Solar Physics

, Volume 117, Issue 2, pp 269–278 | Cite as

Bimodality and the Hale cycle

  • Robert M. Wilson
Article

Abstract

Because of the bimodal distribution of sunspot cycle periods, the Hale cycle (or double sunspot cycle) should show evidence of modulation between 20 and 24 yr, with the Hale cycle having an average length of about 22 yr. Indeed, such a modulation is observed. Comparison of consecutive pairs of cycles strongly suggests that even-numbered cycles are preferentially paired with odd-numbered following cycles. Systematic variations are hinted in both the Hale cycle period and Rsum (the sum of monthly mean sunspot numbers over consecutively paired sunspot cycles). The preferred even-odd cycle pairing suggests that cycles 22 and 23 form a ‘new’ Hale cycle pair (Hale cycle 12), that cycle 23 will be larger than cycle 22 (in terms of RM, the maximum smoothed sunspot number, and of the individual cycle value of Rsum), and that the length of Hale cycle 12 will be longer than 22 yr. Because of the strong correlation (r = 0.95) between individual sunspot cycle values of Rsum and RM, having a good estimate of RMfor the present sunspot cycle (22) allows one to predict its Rsum, which further allows an estimation of both RMand Rsum for cycle 23 and an estimation of Rsum for Hale cycle 12. Based on Wilson's bivariate fit (r = 0.98), sunspot cycle 22 should have an RMequal to 144.4 ± 27.3 (at the 3-σ level), implying that its Rsum should be about 8600 ± 2200; such values imply that sunspot cycle 23 should have an Rsum of about 10500 ± 2000 and an RMof about 175 ± 40, and that Hale cycle 12 should have an Rsum of about 19100 ± 3000.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. De Jager, C: 1959, in S. Flügge (ed.), Encyclopedia of Physics, Vol. LII, Astrophysics III: The Solar System, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, p. 150.Google Scholar
  2. Gnevyshev, M. N. and Ohl, A. I.: 1948, Astron. Zh. 25, 18.Google Scholar
  3. Hale, G. E. and Nicholson, S. B.: 1938, Magnetic Observations of Sunspots, 1917–1924, No. 498, Carnegie Inst., Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  4. Howard, R.: 1977, in A. Bruzek and C. J. Durrant (eds.), Illustrated Glossary for Solar and Solar-Terrestrial Physics, Astrophysics and Space Science Library, Vol. 69, D. Reidel Publ. Co., Dordrecht, Holland, p. 7.Google Scholar
  5. Kiepenheuer, K. O.: 1953, in G. P. Kuiper (ed.), The Sun, The Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago, p. 322Google Scholar
  6. Kopecký, M.: 1967, in Z. Kopal (ed.), Advancesin Astronomy and Astrophysics, Vol. 5, Academic Press, New York, p. 189.Google Scholar
  7. Lapin, L.: 1978, Statistics for Modern Business Decisions, 2nd ed., Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Inc., New York.Google Scholar
  8. McKinnon, J. A.: 1987, Sunspot Numbers: 1610–1985, Report UAG-95, World Data Center A for Solar-Terrestrial Physics, Boulder, Colorado, 112pp.Google Scholar
  9. Rabin, D., Wilson, R. M., and Moore, R. L.: 1986, Geophys. Res. Letters 13, 352.Google Scholar
  10. Sargent, H. H., III: 1978, in Twenty-Eighth IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference, IEEE, Inc., New York, p. 490.Google Scholar
  11. Vitinskii, Yu. I.: 1965, Solar Activity Forecasting, NASA TT F-289, NASA, Washington, D.C., 129 pp.Google Scholar
  12. Waldmeier, M.: 1961, The Sunspot-Activity in the Years 1610–1960, Schulthess and Co., Zürich, Switzerland.Google Scholar
  13. Wilson, R. M. 1987a, Solar Phys. 108, 195.Google Scholar
  14. Wilson, R. M. 1987b, J. Geophys. Res. 92 (A9), 10101.Google Scholar
  15. Wilson, R. M. 1987c, Solar Phys. 111, 255.Google Scholar
  16. Wilson, R. M. 1988a, Solar Phys. 115, 397.Google Scholar
  17. Wilson, R. M. 1988b, Geophys. Res. Letters 15, 125.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert M. Wilson
    • 1
  1. 1.Space Science Laboratory, NASA Marshall Space Flight CenterHuntsvilleU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations