Instructional Science

, Volume 15, Issue 1, pp 75–88 | Cite as

Students' in-class thinking

  • P. W. Marland
  • J. Edwards
Article

Abstract

In the last decade classroom researchers have begun to show interest in how students think during classroom instruction. The impetus for this shift in focus comes from a research paradigm which proposes that students' in-class thought processes mediate the effects of teaching processes on student learning and that studies of student thinking could therefore provide a key to a fuller understanding of how teaching processes influence student learning. Such studies have implications for teacher education and improving teaching.

This paper provides an account of a descriptive study of student thinking. It documents aspects of student thinking during regular lessons in a Grade Eleven Biology classroom and a Grade Ten Social Science classroom. Access to student thinking was obtained by using videotapes of lessons to stimulate recall of in-lesson thinking in post-lesson interviews. Analysis of students' self-report data provided insights into the nature of, and factors influencing, student thinking. It also called into question the value of some conventional wisdom about teaching and approaches to research.

Keywords

Teacher Education Student Learning Descriptive Study Full Understanding Classroom Instruction 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Becker, H.S., Geer, B. & Hughes, B.C. (1968) Making the Grade. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  2. Doyle, W. (1977) Paradigms for Research on Teacher Effectiveness. In L.S. Shulman (Ed.), Review of Research in Education, Vol. 5. Itasca, Ill: F.E. Peacock, 163–198.Google Scholar
  3. Doyle, W. (1979) Student Mediating Responses in Teacher Effectiveness. ERIC Microfiche ED187698.Google Scholar
  4. Edwards, J. & Baldauf, R.B.Jr. (1982). Teaching Thinking in Secondary Science. In Maxwell, W. (Ed.), Thinking: The Expanding Frontier. Philadelphia: Franklin Institute Press, 129–137.Google Scholar
  5. Edwards, J. & Marland, P. (1982). Student Thinking in a Secondary Biology Classroom. Paper presented to the Australian Science Education Research Association Conference, Macquarie University, Sydney.Google Scholar
  6. Elstein, A.S., Shulman, L.S. & Sprafka, S.A. (1978) Medical Problem Solving: An Analysis of Clinical Reasoning. London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Gil, D., Vinsonhaler, J.F. & Wagner, C.C. (1979) Studies of Clinical Problem Solving Behaviour in Reading Clinicians. (Research Series No. 43). East Lansing: Institute for Research on Teaching, Michigan State University.Google Scholar
  8. Kagan, N., Krathwohl, D.R., Goldberg, A.D. & Campbell, R. (1967) Studies in Human Interaction: Interpersonal Process Recall Stimulated by Videotape. East Lansing, Michigan: Michigan State University.Google Scholar
  9. Marland, P.W. (1979). A study of Teachers' Interactive Information Processing. In G. Rowley (Ed.), Proceedings of the A.A.R.E. Annual Conference. Melbourne: A.A.R.E., 42–61.Google Scholar
  10. Marland, P.W. & Caldwell, N.B.A. (1981) Instructional Planning: A Case Study. In Varley, P., Barlett, L. and Gillespie, R. (Eds.) Educational Research in the 1980's. Collected Papers, Vol. 2., Brisbane, Australian Association for Research in Education, pp. 396–402.Google Scholar
  11. McNair, K. & Joyce, B. (1979) Teachers' Thoughts While Teaching: The South Bay Study, Part II. (Research Series No. 58). East Lansing, Michigan: Institute for Research on Teaching, Michigan State University.Google Scholar
  12. Peterson, P.L. & Swing, S.R. (1982) Beyond Time On Task: Students' Reports of Their Thought Processes During Classroom Instruction, The Elementary School Journal, 42, 5: 481–491.Google Scholar
  13. Tobias, S. (1982) When Do Instructional Methods Make A Difference?, Educational Researcher, 11(4): 4–9.Google Scholar
  14. Winne, P.H. (1982) Cognitive Processing in the Classroom. Paper published by Instructional Psychology Research Group, Faculty of Education, Simon Fraser University.Google Scholar
  15. Winne, P.H. & Marx, R.W. (1982) Students' and Teachers' Views of Thinking Processes for Classroom Learning, The Elementary School Journal, 42, 5: 493–518.Google Scholar
  16. Winne, P.H. & Marx, R.W. (1983) Students' Cognitive Processes While Learning from Teaching: Summary of Findings, Occasional Paper No. 83–03, Instructional Psychology Research Group, Simon Fraser University, Canada.Google Scholar
  17. Yinger, R.J. (1980) A Study of Teacher Planning. The Elementary School Journal, 33, 134–139.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. W. Marland
    • 1
  • J. Edwards
    • 1
  1. 1.School of EducationJames Cook UniversityTownsvilleAustralia

Personalised recommendations