Human Studies

, Volume 9, Issue 2–3, pp 111–151 | Cite as

The routine as achievement

  • Emanuel A. Schegloff


Political Philosophy Modern Philosophy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Button, G., and Casey, N. (1984). Generating topic: The use of topic initial elicitors. In J.M. Atkinson and J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversational analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Coulmas, F., Ed. (1981). Conversational routine: Explorations in standardized communication situations and prepatterned speech. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
  3. Friedman, E. (1979). The telephone book. New York: Power Mad Press.Google Scholar
  4. Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  5. Godard, D. (1977). Same setting, different norms: Phone call beginnings in France and the United States. Language in Society 6: 209–219.Google Scholar
  6. Goffman, E. (1963). Behavior in public places. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  7. Goffman, E. (1971). Relations in public. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  8. Irvine, J.T. (1974). Strategies of status manipulation in the Wolof greeting. In R. Bauman and J. Sherzer (Eds.), Explorations in the ethnography of speaking. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Jefferson, G. (1980). On ‘trouble-premonitory’ response to inquiry. Sociological Inquiry 50: 153–185.Google Scholar
  10. Maynard, D. (1984). Inside plea bargaining. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  11. Sacks, H. (1968). Unpublished lecture, 8 May 1968.Google Scholar
  12. Sacks, H. (1970). Unpublished lecture, 23 January 1970.Google Scholar
  13. Sacks, H. (1975). Everyone has to lie. In B. Blountand M. Sanches (Eds.), Sociocultural dimensions of language use. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  14. Sacks, H. (1984). On doing ‘being ordinary.’ In J.M. Atkinson and J. Heritage (Eds.), Structure of social action: Studies in conversational analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Schank, R.C., and Abelson, R.P. (1977). Scripts, plans, goals, and understanding: An inquiry into human knowledge structures. Hillsdale, N.J.: L. Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  16. Schegloff, E.A. (1967). Unpublished dissertation. Department of Sociology, University of California at Berkeley.Google Scholar
  17. Schegloff, E.A. (1968). Sequencing in conversational openings. American Anthropologist 70: 1075–1095.Google Scholar
  18. Schegloff, E.A. (1970). The social organization of conversational openings. Unpublished ms.Google Scholar
  19. Schegloff, E.A. (1979). Identification and recognition in telephone conversation openings. In G. Psathas (Ed.), Everyday language: Studies in ethnomethodology. New York: Irvington.Google Scholar
  20. Schegloff, E.A. (1980). Preliminaries to preliminaries: “Can I ask you a question?’ Sociological Inquiry 50: 104–152.Google Scholar
  21. Schegloff, E.A., Jefferson, G. and Sacks, H. (1977). The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language 53: 361–382.Google Scholar
  22. Schmidt, R.W. (1975). Sociolinguistic rules and foreign language teaching. Paper presented at the Symposium on Sociolinguistics and Applied Anthropology. Annual meeting of the Society for Applied Anthropology, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  23. Wolfson, N. (1983). Rules of speaking. In J.C. Richards and R. W. Schmidt (Eds.), Language and communication. New York: Longman.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • Emanuel A. Schegloff
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of SociologyUniversity of CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations