Agroforestry Systems

, Volume 14, Issue 1, pp 39–63 | Cite as

Analysis and evaluation of agroforestry as an alternative environmental design in the Philippines

  • P. C. TaboraJr.


Tabora, Panfilo C. Analysis and evaluation of agroforestry as an alternative environmental design in the Philippines.

Agroforestry as a land-use concept and an environmental design was analyzed and evaluated from the Philippines setting. A historical perspective of agroforestry was presented and the study explores the direction that agroforestry has taken in recent years as a socio-economic tool, a conservation strategy and a political expediency.

The concepts of agroforestry were analyzed and used as the bases for evaluation. Five general socially-oriented concepts were examined: social relevance (appropriateness); profitability; balance (equilibrium); versatility and creativity; and longevity and reliability. These were related to five agroecosystem principles: ecological integrity; productivity; stability; flexibility and resiliency; and sustainability and conservation. All these were interrelated to many attributes under a unified ‘Agroecosystem Analysis Framework’.

Seven current programs in the Philippines which promote agroforestry were also examined and evaluated based on the Agroecosystem Analysis Framework. A closer look at the impacts of the programs was done and ratings were given for each program. The Multiple Cropping Program and the Integrated Social Forestry Program came out with the most positive results.

For a closer focus, a site was selected and five cases from the site were evaluated based on a reconstruction of the events and experience in the area over 14 years. The Mixed-Crops Agroforestry (representing the ideal agroforestry) came out with a rating equivalent to the Coconut and Abaca-based Agroforestry. The Industrial Tree Plantation came out with the lowest rating.

The study concludes that agroforestry has a role as an environmental design, but that its usefulness has limitations due to some physical constraints and social and economic values that have to be overcome. Recommendations are provided for policy-making for agroforestry.

Key words

agroforestry analysis and evaluation environmental design agroecosystem 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Ahern G (1927) Annual Report of the Philippine Commission. GOB Washington, DC, 71 ppGoogle Scholar
  2. Anon (1964) National Conference on Kaingin Problems, 1964 UPLB College of Forestry. PhilippinesGoogle Scholar
  3. Budowski G (1980) The place of agroforestry in managing tropical forests: utilization and conservation. Yale University, New Haven, April 15–16, 1980Google Scholar
  4. Budowski G (1981) Agroforestry in Central America. Proc. of a seminar at CATIE, Costa Rica. Feb 23-March 3, 1981Google Scholar
  5. Conrad M (1983) Adaptability. Plenum Press, NY, p 183Google Scholar
  6. Conway G. Agroecosystem analysis. Imperial College of Science and Technology, London, 17 ppGoogle Scholar
  7. Dahl AL (1984) Biogeographical aspects of isolation in the Pacific. Ambio 13 (5–6): 302–305Google Scholar
  8. Dubos R (1978) The resilience of ecosystems, an ecological view of environmental restoration. Colorado Univ Press, 30 ppGoogle Scholar
  9. ICRAF (1978) As cited by Heuveldop J and J Lagemann, 1981. Agroforestry, Proc of a Seminar. CATIE, Turrialba, Costa Rica, p 8, and Spurgeon D 1979. Agroforestry, a new hope for subsistence farms. Nature 280: 533–534Google Scholar
  10. International Labor Organization/Bureau of Forest Development (Phil)/Government of Finland. 1982. Implementation of appropriate technology in Philippine forestry. Project Report. World Employment Programme, ILOGoogle Scholar
  11. Leopold LB, Clark FE, Hanshaw BB and Balsley JR (1971) A procedure for evaluating environmental impact. Geological Survey. Circular 645. US Dept of Interior, Washington DC, 13 ppGoogle Scholar
  12. Ricklefs R (1976) The economy of nature. Chiron Press. p 217Google Scholar
  13. Roque CR (1977) Concepts for environmental management in the seventies. National Environmental Protection Council. Philippines June 6–7, 1977Google Scholar
  14. Starfield AM and Bleloch AL (1983) Expert systems: an approach to problems in ecological management that are difficult to quantify. J Environ Management 16: 269–280Google Scholar
  15. Vergara NT (1982) New directions in agroforestry: the potential of tropical legume trees. East-West Center and UN UniversityGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. C. TaboraJr.
    • 1
  1. 1.Honduran Foundation for Agricultural ResearchSan Pedro SulaHonduras

Personalised recommendations