Quality and Quantity

, Volume 12, Issue 2, pp 147–167 | Cite as

Reviewing the statistical measures of association for the triple dichotomy

  • Giuseppe Gangemi
Article
  • 23 Downloads

Keywords

Statistical Measure 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

References

  1. Alker, H.R. (1965). Mathematics and Politics. New York: McMillan.Google Scholar
  2. Blalock, H.M. (1960). Social Statistics. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
  3. Costner, H.L. and Wager, L.W. (1965). “The Multivariate Analysis of Dichotomized Variables”, American Journal of Sociology. LXX: 455–466.Google Scholar
  4. Cureton, E.E. (1959). “Note on Phi/Phi max”, Psychometrika. XXIV; 1: 89–91.Google Scholar
  5. Davis, J.A. (1967). “A partial Coefficient for Goodman and Kruskal's Gamma”, Journal of the American Statistical Association LXII: 189–193.Google Scholar
  6. Davis, J.A. (1971). Elementary Survey Analysis. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  7. Edwards, A. (1957). “A note on the Practical Interpretation of 2×2 Tables”, Brit. J. Prev. Soc. Med. XI: 73–78.Google Scholar
  8. Edwards, A. (1963). “The Measures of Association in a 2×2 Table”, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society XXVI, Series A: 109–114.Google Scholar
  9. Gangemi, G. (1977). “Le misure di associazione tra due dicotomie nella ricerca sociale”, Rassegna Italiana di Sociologia XVIII: 599–628.Google Scholar
  10. Goodman, L.A. (1963). “On Method for Comparing Contingency Tables”, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society XXV, Series A: 179–188.Google Scholar
  11. Goodman, L.A. (1964a). “Interactions in Multidimensional Contingency Tables”, Annals of Mathematical Statistics XXXV: 632–646.Google Scholar
  12. Goodman, L.A. (1964b). “Simple Methods for Analysing Three Factor Interactions in Contingency Tables”, Journal of the American Statistical Association LIX: 319–352.Google Scholar
  13. Goodman, L.A. (1965). “On the Multivariate Analysis of Three Dichotomous Variables”, American Journal of Sociology LXXI: 290–301.Google Scholar
  14. Goodman, L.A. (1969). “On Partitioning Chi Square and Detecting Partial Association in Three-Way Contingency Tables”, Journal of The Royal Statistical Society XXX, Series A: 486–498.Google Scholar
  15. Goodman, L.A. (1970). “The Multivariate Analysis of Qualitative Data: Interactions Among Multiple Classifications”, Journal of the American Statistical Association LXV: 226–256.Google Scholar
  16. Goodman, L.A. (1971a). “The Analysis of the Multidimensional Contingency Tables: Stepwise Procedures and Direct Estimation Methods for Building Models for Multiple Classifications”, Technometrics XIII: 33–61.Google Scholar
  17. Goodman, L.A. (1971b). “Partitioning of Chi Square, Analysis of Marginal Contingency Tables and Estimation of Expected Frequencies in Multidimensional Contingency Tables”, Journal of the American Statistical Association LXVI: 339–346.Google Scholar
  18. Goodman, L.A. (1972a). “A General Model for the Analysis of Surveys”, American Journal of Sociology LXXVII: 1035–1086.Google Scholar
  19. Goodman, L.A. (1972b). “A Modified Multiple Regression Approach to the Analysis of Dichotomous Variables”, American Sociological Review XXXVII: 28–46.Google Scholar
  20. Goodman, L.A. and Kruskal, W.H. (1954). “Measures of Association for Cross Classifications, I”, Journal of The American Statistical Association XLIX: 732–764.Google Scholar
  21. Goodman, L.A. and Kruskal, W.H. (1959). “Measures of Association for Cross Classifications, II”, Journal of the American Statistical Association LIV: 123–163.Google Scholar
  22. Goodman, L.A. and Kruskal, W.H. (1963). “Measures of Association for Cross Classifications, III”, Journal of the American Statistical Association LVIII: 310–364.Google Scholar
  23. Korosi, J. (1887). Kritik der Vaccinations-Statistick und Neue Beitrage zur Frage des Impfschutzes, Transactions of the Ninth-International Medical Congress, Washington, Vol. I, 238–418.Google Scholar
  24. McRae, D. (1970). Issues and Parties in Legislative Voting. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  25. Somers, R.H. (1962). “A New Asymmetric Measure of Association for Ordinal Variables”, American Sociological Review XXVII: 799–811.Google Scholar
  26. Somers, R.H. (1964). “Simple Measures of Association for the Triple Dichotomy”, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society CXXVII, Series A: 409–415.Google Scholar
  27. Yule, G.U. (1912). “On the Methods of Measuring Association Between Two Attributes”, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society LXXV, Series A: 579–642.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company 1978

Authors and Affiliations

  • Giuseppe Gangemi

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations