Euphytica

, Volume 54, Issue 1, pp 65–73

Simple approach to the analysis of GxE interactions in a multilocational spaced plant trial with timothy

  • Aslaug Helgadóttir
  • Thórdís A. Kristjánsdóttir
Article

Summary

Sixty genotypes of timothy, comprising 12 genotypes originating from each of five locations, were grown at the same locations in northern Scandinavia and Iceland, as a part of a joint breeding project in timothy. The trials were observed for two years and various characters were evaluated. Large genotype x environment interactions occurred for most characters and the response of individual genotypes. irrespective of origin contributed most to the variation. A superiority measure (P.), based on the genotype's response and the maximum response, averaged over all locations, was used to rank the genotypes with respect to yield and other morphological attributes. Based on this ranking it is possible to choose genotypes which are high yielding and show good stability over the area.

Key words

GxE interactions Phleum pratense spaced plant trials superiority measure timothy yield stability 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Dennis, B. & Á. Helgadóttir, 1988. Breeding herbage species for northern Scandinavia. In: Natural Variation and Breeding for Adaptation, pp. 169–177. Proceedings of the Eucarpia Fodder Crops Section Meeting, Lusignan, France.Google Scholar
  2. Helgadóttir, Á., 1989. Breeding herbage species for northern areas. 1. Variety trials with timothy (Phleum pratense L.). Acta Agric. Scand. 39: 243–254.Google Scholar
  3. Hill, J., 1975. Genotype-environment interactions — a challenge for plant breeding. J. Agric. Sci. Camb. 85: 477–493.Google Scholar
  4. Larsen, A., 1987. Gras-stripebakteriose i timoteikloner. Informasjonsmøte i plantevern 1987. SFFL Nr. 4: 153–158.Google Scholar
  5. Lazenby, A. & H.H. Rogers, 1960. The evaluation of selection indices for yield in grass breeding. Proceedings of the 8th International Grassland Congress, Reading.Google Scholar
  6. Lin, C.S. & M.R., Binns, 1985. Procedural approach for assessing cultivar — location data: Pairwise genotype-environment interactions of test cultivars with checks. Can. J. Plant. Sci. 65: 1065–1071.Google Scholar
  7. Lin, C.S. & M.R., Binns, 1988. A superiority measure of cultivar performance for cultivar x location data. Can. J. Plant. Sci. 68: 193–198.Google Scholar
  8. Lin, C.S., M.R., Binns & L.P., Lefkovitch. 1986. Stability analysis: Where do we stand? Crop Sci. 26: 894–900.Google Scholar
  9. Simonsen, Ö., 1985. Herbage breeding in northern areas. In: A., Kaurin, O., Junttila & J., Nilsen (Eds) Plant Production in the North. pp. 277–295. Norwegian University Press, Oslo.Google Scholar
  10. Westcott, B., 1986. Some methods of analysing genotype-environment interaction. Heredity 56: 243–253.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Aslaug Helgadóttir
    • 1
  • Thórdís A. Kristjánsdóttir
    • 1
  1. 1.The Agricultural Research InstituteReykjavikIceland

Personalised recommendations