Topoi

, Volume 5, Issue 2, pp 101–113 | Cite as

Husserl and the representational theory of mind

  • Ronald McIntyre
Topos: Current Issues in Phenomenology

Abstract

Husserl has finally begun to be recognized as the precursor of current interest in intentionality — the first to have a general theory of the role of mental representations in the philosophy of language and mind. As the first thinker to put directedness of mental representations at the center of his philosophy, he is also beginning to emerge as the father of current research in cognitive psychology and artificial intelligence.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bach, Kent: 1982, ‘De re belief and methodological solipsism’, in Andrew Woodfield (ed.), Thought and Object: Essays on Intentionality, Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp. 121–151.Google Scholar
  2. Churchland, Paul M. and Patricia Smith Churchland: 1981, ‘Functionalism, qualia, and intentionality’, Philosophical Topics 12, 121–145.Google Scholar
  3. Cummins, Robert: 1983, The Nature of Psychological Explanation, MIT Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  4. Dretske, Fred: 1985, ‘Machines and the mental’, Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 59, 23–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dreyfus, Hubert L. (ed.): 1982, Husserl, Intentionality, and Cognitive Science, MIT Press/Bradford Books, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  6. Emmett, Kathleen: 1983, ‘Phenomenology and cognitive science: Should you be reading Husserl?’, Cognition and Brain Theory 6, 509–516.Google Scholar
  7. Fodor, J. A.: 1980, “Methodological solipsism considered as a research strategy in cognitive psychology”, The Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3, 63–73; reprinted in Dreyfus (1982), pp. 277–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fodor, J. A.: 1981, ‘The mind-body problem”, Scientific American 244, 114–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fodor, J. A.: 1984, ‘Mental representation: An introduction’, photocopy; colloquium presentation at the University of California, Irvine, 1984.Google Scholar
  10. Fodor, J. A.: 1985, ‘Fodor's guide to mental representation: The intelligent auntie's vade-mecum’, Mind 94, 76–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Husserl, Edmund: 1900, Logical Investigations, trans. by J. N. Findlay, Humanities Press, New York, 1970. [Original German edition, 1900–1901.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Husserl, Edmund: 1913, Ideen zu einer reinen Phänomenologie und phänomenologischen Philosophie, Drittes Buch; 1950 edition (Husserliana V), ed. Marly Biemal, Nijhoff, The Hague. [Original German edition, 1913. English trans. by F. Kersten, Nijhoff, The Hague, 1982.]Google Scholar
  13. Husserl, Edmund: 1925, Phenomenological Psychology, trans. by John Scanlon, Nijhoff, The Hague, 1962. [Lectures delivered by Husserl in 1925.]Google Scholar
  14. Husserl, Edmund: 1929, Formal and Transcendental Logic, trans. by Dorion Cairns, Nijhoff, The Hague, 1969. [Original German edition, 1929.]Google Scholar
  15. Husserl, Edmund: 1931, Cartesian Meditations, trans. by Dorion Carins, Nijhoff, The Hague, 1960. [Original edition, in French, 1931.]Google Scholar
  16. Husserl, Edmund: 1954, The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology, trans. by David Carr, North-western University Press, Evanston, Ill., 1970. [Original German edition, 1954, posthumus.]Google Scholar
  17. McGinn, Colin: 1982, ‘The structure of content’, in Andrew Woodfield (ed.), Thought and Object: Essays on Intentionality, Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp. 207–258.Google Scholar
  18. McIntyre, Ronald: 1984, ‘Searle on intentionality’, Inquiry 27, 468–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Putnam, Hilary: 1975, ‘The meaning of meaning’, in his Philosophical Papers, Vol II: Mind, Language and Reality, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 215–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Searle, John R.: 1983, Intentionality: An Essay in The Philosophy of Mind, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  21. Searle, John R.: 1984, ‘Intentionality and its place in nature’, Synthese 61, 3–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Smith, David Woodruff: 1984, ‘Content and context of perception’, Synthese 61, 61–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Smith, David Woodruff and McIntyre, Ronald: 1982, Husserl and Intentionality: A Study of Mind, Meaning, and Language, Reidel, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  24. Stich, Stephen: 1983, From Folk Psychology to Cognitive Science: The Case Against Belief, MIT Press/Bradford Books, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© D. Reidel Publishing Company 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ronald McIntyre
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyCalifornia State University, NorthridgeNorthridgeUSA

Personalised recommendations