Climatic Change

, Volume 19, Issue 3, pp 271–282 | Cite as

On predicting the response of forests in eastern North America to future climatic change

  • Edward R. Cook
  • Julie Cole


Our ability to accurately predict the response of forests in eastern North America to future climatic change is limited by our knowledge of how different tree species respond to climate. When the climatic response of eastern hemlock is modeled across its range, we find that the assumed climatic response used in simulation models is not sufficient to explain how this species is presently responding to climate. This is also the case for red spruce growing in the northern Appalachian Mountains. Consequently, simulations of future change to forests that include eastern hemlock and red spruce may need to be improved. We suspect that similar findings will be made when other tree species are studied in detail using tree-ring analysis. If so, our present understanding of how individual tree species respond to climate may not be adequate for accurately predicting future changes to these forests. Tree-ring analysis can increase our understanding of how climate affects tree growth in eastern North America and, hence, provide the knowledge necessary to produce more accurate predictions.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Adams, M. S. and Loucks, O. L.: 1971, ‘Summer Air Temparatures as a Factor Affecting Net Photosynthesis and Distribution of Eastern Hemlock (Tsuga canadensis (L.) Carriere) in Southwestern Wisconsin’, Amer. Mid. Nat. 85, 1–10.Google Scholar
  2. Blasing, T. J., Duvick, D. N., and West, D. C.: 1981, ‘Dendroclimatic Calibration and Verification Using Regionally Averaged and Single Station Precipitation Data’, Tree-Ring Bull. 41, 37–44.Google Scholar
  3. Boden, T. A.: 1987, United States Historical Climatology Network (HCN) Serial Temperature and Precipitation Data, Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee.Google Scholar
  4. Botkin, D. B., Janak, J. F., and Wallis, J. R.: 1972, ‘Some Ecological Consequences of a Computer Model of Forest Growth’, J. Ecology 60, 849–872.Google Scholar
  5. Box, G. E. P. and Jenkins, G. W.: 1970, Time Series Analysis: Forecasting and Control, Holden-Day, New York.Google Scholar
  6. Cook, E. R.: 1987, ‘The Decomposition of Tree-ring Series for Environmental Studies’, Tree-Ring Bull. 47, 37–59.Google Scholar
  7. Cook, E. R. and Johnson, A. H.: 1989, ‘Climate Change and Forest Decline: A Review of the Red Spruce Case’, Water, Air, and Soil Pollution 48, 127–140.Google Scholar
  8. Cook, E. R., Johnson, A. H., and Blasing, T. J.: 1987, ‘Forest Decline: Modeling the Effect of Climate in Tree Rings’, Tree Physiol. 3, 27–40.Google Scholar
  9. Davis, M. B.: 1981, ‘Quarternary History and Stability of Deciduous Forests’, in: West, D.C., Shugart, H. H., and Botkin, D. B. (eds.), Forest Succession, Springer-Verlag, New York. pp. 132–177.Google Scholar
  10. Davis, M. B., Woods, K. D., Webb, S. L., and Futyma, R. P.: 1986, ‘Dispersal Versus Climate: Expansion of Fagus and Tsuga into the Upper Great Lakes Region’, Vegetatio 67, 93–103.Google Scholar
  11. Emanuel, W. R., Shugart, H. H., and Stevenson, M. P.: 1985, ‘Climatic Change and the Broad-Scale Distribution of Terrestrial Ecosystem Complexes’, Climatic Change 7, 29–43.Google Scholar
  12. Federer, C. A., Tritton, L. M., Hornbeck, J. W., and Smith, R. B.: 1989, ‘Physiologically Based Dendro-climate Models for Effects of Weather on Red Spruce Basal-area Growth’, Agric. For. Met. 46, 159–172.Google Scholar
  13. Fowells, H. A.: 1965, Silvics of Forest Trees of the United States, Agricultural Handbook No. 271, U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  14. Friesner, R. C. and Potzger, J. E.: 1936, ‘Soil Moisture and the Nature of the Tsuga and Tsuga-Pinus Forest Associations in Indiana’, Butler Univ. Bot. Stud. 3, 207–209.Google Scholar
  15. Fritts, H. C.: 1976, Tree Rings and Climate, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  16. Hansen, J., Lacis, A., Rind, D., Russell, G., Fung, I., Ashcraft, P., Lebdeff, S., Ruedy, R., and Stone, P.: 1986, ‘The Greenhouse Effect: Projections of Global Climate Change’, in: Titus, J. G. (ed.), Effects of Changes in Stratospheric Ozone and Global Climate, Vol. 1: Overview, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and United Nations Environment Programme, pp. 199–218.Google Scholar
  17. Johnson, A. H., Cook, E. R., and Siccama, T. G.: 1988, ‘Climate and Red Spruce Growth and Decline in the Northern Appalachians’, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 85, 5369–5373.Google Scholar
  18. Karl, T. R. and Koscielny, A. J.: 1983, ‘Drought in the United States’, J. Clim. 2, 313–329.Google Scholar
  19. Kavanagh, K. and Kellman, M.: 1986, ‘Performance of Tsuga canadensis (L.) Carr. at the Centre and Northern Edge of its Range: A Comparison’, J. Biogeog. 13, 145–157.Google Scholar
  20. Kozlowski, T. T.: 1971, Growth and Development of Trees, Vol. II, Cambial Growth, and Reproductive Growth, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  21. Kramer, P. J. and Kozlowski, T. T.: 1979, Physiology of Woody Plants, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  22. Manabe, S. and Wetherald, R. T.: 1980, ‘On the Distribution of Climate Change Resulting from an Increase in CO2-Content of the Atmosphere’, J. Atmos. Sci. 37, 99–118.Google Scholar
  23. Mitchell, J. F. B.: 1983, ‘The Seasonal Response of a General Circulation Model to Changes in CO2 and Sea Temperatures’, Quart. J. Royal Met. Soc. 109, 113–152.Google Scholar
  24. Monserud, R. A.: 1986, ‘Time-series Analysis of Tree-ring Chronologies’, For. Sci. 32, 349–372.Google Scholar
  25. Oosting, H. J. and Hess, D. W.: 1965, ‘Microclimate and Relict Stand of Tsuga canadensis in the Lower Piedmont of North Carolina’, Ecology 37, 28–39.Google Scholar
  26. Palmer, W. C.: 1965, Meteorological Drought, Weather Bureau Res. Pap. No. 45, U.S. Dept. Commerce, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  27. Rind, D., Goldberg, R., Hansen, J., Rosenzweig, C., and Ruedy, R.: 1990, ‘Potential Evapotranspiration and the Likelihood of Future Drought’, J. Geophys. Res. (in press).Google Scholar
  28. Rogers, R. S.: 1978, ‘Forests Dominated by Hemlock (Tsuga canadensis): Distribution as Related to Site and Postsettlement History’, Can. J. Bot. 56, 843–853.Google Scholar
  29. Schlesinger, M. E. and Mitchell, J. F. B.: 1985, ‘Model Projections of the Equilibrium Climatic Response to Increased Carbon Dioxide’, in MacCracken, M. C. and Luther, F. M. (eds.), The Potential Climatic Effects of Increasing Carbon Dioxide, U.S. Dept. of Energy Document DOE/ER-0237, pp. 81–148.Google Scholar
  30. Shugart, H. H. and West, D. C.: 1977, ‘Development of an Appalachian Deciduous Forest Succession Model and its Application to Assessment of the Impact of the Chestnut Blight’, J. Envir. Manag. 5, 161–179.Google Scholar
  31. Solomon, A.: 1986, ‘Transient Response of Forests to CO2-Induced Climatic Change: Simulation Modeling Experiments in Eastern North America’, Oecologia 68, 567–579.Google Scholar
  32. Wigley, T. M. L., Jones, P. D., and Kelly, P. M.: 1980, ‘Scenario for a Warm, High-CO2 World’, Nature 283, 17–21.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Edward R. Cook
    • 1
  • Julie Cole
    • 1
  1. 1.Tree-Ring Laboratory, Lamont-Doherty Geological Observatory of Columbia UniversityPalisadesUSA

Personalised recommendations