Advertisement

Topoi

, Volume 2, Issue 1, pp 111–119 | Cite as

The difficulty with the well-formedness of ontological statements

  • Guido Küng
Article
  • 37 Downloads

Abstract

When Russell argued for his ontological convictions, for instance that there are negative facts or that there are universals, he expressed himself in English. But Wittgenstein must have noticed that from the point of view of Russell's ideal language these ontological statements appear to be pseudo-propositions. He believed therefore that what these statements pretend to say, could not really be said but only shown. Carnap discovered a way out of this mutism: what in the material mode of speech of the object language looks like a pseudo-proposition can be translated into a perfectly meaningful proposition in the formal mode of speech (in the metalinguistic mode of speech of the logical syntax of language). But is this ascent into the metalanguage necessary? Taking advantage of Lésniewski's logical system there exists another way outwe can expand the number of categories of our ideal language. But Leśniewski's formulas raise another profound problem, the problem of “semantical muteness” (cf. W. G. Lycan ‘Semantic Competence and Funny Functors’ Monist 64 (1979), 209–222).

Keywords

Semantical Category Individual Object Ordinary Language Ontological Statement True Sentence 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. Carnap, R.: The Logical Syntax of Language, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, 1959.Google Scholar
  2. Church, A.: ‘A Formulation of the Simple Theory of Types’, Journal of Symbolic Logic 5 (1940), 56–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Devitte, M., Armstrong, D.M., and Quine, W. V.: Symposium: ‘Nominalism’, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 61 (1980), 433–451.Google Scholar
  4. Heck, W. C. and Lycan, W. G.: ‘Frege's Horizontal’, Canadian Journal of Philosophy 9 (1979), 479–492.Google Scholar
  5. Henry, D. P.: Medieval Logic and Metaphysics, Hutchinson University Library, London, 1972.Google Scholar
  6. Küng, G.: Ontology and the Logistic Analysis of Language, Synthese Library, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, 1967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Küng, G.: ‘Concrete and Abstract Properties’, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 5 (1964), 31–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Küng, G. and Canty, J. T.: ‘Substitutional Quantification and Lesniewskian Quantifiers’, Theoria 36 (1970), 165–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Küng, G.: ‘Prologue-functors’, Journal of Philosophical Logic 3 (1974), 241–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Küng, G.: ‘The Meaning of the Quantifiers in the Logic of Leśniewski’, Studia Logica 36 (1977), 309–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Küng, G.: ‘Nominalistische Logik heute’, Allgemeine Zeitschrift für Philosophie 2 (1977), No. 1, 29–52.Google Scholar
  12. Küng, G.: ‘Wittgensteins nominalistischer Mystizismus’, in E. Leinfellner and W. Leinfellner, H. Berghel, and A. Hübner (eds.), Wittgenstein and His Impact on Contemporary Thought, Proceedings of the 2nd International Wittgenstein Symposium 1977, Hölder-Pichler-Tempsky, Vienna, 1978, pp. 239–241.Google Scholar
  13. Küng, G.: ‘Leśniewski's Systems’, in W. Marciszewski (ed.), Dictionary of Logic, Nijhoff International Philosophy Series, The Hague, 1981, pp. 168–177.Google Scholar
  14. Küng, G.: ‘Abélard et les vues actuelles sur la question des universaux’, in Cahiers de la Revue de théologie et philosophie, No. 6 (1981), pp. 99–113.Google Scholar
  15. Lejewski, C.: ‘Proper Names’, Proceeding of the Aristotelian Society, suppl. Vol. 31 (1957), pp. 229–256.Google Scholar
  16. Lejewski, C.: ‘Zu Leśniewskis Ontologie’, Ratio 1 (1957/1958), 150–176.Google Scholar
  17. Lejewski, C.: ‘Parts of Speech’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, suppl. Vol. 39 (1965), 189–204.Google Scholar
  18. Lejewski, C.: ‘Leśniewski, Stanislaw’, in P. Edwards (ed.), The Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Macmillan, New York, 1967, Vol. 4, pp. 441–443.Google Scholar
  19. Lejewski, C.: ‘A System of Logic for Bicategorial Ontology’, Journal of Philosophical Logic 3 (1974), 265–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lejewski, C.: ‘Syntax and Semantics of Ordinary Language’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Soċiety, suppl. Vol. 44 (1975), pp. 127–146.Google Scholar
  21. Lejewski, C.: ‘Outline of an Ontology’, Bulletin of the John Rylands University Libary of Manchester 59 (1976), 127–147.Google Scholar
  22. Lejewski, C.: ‘Logic and Ontology’, in S. Koerner (ed.), Philosophy of Logic, Blackwell, Oxford, 1976, pp. 1–63.Google Scholar
  23. Lejewski, C.: ‘On the Damatic Stage in the Development of Kotar-Biński's Pansomatism’, in P. Weingartner and E. Morscher (eds.), Ontology and Logic, Duncker and Humblot, Berlin, 1979, pp. 197–214.Google Scholar
  24. Lejewski, C.: ‘Logic and Ontology’, in E. Agazzi (ed.), Modern Logic - A Survey, Synthese Library, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, 1980, pp. 379–398.Google Scholar
  25. Luschei, E. C. The Logical Systems of Leśniewski, Studies in Logic, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1962.Google Scholar
  26. Lycan, W. G.: ‘Semantic Competence and Funny Functors’, Monist 64 (1979), 209–222.Google Scholar
  27. Rickey, V. F.: ‘A Survey of Leśniewski's Logic’, Studia Logica 36 (1977), 407–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Simons, P. M.: ‘On Interpreting Leśniewski’, in History and Philosophy of Logic (to appear).Google Scholar
  29. Simons, P. M.: ‘Moments as Truth-makers’, in W. Leinfellner et al. (eds.), Language and Ontology, Proceedings of the 6th International Wittgensteins Symposium 1981, Hölder-Pichler-Tempsky, Vienna, 1982, pp. 159–161.Google Scholar
  30. Slupecki, J.: ‘S. Leśniewski's Calculus of Names’, Studia Logica 3 (1955), 7–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Smith, B.: ‘Some Formal Moments of Truth’, in W. Leinfellner et al. (eds.), Language and Ontology, Proceedings of the 6th International Wittgenstein Symposium 1981, Hölder-Pichler-Tempsky, Vienna, 1982, pp. 186–190.Google Scholar
  32. Tarski, A.: ‘The Concept of Truth in Formalized Languages’, in Tarski, A., Logic, Semantics, Metamathematics, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1956, pp. 152–278.Google Scholar
  33. Wittgenstein, L.: Tractatus Logico-philosophicus, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, 1963.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© D. Reidel Publishing Co. 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • Guido Küng
    • 1
  1. 1.University of FribourgSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations