Advertisement

Documenta Ophthalmologica

, Volume 48, Issue 2, pp 373–388 | Cite as

Vertebrate receptor optics and orientation

  • Jay M. Enoch
Article

Abstract

Vertebrate photoreceptors act as optical waveguides. They exhibit directionality, non-uniform distribution of energy within and immediately about the receptor, etc. Photolabile pigment absorption favors light traveling axially down the receptor. Clearly these properties influence response of the transducer. Retinal receptors, rods and cones, are aligned normally with a point approximating the center of the exit pupil of the eye. Taken together, these findings suggest that a prime role of receptor optics is to favor acceptance of the pertinent visual stimulus passing through the pupillary aperture and to inhibit stray light noise contained in the integrating spherelike eyes.

Many intriguing problems remain to be resolved. It is necessary to relate the properties of the receptor as a waveguide to determinations of directional sensitivity of the retina (Stiles-Crawford effects), and in particular, to understand mechanisms leading to fine receptor alignment. There must also be a pathology of receptor orientation - a science still its infancy.

Keywords

Retina Outer Segment Directional Sensitivity Pupil Center Exit Pupil 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bailey, J.E. Directional Sensivity of Retinal Receptors, Dissertation, Indiana Univ., Bloomington, Indiana, 1974.Google Scholar
  2. Bailey, J.E. The Orientation Properties of Retinal Rods. Optom. Weekly 63: No. 19, 32–33 (1972).Google Scholar
  3. Barer, R. Refractometry and Interferometry of Living Cells. J. Optical Soc. Amer. 47: 545–556 (1957).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bedell, H.E. & Enoch, J.M. A Study of the Stiles-Crawford Function at 35° in the Temporal Field. J. Optical Soc. Amer. (in press). See also Enoch, J.M. & Hope, G.M. Investigative Ophthal. 12: 497–503 (1973).Google Scholar
  5. Benson, W.E. et al. Best's Vitelliform Macular Dystrophy. Amer. J. Ophthal. 79: 59–66 (1975).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Campos, E., Bedell, H., Enoch, J. & Fitzgerald, C. Retinal Receptive Field-like Properties and Stiles-Crawford Effect Followed in a Patient with Traumatic Choroidal Rupture. Documenta Ophthal. 45: 381–395 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Coble, J. & Rushton, W.A.H. Stiles-Crawford Effect and the Bleaching of Cone Pigments. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 217: 231–242 (1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Enoch, J.M. The Current Status of Receptor Amblyopia. Documenta Ophthal. 23: 130–148 (1967).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Enoch, J.M. Marked Accommodation, Retinal Stretch, Monocular Space Perception and Retinal Receptor Orientation, Charles F. Prentice Lecture, 1974. Amer. J. Optom. and Physiol. Opt. 52: 375–392 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Enoch, J.M. Nature of the Transmission of Energy in the Retinal Receptors. J. Optical Soc. Amer. 51: 1122–1126 (1961).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Enoch, J.M. Optical Properties of the Retinal Receptors. J. Optical Soc. Amer. 53: 71–85 (1963).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Enoch, J.M. Retinal Directional Resolution: In Visual Science (Edited by J. Pierce and J. Levine), Indiana Univ. Press, Bloomington, Indiana, 1971.Google Scholar
  13. Enoch, J.M. Retinal Receptor Orientation and the Role of Fiber Optics in Vision, First Glenn A. Fry lecture. Amer. J. Optom. 49: 455–470 (1972).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Enoch, J.M. Vertebrate Receptor Orientation. Int. J. Quantum Chem.: Quantum Biology Symp. No. 3: 65–88 (1976).Google Scholar
  15. Enoch, J.M. Vertebrate Rod Receptors Are Directionally Sensitive. In Photoreceptor Optics (Edited by A. Snyder and R. Menzel), Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1975, pp. 17–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Enoch, J.M., Bedell, H. & Campos, E. Local Variations in Rod Receptor Orientation. Vision Research 18: 123–124 (1978).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Enoch, J.M. & Glismann, L. Physical and Optical Changes in Excised Retinal Tissue. Investigative Ophthal. 5: 208–221 (1966).Google Scholar
  18. Enoch, J.M. & Horowitz, B. The Vertebrate Retinal Receptor as a Waveguide. In Proc. Polytech. Inst. of New York Microwave Research Inst. Symp. 23. Polytechnic Press, New York, 1974, pp. 133–159.Google Scholar
  19. Enoch, J.M. & Scandrett, J. Human Far Field Radiation Pattern. Investigative Ophthal. 10: 167–170 (1911).Google Scholar
  20. Enoch, J.M., Scandrett, J. & Tobey, F.L. Jr. A Study of the Effects of Bleaching on the Width and Index of Refraction of Frog Rod Outer Segments. Vision Research 13: 171–183 (1973).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Enoch, J.M. & Tobey, F.L., Jr. Special Microscope Microspectrophotometer: Optical Design and Application to the Determination of Waveguide Properties of Frog Rods. J. Optical Soc. Amer. 63: 1345–1356 (1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Enoch, J.M. & Tobey, F.L., Jr. Use of the Waveguide Parameter V to Determine Difference in the Index of Refraction Between the Rat Rod Outer Segment and the Interstitial Matrix. J. Optical Soc. Amer. 68: 1130–1134 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fineran, B. & Nicol, J.A.C. Studies on the Eyes of Anchovies (Anchoa Mitchilli and A. Hepsetus Engraulidae) with Particular Reference to the Pigment Epithelium. Philosophical Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond., Biol. Series 276: 321–350 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fitzgerald, C., Enoch, J., Campos E. & Bedell, H. Comparison of Changes in Visual Functions in Two Cases of Senile Macular Degeneration. A. Von Graefe's Arch. Klin. exp. Ophthal. 210: 79–91 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Von Helmholtz, H. Treatise on Physiological Optics, 3rd Edition, Translated by J. Southall, Dover Publications, New York, 1962. See Volume 1. p. 18 (Czermak's Orthoscope); Volume 2, p. 35 (Perceived distortion of fine grid lines).Google Scholar
  26. Kapany, N., Fiber Optics, In Strong, John, Concepts of Classical Optics, W.H. Freeman and Co., San Francisco, 1958, pp. 553–579.Google Scholar
  27. Laties, A.M. Histological Techniques for Study of Photoreceptor Orientation. Tissue and Cell 1: 63–81 (1969).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Laties, A.M. & Enoch, J.M. An Analysis of Retinal Receptor Orientation I. Angular Relationships of Neighboring Photoreceptors, Investigative Ophthal. 10: 69–77 (1971).Google Scholar
  29. Locket, N.A. Retinal Anatomy of Some Scopelarchid Deep Sea Fishes: Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond., Series B, 178: 161–184 (1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Machemer, R., Experimental Retinal Detachment in the Owl Monkey. IV. The Reattached Retina. Amer. J. Ophthal. 66: 1075–1091 (1968).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. McRenolds, J.S. & Gorman, A. Photoreceptor Potentials of Opposite Polarity in the Eye of the Scallop, Pecten Irradians. J. Gen. Physiol. 56: 376–406, 392–406 (1970).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mellerio, J. Light Absorption and Scatter in the Human Lens. Vision Research 11: 129–141 (1971). See also, Weale, R. Vision Research 1: 183–191 (1961).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Ohzu, H. & Enoch, J.M. Optical Modulation by the Isolated Human Fovea. Vision Research 12: 245–251 (1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ohzu, H., Enoch, J.M. & O'Hair, J. Optical Modulation by the Isolated Retina and Retinal Receptors. Vision Research 12: 231–244 (1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sidman, R.L. The Structure and Concentration of Solids in Photoreceptor Cells studied by Refractometry and Interference Microscopy. J. Biophysical and Biochem. Cytol. 3: 15–30 (1957).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Snyder, A.W. & Menzel, R. Photoreceptor Optics, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Steinberg, R. & Wood, I. Pigment Epithelial Cell Ensheathment of Cone Outer Segments in the Retina of the Domestic Cat. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond., Series B. 187: 461–478 (1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Steinberg, R., Wood, I. & Hogan, N. Pigment Ensheathment and Phagocytosis of Extrafoveal Cones in Human Retina. Philosophical Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond. Biological Ser. 277: 459–474 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Stiles, W.S. The Directional Sensitivity of the Retina. Annals Royal College Surgeons of England 30: 73–101 (1962).Google Scholar
  40. Tobey, F.L. Jr., Enoch, J. & Scandrett, J. Experimentally Determined Optical Properties of Goldfish Cones and Rods. Investigative Ophthal. 14: 7–23 (1975).Google Scholar
  41. Webb, N.G. Orientation of Retinal Rod Receptor Membranes in the Intact Eye Using X-ray Diffraction. Vision Research 17: 625–631 (1977).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Westheimer, G. Dependence of the Magnitude of the Stiles-Crawford Effect on Retinal Location. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 192: 309–315 (1967).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Dr. W. Junk b.v.-Publishers 1979

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jay M. Enoch
    • 1
  1. 1.Center for Sensory Studies University of Florida College of MedicineGainesvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations