Advertisement

Theory and Decision

, Volume 24, Issue 3, pp 215–223 | Cite as

Rawls and Bentham reconciled

  • Udo Ebert
Article

Abstract

The paper deals with the characterization of a class of social welfare orderings. The social evaluation functions which represent these orderings are separable in the components of the ordered utility vector. The characterization is based on the Strong Pareto Property, Co-cardinality, Continuity and a new Independence Property. Since this class encompasses the utilitarian rule and since there are members of this family which almost coincide with the rules of rank dictatorship this family bridges the gap between pure utilitarianism and rank dictatorship.

Keywords

social choice utilitarian rule rank dictatorship welfare orderings 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aczel, J.: 1966, Lectures on Functional Equations and Their Applications. Academic Press, New York, London.Google Scholar
  2. d'Aspremont, C. and L. Gevers: 1977, ‘Equity and the Informational Basis of Collective Choice’, Review of Economic Studies 44, 199–210.Google Scholar
  3. Debreu, G., 1960, ‘Topological Methods in Cardinal Utility Theory’, in K. J. Arrow, S. Karlin, P. Suppes (eds.), Mathematical Methods in the Social Sciences, Stanford University Press, Stanford.Google Scholar
  4. Deschamps, R. and L. Gevers: 1978, ‘Leximin and Utilitarian Rules: A Joint Characterization’, Journal of Economic Theory 17, 143–163.Google Scholar
  5. Ebert, U.: 1987, ‘A Note on Social Welfare Orderings’, European Economic Review 31, 1145–1147.Google Scholar
  6. Gevers, L.: 1979, ‘On Interpersonal Comparability and Social Welfare Orderings’, Econometrica 47, 75–89.Google Scholar
  7. Maskin, E.: 1978, ‘A Theorem on Utilitarianism’, Review of Economic Studies 45, 93–96.Google Scholar
  8. Roberts, K. W. S.: 1980, ‘Interpersonal Comparability and Social Choice Theory’, Review of Economic Studies 47, 421–439.Google Scholar
  9. Sen, A.: 1974, ‘Rawls versus Bentham: An Axiomatic Examination of the Pure Distribution Problem’, Theory and Decision 4, 301–309.Google Scholar
  10. Sen, A.: 1977, ‘On Weights and Measures: Informational Constraints in Social Welfare Analysis’, Econometrica 45, 1539–1572.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Udo Ebert
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of EconomicsUniversity of BonnBonnFRG

Personalised recommendations