Journal of Electronic Testing

, Volume 2, Issue 1, pp 77–88 | Cite as

Boundary scan test, test methodology, and fault modeling

  • Frans De Jong
  • José S. Matos
  • José M. Ferreira


The test technique called “boundary scan test” (BST) offers new opportunities in testing but confronts users with new problems too. The implementation of BST in a chip has become an IEEE standard and users on board level are the next group to begin thinking about using the new possibilities. This article addresses some of the questions about changes in board-level testing and fault diagnosis. The fault model itself is also affected by using BST. Trivial items are extended with more sophisticated details in order to complete the fault model. Finally, BST appears to be a test technique that offers a high degree of detectability on board level, but for diagnosis, some additional effort has to be made.

Key words

boundary scan test BST-net diagnosis fault modeling PCB testing test-pattern generation 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    JTAG, Final Version 2.0 of the standard Boundary Scan Architecture, April 1988.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    F. Beenker, K. Eerdewijk, R. Gerritsen, F. Peacock, and M. Star, “Macro testing: Unifying IC and board test,” IEEE Design and Test, December 1986, pp. 26–32.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    R. van Riessen, H. Kerkhoff, and A. Kloppenburg, “Design and implementation of a hierarchical testable architecture using the boundary scan standard,” Proc. 1st European Test Conf., 1989, pp. 112–118.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    L. Wang, M. Marhoefer, and E. McCluskey, “A self-test and self-diagnosis architecture for boards using boundary scan,” Proc. 1st European Test Conf., 1989, pp. 119–126.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Factron-Schlumberger, “The primer of high-performance incircuit testing,” 1985.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    P. Wagner, “Interconnect testing with boundary scan,” Proc. 18th Inter. Test. Conf., 1987, pp. 52–57.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    A. Hassan, J. Rajski, and V. Agarwal, “Testing and diagnosis of interconnects using boundary scan architecture,” Proc. 19th Inter. Test Conf., 1988, pp. 126–137.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    W. Kautz, “Testing of faults in wiring networks,” IEEE Trans. Comput., C-23(4): 358–363, April 1974.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    J. Hayes, “Fault Modeling,” IEEE Design and Test, April 1985, pp. 88–95.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Texas Instruments, “A primer on testability—test and emulation,” 1989.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    R. Bennetts, “Introduction to digital board testing,” Crane Russak & Company, Inc., 1982 (ISBN 0-8449-1385-0).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    H. Fujiwara, “On the acceleration of test generation algorithms,” IEEE Trans. Comput., C-32(12): 1137–1144, 1983.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    T. Kirkland, and M. Mercer, “Algorithms for automatic test pattern generation,” IEEE Design and Test, June 1988, pp. 43–55.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    S. Vining, “Tradeoff decisions made for a P1149.1 controller design,” Proc. 20th Inter. Test Conf., 1989, pp. 47–54.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    F. Francese, “Il collaudo di circuiti su piastra stampata,” Alta Frequenza, 57(6): 177–187, 1988.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    F. de Jong, “Test pattern generation for boards with partial Boundary Scan Test.” (Paper under preparation.)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    P. Goel and M.T. McMahon, “Electronic chip-in-place test,” Proc. 13th Inter. Test Conf., 1982, pp. 83–90.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    IEEE/P1149.1 Working Group, IEEE Std. 1149.1-1990 Standard Test Access Port and Boundary-Scan Architecture, February 1990.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Frans De Jong
    • 1
  • José S. Matos
    • 2
  • José M. Ferreira
    • 2
  1. 1.Philips, CFT-AutomationMDThe Netherlands
  2. 2.INESCPortugal

Personalised recommendations