Advertisement

Transport in Porous Media

, Volume 6, Issue 1, pp 91–99 | Cite as

Richards' assumptions and Hassler's presumptions

  • Walter Rose
Short Communication

Abstract

Investigation suggests that certain assumptions must be implicitly made whenever the wellknown and much admired Richards-Hassler methodology (for investigating flow phenomena in multiphase saturated porous media) is being employed. Whenever the propositions that are being taken for granted are not fully stated, however, they can take on the appearance of being presumptions. The analysis presented in this essay, therefore, is intended to clarify the differences between what historically has been said, and what still needs to be said, about the rationale that underlies the sense of the always intriguing but sometimes misunderstood Richards-Hasslet conceptualizations.

Key words

Multiphase flow measurement methodologies relative permeability coupled transport processes 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Buckingham, E., 1907, Studies on the movement of soil moisture,USDA Bureau of Soils Bull. 38 USDA (Washington, DC).Google Scholar
  2. Gardner, W. R., 1972, The impact of L. A. Richards upon the field of soil water physics,Soil Sci. 113, 232.Google Scholar
  3. Hassler, G. L., 1944, Method and apparatus of permeability measurements, U.S. Letters Patent No. 2,345,935 (issued 4/04/44).Google Scholar
  4. Heslot, F., Fraysee, N., and Cazabat, A. M., 1989, Molecular layering in the spreading of wetting liquid drops,Nature 338, 640 (see also critique by P. Ball, 1989, Molecular layering in the spreading of wetting liquid drops,Nature 338, pp. 624–25).Google Scholar
  5. Philip, J. R., 1974, Fifty years progress in soil physics,Geoderma 12, 265Google Scholar
  6. Richards, L.A., 1931, Capillary conduction of liquids through porous mediums,Physics 1, 318.Google Scholar
  7. Rose, W., 1951, Some problems of relative permeability measurement,Proc. Third World Petrol. Congr., II, p.p. 446.Google Scholar
  8. Rose, W., 1961, Fluid-fluid interfaces in steady motion,Nature 191, 242.Google Scholar
  9. Rose, W., 1980, Some problems in applying the Hassler relative permeability method.J. Petrol. Technol. (June), 1161.Google Scholar
  10. Rose, W., 1987, Relative Permeability, in H. Bradley, (ed.)Petroleum Engineering Handbook, 2nd edn., Society of Petroleum Engineers, Dallas, Chap. 28.Google Scholar
  11. Rose, W., 1988, Measuring transport coefficients necessary for the description of coupled two-phase flow of immiscible fluids in porous media.Transport in Porous Media 3, 163.Google Scholar
  12. Rose, W. and Heins, R. W., 1962, Moving interfaces and contact angle rate-dependency,J. Colloid Sci. 17, 39.Google Scholar
  13. Scheidegger, A. E., 1974,The Physics of Flow Through Porous Media, 3rd edn, University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  14. Wooding, R. A. and Morel-Seytoux, H. J., 1976, Multiphase fluid flow through porous media,Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 8, 233.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Walter Rose
    • 1
  1. 1.CSIRO Centre for Environmental MechanicsCanberraAustralia

Personalised recommendations