Climatic Change

, Volume 21, Issue 1, pp 37–55 | Cite as

Assessing the sensitivity of Canada's ecosystems to climatic change

  • Brian Rizzo
  • Ed Wiken
Article

Abstract

Global warming due to increased concentrations of atmospheric CO2 is expected to be amplified in middle and higher latitudes. Consequently, ecosystems in these latitudes will experience more pronounced climatic variations. This investigation attempts to assess the sensitivity of Canada's ecosystems to climatic change. Potential ecological impacts resulting from global warming are outlined. With this background, the effects of a doubled CO2 climate are applied to a classification model derived from the current ecological setting. Results reveal not only major shifts in ecological boundaries but also changes in the character of these broadly distributed ecosystems.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bach, W.: 1984, ‘CO2-Sensitivity Experiments Using General Circulation Models’, Prog. Phys. Geography 8, 583–609.Google Scholar
  2. Bolin, B.: 1980, Climatic Changes and their Effects on the Biosphere, Report No. 542, World Meteorological Organisation, Geneva, 49 pp.Google Scholar
  3. Bonan, G. B., Shugart, H. H., and Urban, D. L.: 1990, ‘The Sensitivity of Some High-Latitude Boreal Forests to Climatic Parameters’, Climatic Change 16, 9–29.Google Scholar
  4. Botkin, D. B.: 1973, ‘Estimating the Effects of Carbon Fertilization on Forest Composition by Ecosystem Simulations’, in Woodwell, G. M., and Pecan, E. V. (eds.), Carbon and the Biosphere, Proceedings, 24th Brookhaven Symposium in Biology, CONF-720510, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, Virginia, pp. 328–344.Google Scholar
  5. Botkin, D. B.: 1977, ‘Forests, Lakes and the Anthropogenic Production of Carbon Dioxide’, Bioscience 27, 325–331.Google Scholar
  6. Box, E. O.: 1981, ‘Macro Climatic Plant Forms: An Introduction to Predictive Modeling in Phytogeography’, in Tasks for Vegetation Science 1, Dr W. Junk Publishers, The Hague/Boston/London.Google Scholar
  7. CCELC.: 1987, ‘Climate Change Workshop’, December 1 and 2, 1987.Google Scholar
  8. Davis, M.: 1989, ‘Lags in Vegetation Response to Greenhouse Warming’, Climatic Change 15, 75–82.Google Scholar
  9. Ecoregions Working Group: 1989, ‘Ecoclimatic Regions of Canada, First Approximation’, Ecoregions Working Group of the Canada Committee on Ecological Land Classification, Ecological Land Classification Series, No. 23, Sustainable Development Branch, Canadian Wildlife Service, Conservation and Protection, Environment Canada, Ottawa, Ontario. 119 pp. and map at 1:7 500 000.Google Scholar
  10. Emanuel, W. R., Shugart, H. H., and Stevenson, M. P.: 1985a, ‘Climatic Change and the Broad-Scale Distribution of Terrestrial Ecosystem Complexes’, Climatic Change 7, 29–43.Google Scholar
  11. Emanuel, W. R., Shugart, H. H., and Stevenson, M. P.: 1985b, ‘Response to Comment: Climatic Change and the Broad-Scale Distribution of Terrestrial Ecosystem Complexes’, Climatic Change 7, 457–460.Google Scholar
  12. Grotch, S. L. and MacCracken, M. C.: 1988, ‘Comparison of Model Simulations from Four General Circulation Models’, Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Centre Communications, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, 14 pp.Google Scholar
  13. Hand, D. J.: 1981, Discrimination and Classification, John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York.Google Scholar
  14. Hansen, J., Johnson, D., Lacis, A., Lebedeff, S., Lee, P., Rind, D., and Russell, G.: 1981, ‘Climate Impacts of Increasing CO2’, Science 213, 957.Google Scholar
  15. Hansen, J., Russell, G., Rind, D., Stone, P., Lacis, A., Lebedeff, S., Ruedy, R., and Travis, L.: 1983, ‘Efficient Three-Dimensional Global Models for Climate Studies: Models I and II’, Mon. Weather Rev. III, 609–662.Google Scholar
  16. Hansen, J., Fung, L., Lacis, A., Rind, D., Lebedeff, S., Ruedy, R., Russell, G., and Stone, P.: 1988, ‘Global Climate Changes as Forecasted by Goddard Institute for Space Studies Three-Dimensional Model’, J. Geophys. Res. 93 (D8), 9341–9464.Google Scholar
  17. Holdridge, L. R.: 1947, ‘Determination of World Plant Formations from Simple Climate Data’, Science 105, 367–368.Google Scholar
  18. Jenny, H.: 1941, Factors of Soil Formation, McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  19. Johnston, R. J.: 1978, Multivariate Statistical Analysis in Geography, Longman Group Ltd., London, 280 pp.Google Scholar
  20. Kauppi, P. and Posch, M.: 1985, ‘Sensitivity of Boreal Forests to Possible Climatic Warming’, Climatic Change 7 (1), 45–54.Google Scholar
  21. Klecka, W. R.: 1980, Discriminant Analysis, Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences Series, No. 19, Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, California.Google Scholar
  22. Koppen, W.: 1931, Grunde der Klimakunde, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin.Google Scholar
  23. Luther, F. M.: 1985, ‘Projecting the Climatic Effects of Increasing Carbon Dioxide: Volume Summary’, in MacCracken, M. C. and Luther, F. M. (eds.), Detecting the Climatic Effects of Increasing Carbon Dioxide, United States Department of Energy, Carbon Dioxide Research Division, Washington D.C.Google Scholar
  24. Manabe, S. and Stouffer, R. J.: 1980, ‘Sensitivity of a Global Climate Model to an Increase of CO2 Concentration in the Atmosphere’, J. Geophys. Res. 85, 5529–5554.Google Scholar
  25. Olson, J. S., Watts, J. A., and Allison, L. J.: 1983, ‘Carbon in Live Vegetation of Major World Ecosystems’, (ORNL/TM-5862), Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee.Google Scholar
  26. Pastor, J. and Post, W. M.: 1988, Response of Northern Forests to CO2-Induced Climatic Change’, Nature 334, 55–58.Google Scholar
  27. Rind, D. and Lebedeff, S.: 1984, ‘Potential Impacts of Increased CO2 with Emphasis on Water Availability and Hydrology in the United States’, Report prepared for the Environmental Protection Agency, NASA Goddard Space Flight Centre Institute for Space Studies, New York, NY, 96 pp.Google Scholar
  28. Rizzo, B.: 1987, ‘An Ecological Scenario of Climatic Change for Canada: An Application of the Holdridge Life-Zone Model’ (unpublished paper).Google Scholar
  29. SAS.: 1985, ‘Statistical Analysis System’, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, U.S.A.Google Scholar
  30. Shugart, H. H. and West, D. G: 1980, ‘Forest Succession Models’, Bio Science 30, 308–313.Google Scholar
  31. Solomon, A. M.: 1986, ‘Transient Response of Forests to CO2-Induced Climatic Change: Simulation Modeling Experiments in Eastern North America’, Oecologia (Berlin) 68, 567–579.Google Scholar
  32. Tuhkanen, S.: 1984, ‘A Cirumboreal System of Climatic-Phytogeographic Regions’, Acta Bot. Fennica 127, 1–50.Google Scholar
  33. Tydac: 1988, ‘Spatial Analysis Systems (SPANS), Version 4’, Tydac Technologies Inc. Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.Google Scholar
  34. Walter, H.: 1984, Vegetation of the Earth and Ecological Systems of ‘the Geo-Biosphere’, Springer-Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
  35. Wheaton, E. E., Singh, T., Dempster, R., Higginbotham, K. O., Thorpe, J. P., VanKooten, G. C., and Taylor, J. S.: 1987, An Exploration and Assessment of the Implications of Climatic Change for the Boreal Forest and Forestry Economics of the Prairie Provinces and Northwest Territories: Phase One, SRC publication E-906-36-B-87. SRC Technical Report 211.Google Scholar
  36. Whittaker, R. H. and Likens, G. E.: 1975, ‘The Biosphere and Man’, in H. Lieth and R. H. Whittaker (eds.), Primary Productivity of the Biosphere, Ecol. Studies 14, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, pp. 305–328.Google Scholar
  37. Williams, G. D. and Masterton, J. M.: 1983, ‘An Application of Principal Component Analysis and an Agroclimatic Resource Index to Ecological Land Classification for Alberta’, Climatological Bulletin 17, 3–28.Google Scholar
  38. Zoltai, S. C.: 1988, ‘Ecoclimatic Provinces of Canada and Man-Induced Climatic Change’, Newsletter, Canada Committee on Ecological Land Classification 17, 12–5.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Brian Rizzo
    • 1
  • Ed Wiken
    • 1
  1. 1.Ecological Applications Research DivisionState of the Environment Reporting, Environment CanadaOttawaCanada

Personalised recommendations