, Volume 18, Issue 1, pp 23–36 | Cite as

Park and ride facilities on light rail transit systems

  • Ian S. J. Dickins


There is now considerable interest in exploring the idea of strategic park and ride as a means of promoting the use of rail transit and encouraging a transfer of commuters from car to public transport. This is especially evident in North America, where extensive park and ride facilities have been installed on a number of light and heavy urban rail systems. There is a general consensus about the most suitable types of location for facilities, but less agreement on the development of a reliable method of forecasting demand and also on the required size of sites. Experience in practice indicates that although park and ride is attractive to commuters, schemes do not generally result in lasting reductions in highway congestion, due to rising car ownership and use and the phenomenon of generated traffic.

Key words

parking rapid transit public transport traffic 



West Midlands Passenger Transport Executive


Kiss and ride


Light Rail Transit


Public Transport


Rapid Transit


Transport & Road Research Laboratory, UK


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Butler D (1986) Park and ride in Oxford. In: Bixby R (ed) Integration in Transport — the Role of Park and Ride. Oxford, UK: Oxford Polytechnic.Google Scholar
  2. Calgary Transit (1988) Park ‘n’ Ride Travel. Calgary, Canada.Google Scholar
  3. Committee on Environmental Quality (1976) The Growth Shapers' — Land use Impacts of Infrastructure Investments. Washington. DC: US Government.Google Scholar
  4. Cox M (1982) Bus park and ride: Design guidelines. In: Design Construction and Rehabilitation of Public Transport Facilities. American Society of Civil Engineers, Conference Proceedings.Google Scholar
  5. Felz H (1982) Light rail transit system — Hanover example. Conference Paper, San Diego, USA, 28–30 March.Google Scholar
  6. Keck C & Liou P (1976) Forecasting demand for peripheral park and ride service. In: US Transportation Research Record 563. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  7. Millward C, Coleman A & Dunford J (1974) Passenger transport interchanges on Merseyside: Results and conclusions. Traffic Engineering & Control, August/September.Google Scholar
  8. Morrall J (1987) Transportation planning guidelines for LRT P&R facilities in the NW Corridor. Calgary, Canada: Calgary Transit.Google Scholar
  9. Morrall J (1990) Comparison of successful park and ride lots in US cities and Calgary —urban transit planning, Transit Notes.Google Scholar
  10. Pickett M, Perrett K & Charlton J (1986) Park and ride at Tyne and Wear Metro station —a summary report. Transport & Road Research Laboratory Research Report 40. Crowthorne, UK.Google Scholar
  11. Priest D (1980) Enhancing the development impact of rail transit. Transportation 9.Google Scholar
  12. Rhine-Ruhr (1988) P&R Ausbauprogramm. Rhine-Ruhr, FRG.Google Scholar
  13. Sacramento Regional Transit (1987) Design Guidelines for Bus and Light Rail Facilities. Sacramento: Sacramento TDA.Google Scholar
  14. Simpson B (1987) The True Cost of Keeping on the Rails. The Surveyor 169 (No. 4976): 14–16.Google Scholar
  15. Stuttgart (1987) P&R development programme. Stuttgart, FRG: VVS, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
  16. TRRL (1980) The demand for public transport. (International collaborative study of the factors affecting public transport patronage) Transport & Road Research Laboratory. Crowthorne, UK.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ian S. J. Dickins
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Planning and Landscape, Faculty of the Built EnvironmentBirmingham PolytechnicPerry BarrUK

Personalised recommendations