Trans. AGU 56, 1173.Google Scholar
  12. Friis-Christensen, E., Larsen, K., Wilcox, J. M., Gonzalez, W., and Colburn, D. S.: 1971, Nature Phys. Sci. 233, 48, Sept. 20.Google Scholar
  13. Friis-Christensen, E., Larsen, K., Wilhelm, J., Wilcox, J. M., Gonzalez, W., and Colburn, D. S.: 1972, J. Geophys. Res. 77, 3371.Google Scholar
  14. Garrett, H. B., Dessler, A. J., and Hill, T. W.: 1975, J. Geophys. Res., in press.Google Scholar
  15. Heppner, J. P.: 1972, J. Geophys. Res. 77, 4877.Google Scholar
  16. Hundhausen, A. J., Bame, S. J., and Montgomery, M. D.: 1971, J. Geophys. Res. 22, 5145.Google Scholar
  17. Jørgensen, T. S., Friis-Christensen, E., and Wilhjelm, J.: 1972, J. Geophys. Res. 77, 1976.Google Scholar
  18. Mansurov, S. M.: 1969, Geomagn. Aeron. 9, 622.Google Scholar
  19. Mayaud, P. N.: 1973, ‘A Hundred Year Series of Geomagnetic Data 1868–1967’, IAGA Bulletin No. 33, 255 pp.Google Scholar
  20. McIntosh, D. H.: 1959, Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. London A, 251, 525.Google Scholar
  21. Murayama, J.: 1974, J. Geophys. Res. 79, 297.Google Scholar
  22. Olson, W. P.: 1970, Planetary Space Sci. 18, 1471.Google Scholar
  23. Patel, V. L.: 1969, Planetary Space Sci. 17, 1432.Google Scholar
  24. Rosenberg, R. L. and Coleman, P. J., Jr.: 1969, J. Geophys. Res. 74 (24), 5611–5622.Google Scholar
  25. Russell, C. T.: 1972, Critical Problems of Magnetospheric Physics (ed. by E. R. Dyer), IUCSTP Secretariat, Washington, D. C., p. 1.Google Scholar
  26. Russell, C. T.: 1974, Geophys. Res. Letters 1, 11.Google Scholar
  27. Russell, C. T. and Atkinson, G.: 1973, J. Geophys. Res. 78, 4001.Google Scholar
  28. Russell, C. T. and McPherron, R. L.: 1973a, Space Sci. Rev. 15, 205.Google Scholar
  29. Russell, C. T. and McPherron, R. L.: 1973b, J. Geophys. Res. 78 (1), 92.Google Scholar
  30. Russell, C. T. and Rosenberg, R. L.: 1974, Solar Phys. 37, 251.Google Scholar
  31. Russell, C. T., Burton, R. K., and McPherron, R. L.: 1975, J. Geophys. Res. 80, in press.Google Scholar
  32. Svalgaard, L.: 1968, Danish Meteorological Institute, Geophysical Papers, R-6.Google Scholar
  33. Svalgaard, L.: 1972a, Danish Meteorological Institute, Geophysical Papers, R-29.Google Scholar
  34. Svalgaard, L.: 1972b, J. Geophys. Res. 77, 4027.Google Scholar
  35. Svalgaard, L.: 1973, J. Geophys. Res. 78, 2064.Google Scholar
  36. Svalgaard, L.: 1974, J. Geophys. Res., submitted 1974.Google Scholar
  37. Wilcox, J. M. and Scherrer, P. H.: 1972, J. Geophys. Res. 77, 5385.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© D. Reidel Publishing Company 1975

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. T. Russell
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Geophysics and Planetary Physics, University of CaliforniaLos AngelesU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations