Advertisement

Agroforestry Systems

, Volume 12, Issue 3, pp 269–284 | Cite as

Dynamics of swidden agriculture in East Kalimantan

  • Makoto Inoue
  • Abubakar M. Lahjie
Article

Abstract

The Kenyah Dayak people began to migrate from the isolated area to the Mahakam basin in the early 1950's. As the Kenyah people migrate downstream, infiltration of monetary economy into the village increases, which leads to changes of life style, social structure such as work organization and mutual aid system in daily life, and so on. In the course of a series of such changes, sustainable swidden agriculture system is also changed to a less sustainable one. The Benuaq Dayak people, however, practice sustainable ‘swidden (paddy) — rattan forestry’ system while they can earn much income. The Buginese way of land utilization, ‘swidden (paddy) — pepper production’ system, is the least sustainable though the pepper production is the most profitable in the region. The land utilization by the transmigrated Javanese is not so sustainable at present, but there is a possibility of its getting more sustainable because of acquisition of the land ownership.

Key words

Migration infiltration of monetary economy effect on environment swidden system East Kalimantan 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Boserup E (1965) The conditions of agricultural growth. London. George Allen & UnwinGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Colfer CJP (1983) Change and indigenous agroforestry in East Kalimantan. Borneo Research Bulletin Vol 15(1): 3–21, Vol 15(2): 69–87Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dove MR (1983) Theories of swidden agriculture, and the political economy of ignorance. Agroforestry systems 1: 85–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hadi S, Hadi S and Hidayat R (1985) Swidden cultivation in East Kalimantan. In: Swidden cultivation in Asia, pp 74–149 (Chapter two: Indonesia). Bangkok/Thailand. UNESCO regional office for education in Asia and PacificGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jessup TC (1981) Why do Apo Kayan shifting cultivators move? Borneo research bulletin Vol 13(1): 16–32Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kartawinata K and Vayda AP (1984) Forest conversion in East Kalimantan, Indonesia — The activities and impact of timber companies, shifting cultivators, migrant pepper farmers, and others. In: Ecology in practice — Part I, pp 98–126 (Chapter 7). UNESCOGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kartawinata K, Soedjito H, Jessup T, Vayda AP and Colfer CJP (1984) The impact of development on interactions between people and forests in East Kalimantan — A comparison of two areas of Kenyah Dayak settlement. The environmentalist Vol 4, Supplement No 7: 87–95Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Vayda AP, Colfer CJP and Brotokusumo M (1980) Interactions between people and forests in East Kalimantan. Impact of science on society Vol 30(3)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Vayda AP (1981) Research in East Kalimantan on interactions between people and forests — A preliminary report. Borneo research bulletin Vol 13(1): 3–15Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Vayda AP et al. (1985) Final report — shifting cultivation and patch dynamics in an upland forest in East Kalimantan, Indonesia. A joint project of the United States and Indonesian Man and the Biosphere (MAB) programs. Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USAGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Weinstock JA (1983) Rattan — ecological balance in a Borneo rainforest swidden. Economic botany Vol 37(1): 58–68Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Weinstock JA (1984) Rattan — a complement to swidden agriculture. Unasylva No 143: 16–22Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Makoto Inoue
    • 1
  • Abubakar M. Lahjie
    • 2
  1. 1.Forest Management DivisionForestry & Forest Products Research Institute (FFPRI)IbarakiJapan
  2. 2.Faculty of ForestryMulawarman UniversitySamarinda, East KalimantanIndonesia

Personalised recommendations