Quality and Quantity

, Volume 15, Issue 4, pp 315–334 | Cite as

Post hoc rides again: A methodological critique of “Fifteen thousand hours: Secondary schools and their effects on children”

  • Peter F. Cuttance
Article

Keywords

Methodological Critique 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Averch, Harvey A., Carroll, S.J., Donaldson, T.S., Kiesling, H.J. and Pincus, J., (1972). How Effective is Schooling? A Critical Review and Synthesis of Research Findings. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation.Google Scholar
  2. Bhaskar, Roy (1979). The Possibility of Naturalism: A Philosophical Critique of the Contemporary Human Sciences. Brighton: Harvester Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bulcock, Jeffrey W., Clifton, Rodney and Beebe, Mona (1977). A Language Resource Model of Science Achievement: Comparisons between 14-year-olds in England and India. Research Report No. 25, Stockholm, Institute for the Study of International Problems in Education, University of Stockholm.Google Scholar
  4. Coleman, J.S. (chairman) (1966). Equality of Educational Opportunity. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  5. Coleman, J.S. (1975). “Methods and results in the IEA studies of effects of school on learning”, Review of Educational Research 45: 336–386.Google Scholar
  6. Cuttance, Peter F. (1979). The Influence of Differences Between Schools on Student Achievement: A Selected Literature Review. Bulletin 133, Institute for Educational Research, University of Jyvaskyla, Finland.Google Scholar
  7. Cuttance, Peter F. (1980). “Social background, aspirations, and academic achievement: an analysis based on longitudinal data for Australia,” Alberta Journal of Educational Research 26 (No. 2).Google Scholar
  8. Jencks, Christopher and Brown, Marsha D. (1975). “Effects of high schools on their students”, Harvard Educational Review 45: 273–324.Google Scholar
  9. Jencks, Christopher, Smith, Marshall, Acland, Henry, Bane, Mary Jo, Cohen, David, Gintis, Herbert, Heyns, Barbara and Michelson, Stephan (1972). Inequality: A Reassessment of the Effect of Family and Schooling in America. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  10. Mackie, J.L. (1965). “Causes and conditions” American Philosophical Quarterly 2: 245–264.Google Scholar
  11. Munck, Ingrid M.E. (1979). Model Building in Comparative Education: Applications of the LISREL Method to Cross-National Survey Data. Stockholm: Almqvist and Wiksell.Google Scholar
  12. Noonan, Richard and Wold, Herman (1977). “NIPALS path modelling with latent variables”, Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 21: 33–61.Google Scholar
  13. Parsons, Talcott (1937). The Structure of Social Action. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar
  14. Plowden, B. (chairman) (1966). Children and their Primary Schools. Report of the Central Advisory Council for Education, London: HMSO, Longmans.Google Scholar
  15. Rutter, Michael, Maughan, Barbara, Mortimore, Peter and Ouston, Janet (1979). Fifteen Thousand Hours: Secondary Schools and their Effects on Children. London: Open Books.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company 1981

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter F. Cuttance

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations