Climatic Change

, Volume 17, Issue 1, pp 27–47 | Cite as

Laurentian Great Lakes double-CO2 climate change hydrological impacts

  • Thomas E. CroleyII


The Great Lakes Environmental Research Laboratory has developed conceptual daily models for simulating moisture storages in and runoff from the 121 watersheds draining into the Laurentian Great Lakes, over-lake precipitation into each lake, and the heat storages in and evaporation from each lake. We combine these components as net basin supplies for each lake to consider climate change scenarios developed from atmospheric general circulation models (GCMs). Recent scenarios of a doubling of atmospheric Co2, available from the Goddard Institute for Space Studies, the Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory, and Oregon State University are considered by making changes in historical meteorological data similar to the changes observed in the GCMs, observing the impact of the changed data in the model outputs, and comparing outputs to model results using unchanged data, representing comparison to an unchanged atmosphere. This study indicates a 23 to 51% reduction in net basin supplies to all the Great Lakes; there is significant variation in the components of these supplies among the three GCMs. The basins various moisture storages become dryer and the lakes are warmer with associated hydrological impacts.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bolsenga, S. J.: 1977, ‘Lake-Land Precipitation Relationships Using Northern Lake Michigan Data’, J. Appl. Met. 16 (11), 1158–1164.Google Scholar
  2. Bolsenga, S. J.: 1979, ‘Determining Overwater Precipitation from Overland Data: The Methodological Controversy Analyzed’, J. Great Lakes Res. 5(3–4), 301–311.Google Scholar
  3. Bolsenga, S. J. and Hagman, J. C.: 1975, ‘On the Selection of Representative Stations for Thiessen Polygon Networks to Estimate Lake Ontario Overwater Precipitation’, International Field Year for the Great Lakes Bulletin 16, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Rockville, Maryland, pp. 57–62.Google Scholar
  4. Cohen, S. J.: 1986, ‘Impacts of Co2-Induced Climatic Change on Water Resources in the Great Lakes Basin’, Climatic Change 8, 135–153.Google Scholar
  5. Cohen, S. J.: 1987, ‘Sensitivity of Water Resources in the Great Lakes Region to Changes in Temperature, Precipitation, Humidity, and Wind Speed’, Proceedings of the Symposium, The Influence of Climate Change and Climatic Variability on the Hydrologic Regime and Water Resources, IAHS Publ. no. 168, Vancouver, August 1987, pp. 489–499.Google Scholar
  6. Croley, T. E., II: 1982, ‘Great Lakes Basins Runoff Modeling’, NOAA Tech. Memo. ERL GLERL-39, Natl. Tech. Inf. Ser., Springfield, Va. 22161.Google Scholar
  7. Croley, T. E., II: 1983a, ‘Great Lakes Basins (U.S.A.-Canada) Runoff Modeling’, J. Hydrol. 64, 135–158.Google Scholar
  8. Croley, T. E., II: 1983b, ‘Lake Ontario Basin (U.S.A.-Canada) Runoff Modeling’, J. Hydrol. 66, 101–121.Google Scholar
  9. Croley, T. E., II: 1989, ‘Verifiable Evaporation Modeling on the Laurentian Great Lakes’, Wat. Resour. Res. 25(5), 781–792.Google Scholar
  10. Croley, T. E., II and Hartmann, H. C.: 1984, ‘Lake Superior Basin Runoff Modeling’, NOAA Tech. Memo. ERL GLERL-50, Natl. Tech. Inf. Ser, Springfield, Va. 22161.Google Scholar
  11. Croley, T. E., II and Hartmann, H. C.: 1985a, ‘Lake Champlain Water Supply Forecasting’, GLERL Open File Report, Contribution No. 450, Great Lakes Environmental Research Laboratory, Ann Arbor, Michigan.Google Scholar
  12. Croley, T. E., II and Hartmann, H. C.: 1985b, ‘Resolving Thiessen Polygons’, J. Hydrol. 76, 363–379.Google Scholar
  13. Croley, T. E., II and Hartmann, H. C.: 1986, ‘Near-Real-Time Forecasting of Large-Lake Water Supplies; A User's Manual’, NOAA Tech. Memo. ERL GLERL-61, Environmental Research Laboratories, Boulder, Colorado.Google Scholar
  14. Croley, T. E., II and Hartman, H. C.: 1987, ‘Near Real-Time Forecasting of Large Lake Supplies’, J. Wat. Res. Plan. Manag. Div. 113(6), 810–823.Google Scholar
  15. Ghan, S. J. et al.: 1982, ‘A Documentation of the OSU Two-Level Atmospheric GCM’, CRI Report 35, Oregon State Univ.Google Scholar
  16. Hansen, J., Fung, I., Lacis, A., Rind, D., Lebedeff, S., Ruedy, R., Russel, G., and Stone, P.: 1988, ‘Global Climate Changes as Forecast by Goddard Institute for Space Studies Three-Dimensional Model’, J. G. Res. 93, 9341–9364.Google Scholar
  17. Hansen, J., Russell, G., Rind, D., Stone, P., Lacis, A., Lebedeff, S., Ruedy, R., and Travis, L.: 1983, ‘Efficient Three-Dimensional Global Models for Climate Studies: Models I and II’, Monthly Weather Review III(4), 609–662.Google Scholar
  18. Hutchinson, G. E.: 1957, A Treatise on Limnology, Volume I, Part 1 - Geography and Physics of Lakes, John Wiley and Sons, New York, New York.Google Scholar
  19. Manabe, S. and Wetherald, R. T.: 1987, ‘Large-Scale Changes in Soil Wetness Induced by an Increase in Carbon Dioxide’, J. Atmos. Sci. 44, 1211–1235.Google Scholar
  20. Quinn, F. H. and Croley, T. E., II.: 1983, ‘Climatic Water Balance Models for Great Lakes Forecasting and Simulation’, in Preprint Volume: Fifth Conference on Hydrometeorology, American Meteorological Society, Boston, Massachusetts, pp. 218–223.Google Scholar
  21. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: 1984, Potential Climatic Impacts of Increasing Atmospheric Co2 with Emphasis on Water Availability and Hydrology in the United States, EPA Office of Policy, Planning, and Evaluation, Washington, D. C.Google Scholar
  22. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: 1988, The Potential Effects of Global Climate Change on the United States. Draft Report to Congress, J. B. Smith and D. A. Tirpak, Eds., EPA Office of Policy, Planning, and Evaluation, Washington, D. C.Google Scholar
  23. Wilson, J.W.: 1977, ‘Effect of Lake Ontario on Precipitation’, Monthly Weather Review 105, 207–214.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Thomas E. CroleyII
    • 1
  1. 1.Great Lakes Environmental Research Laboratory, National Oceanic and Atmospheric AdministrationAnn ArborU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations