Topoi

, Volume 8, Issue 2, pp 105–110 | Cite as

Brentano's criticism of the correspondence conception of truth and Tarski's semantic theory

  • Jan Woleński

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. Brentano, F.: 1874, Psychologie vom empirischen Standpunkt, Meiner, Leipzig; 2nd enlarged ed. Meiner, Leipzig 1924–1928.Google Scholar
  2. Brentano, F.: 1925, Versuch über Erkenntnis, Meiner, Leipzig.Google Scholar
  3. Brentano, F.: 1930, Wahrheit und Evidenz, Meiner, Leipzig.Google Scholar
  4. Kamitz, R., ‘Franz Brentano: Wahrheit und Evidenz’, in: J. Speck, ed., Grundproblemem der grossen Philosophen. Philosophie der Neuzeit III, Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, Göttingen.Google Scholar
  5. Kastil, A.: 1951, Die Philosophie Franz Brentano, Francke, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
  6. Kokoszyńska, M.: 1936, ‘Über den absoluten Wahrheitsbegriff und einige andere semantische Begriffe’, Erkenntnis 6, 143–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Kokoszyńska, M.: 1948, ‘What means “relativity of truth”?’, Studia Philosophica 3, 167–176.Google Scholar
  8. Kokoszyńska, M.: 1951, ‘A refutation of the relativism of truth’, Studia Philosophica 4, 1–57.Google Scholar
  9. Stegmüller, W.: 1957, Das Wahrheitsproblem und die Idee der Semantik, Springer, Wien.Google Scholar
  10. Stumpf, C.: 1939, Erkenntnislehre, vol. I., Barth, Leipzig.Google Scholar
  11. Tarski, A.: 1933, Pojęcie prawdy w językach nauk dedukcyjnych, Warszawskie Towarzystwo Naukowe, Warszawa.Google Scholar
  12. Tarski, A.: 1935, ‘Der Wahrheitsbegriff in den formalisierten Sprachen’, Studia Philosophica 1, 261–405; English translation in: Tarski [1983], 153–278.Google Scholar
  13. Tarski: 1944, ‘The semantic conception of truth and the foundations of semantics’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 4, 341–375; reprinted in Tarski [1986], vol, II, 661–669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Tarski, A.: 1969, ‘Truth and proof’, Scientific American 220, no. 6, 63–77; reprinted in Tarski [1986], vol. IV, 399–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Tarski, A.: 1983, Logic, Semantics, Metamathematics, 2nd. ed., Hackett, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
  16. Tarski, A.: 1986, Collected Papers, 4 vols., Birkhäuser, Basel.Google Scholar
  17. Weingartner, P.: 1978, ‘Brentano's criticism of the correspondence theory of truth and the principle ens et verum convertuntur’, Grazer Philosophische Studien 5, 183–195.Google Scholar
  18. Weingartner, P.: 1979, ‘Ens et verum convertuntur’, Freiburger Zeitschrift für Philosophie und Theologie 26, 145–162.Google Scholar
  19. Woleński, J. and Simons, P.: 1989, ‘De veritate: Austro—Polish contributions to the theory of truth from Brentano to Tarski’, in: K. Szaniawski, ed., The Lvov-Warsaw School and the Vienna Circle, Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1988, 391–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jan Woleński
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Philosophy The Jagiellonian UniversityKrakówPoland

Personalised recommendations