The Hα flare as a secondary product of a coronal instability
- 23 Downloads
- 11 Citations
Abstract
The assumption that the flare originates in the corona or transition layer, is confronted with the known properties of chromospheric flares. It is concluded that the basic mode of the energy transport into chromosphere is heat conduction. Only in some flares non-thermal particles contribute to the brightening in lower atmospheric layers: electrons with energy close to 100 keV produce chromospheric bright patches, and protons above 20 MeV cause the photospheric enhancements. The particle-produced brightenings are superposed on the basic quasi-thermal flare and involve only small areas as compared with the extensive regions heated through conduction.
The most probable height of the flare origin appears to be close to the transition layer, between some 4000 and 7000 km above the photosphere. The non-thermal acceleration (when present) occurs probably higher than where the flare originates. There is no obvious reason why the high electron density in chromospheric flares could not be explained as simply due to increased ionization in the existing plasma, without any flare-induced mass condensations.
Though there are several facts supporting the flare origin in the corona (or transition layer), one cannot exclude the alternative that the flare instability involves simultaneously a wide (and in different cases different) range of altitudes. Energy considerations give some support to such a supposition.
Keywords
Flare Transition Layer High Electron Obvious Reason Secondary ProductPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- Biswas, S. and Radhakrishnan, B.: 1973, Solar Phys. 28, 211.Google Scholar
- Brown, J. C.: 1971, Solar Phys. 18, 489.Google Scholar
- Brown, J. C.: 1972, Solar Phys. 25, 158.Google Scholar
- Brown, J. C.: 1973, Solar Phys., 31, 143.Google Scholar
- Cheng, Chung-Chieh: 1972, Solar Phys. 22, 178.Google Scholar
- Chupp, E. L., Forrest, D. J., Higbie, P. R., Suri, A. N., Tsai, C., and Dunphy, P. B.: 1972, Nature 241, 333.Google Scholar
- Cox, D. P. and Tucker, W. H.: 1969, Astrophys. J. 157, 1157.Google Scholar
- Culhane, J. L., Vesecky, J. F., and Phillips, K. J. H.: 1970, Solar Phys. 15, 394.Google Scholar
- De Feiter, L. D.: 1966, Rech. Astron. Obs. Utrecht, No. 18 (2).Google Scholar
- De Jager, C.: 1967, Solar Phys. 2, 327.Google Scholar
- De Mastus, H. L. and Stover, R. R.: 1967, Publ. Astron. Soc. Pacific 79, 615.Google Scholar
- Dodson, H. W. and Hedeman, E. R.: 1970, Solar Phys. 13, 401.Google Scholar
- Elliot, H.: 1969, in C. de Jager and Z. Švestka (eds.), ‘Solar Flares and Space Research’, Caspar Symp., p. 356.Google Scholar
- Énomé, S., Kakinuma, T., and Tanaka, H.: 1969, Solar Phys. 6, 468.Google Scholar
- Gingerich, G., Noyes, R. W., Kalkofen, W., and Cuny, Y.: 1971, Solar Phys. 18, 347.Google Scholar
- Hudson, H. S.: 1972, Solar Phys. 24, 414.Google Scholar
- Hudson, H. S. and Ohki, K.: 1972, Solar Phys. 23, 155.Google Scholar
- Hyder, C. L.: 1967, Solar Phys. 2, 49 and 267.Google Scholar
- Kahler, S. W. and Kreplin, R. W.: 1970, Solar Phys. 14, 372.Google Scholar
- Kandel, R. S., Papagiannis, M. D., and Strauss, F. M.: 1971, Solar Phys. 21, 176.Google Scholar
- Kane, S. R.: 1969, Astrophys. J. Letters 157, L. 139.Google Scholar
- Kane, S. R. and Anderson, K. A.: 1970, Astrophys. J. 162, 1003.Google Scholar
- Kane, S. R., Kahler, S. W., and Kurfess, J. D.: 1972, Solar Phys. 25, 418.Google Scholar
- Kelly, P. T. and Rense, W. A.: 1972, Solar Phys. 26, 431.Google Scholar
- Korchak, A. A.: 1972, Paper presented at the XIV Meeting of COSPAR, Madrid.Google Scholar
- Lin, R. P. and Hudson, H. S.: 1971, Solar Phys. 17, 412.Google Scholar
- McIntosh, P. S. and Donnelly, R. F.: 1972, Solar Phys. 23, 444.Google Scholar
- Moore, R. L. and Fung, P. C. W.: 1972, Solar Phys. 23, 78.Google Scholar
- Moreton, G. E. and Severny, A. B.: 1968, Solar Phys. 3, 282.Google Scholar
- Najita, K. and Orrall, F. Q.: 1970, Solar Phys. 15, 176.Google Scholar
- Nakagawa, Y., Wu, S. T., and Han, S. M.: 1973, Solar Phys., 30, 111.Google Scholar
- Neupert, W. M.: 1968, Astrophys. J. Letters 153, 59.Google Scholar
- Roy, J. R.: 1972, Solar Phys. 26, 418.Google Scholar
- Severny, A. B.: 1969, Nobel Symp. 9, 71.Google Scholar
- Simon, G. W. and Noyes, R. W.: 1972, Solar Phys. 22, 450.Google Scholar
- Strauss, F. M. and Papagiannis, M. D.: 1971, Astrophys. J. 164, 369.Google Scholar
- Švestka, Z.: 1965, Adv. Astron. Astrophys. 3, 119.Google Scholar
- Švestka, Z.: 1970, Solar Phys. 13, 471.Google Scholar
- Švestka, Z.: 1971, Report of the Meeting of CESRA, 15.Google Scholar
- Švestka, Z.: 1972, Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 10, 1.Google Scholar
- Švestka, Z. and Simon, P.: 1969, Solar Phys. 10, 3.Google Scholar
- Syrovatsky, S. I. and Shmeleva, O. P.: 1972, Soviet Astron. - A.J. 16, 273.Google Scholar
- Takakura, T., Ohki, K., Shibuya, N., Fujii, M., Matsuoka, M., Miyamoto, S., Nishimura, J., Oda, M., Ogawara, Y., and Ota, S.: 1971, Solar Phys. 16, 454.Google Scholar
- Thomas, R. J. and Teske, R. G.: 1971, Solar Phys. 16, 431.Google Scholar
- Tindo, I. P., Ivanov, V. D., Mandelstam, S. L., and Shuryghin, A. I.: 1972, Solar Phys. 24, 429.Google Scholar
- Tindo, I. P., Mandelstam, S. L., and Shuryghin, A. I.: 1973, Solar Phys., in press.Google Scholar
- Vorpahl, J. A.: 1972, Solar Phys. 26, 397.Google Scholar
- Vorpahl, J. and Zirin, H.: 1970, Solar Phys. 11, 285.Google Scholar
- Wood, A. T., Noyes, R. W., Dupree, A. K., Huber, M. C. E., Parkinson, W. H., Reeves, E. M., and Withbroe, G. L.: 1972, Solar Phys. 24, 169.Google Scholar
- Zirin, H. and Tanaka, K.: 1973, Solar Phys., in press.Google Scholar