Flexural and fatigue properties of a bone cement based upon polyethylmethacrylate and hydroxyapatite

  • E. J. Harper
  • J. C. Behiri
  • W. Bonfield
Article

Polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) bone cement is commonly used in surgery to fix joint replacements into the bone. Although the operations are generally successful, loosening of the prosthesis does occur with fracture of the bone cement treated as the source of failure in some instances. Polyethylmethacrylate (PEMA) bone cement offers a promising alternative to PMMA due to its high ductility, low toxicity and low exotherm. In addition, hydroxyapatite (HA) particles can be added, while retaining the ductile properties of the material. In this study, the flexural and fatigue properties of this experimental cement, with and without HA reinforcement, have been examined. It was found that up to 40wt.% HA could be added with increases in both flexural strength and modulus. Specimens were subjected to tensiontension cyclic loading at a number of stress levels until catastrophic failure occurred. In comparison with a commercial PMMA cement, tested at relatively high stresses, the PEMA cement failed at lower cycles to failure. However, the data converged at the lower stresses employed which are closer to the physiological loading situation. With the addition of HA, although the cycles to failure were decreased, the deformation experienced by the PEMA-HA cement whilst being cycled was reduced.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    T. A. GRUEN, G. M. MCNEICE and H. C. AMSTUTZ, Clin. Orthop. Rel. Res. 141 (1979) 17–27.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    R. P. KUSY J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 12 (1978) 271–305.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    H. C. AMSTUTZ and T. A. GRUEN, in “Current practice in orthopaedic surger,” edited by J. P. Ahstrom (The CV Mosby Company, St. Louis, 1973), pp. 158–182.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    R. M. PILLIAR, R. BLACKWELL, R. MACNAB and R. CAMERON, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 10 (1976) 893–906.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    S. SAHA and S. PAL, J. Biomechanics 17 (1984) 467–478.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    T. M. WRIGHT and P. S. TRENT, J. Mater. Sci. 14 (1979) 503–505.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    J. PEREK and R. M. PILLIAR, J. Mater. Sci. 3 (1992) 333–344.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    A. SOGAL and S. F. HULBERT, Bioceramics 5 (1992) 213–224.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    A. CASTALDINI and A. CAVALLINI, “Biological and Biomedical Performance of Biomaterials,” edited by P. Christel, A. Meunier and A. J. C. Lee. (Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam 1986) pp. 525–530.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    A. S. LITSKY, R. M. ROSE, C. T. RUBIN and E. L. THRASHER, J. Orthop. Res. 8 (1990) 623–626.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    B. WEIGHTMAN, M. A. R. FREEMAN, P. A. REVELL, M. BRADEN, B. E. J. ALBREKTSSON and L. V. CARLSON, J. Bone Joint Surg. 69-B (1987) 558–564.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    K. W. M. DAVY and M. BRADEN, Biomaterials 12 (1991) 540–544.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    P. REVELL, M. GEORGE, M. BRADEN, M. FREEMAN and B. WEIGHTMAN, Biomaterials 3 (1992) 84–87.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    P. REVELL, M. BRADEN, B. WEIGHTMAN and M. A. R. FREEMAN, Clin. Mater. 10 (1992) 233–238.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    J. BEHIRI, M. BRADEN, S. N. KHORISANI, D. WIWATTANDATE and W. BONFIELD, Bioceramics 4 (1991) 301–304.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    S. KHORASANI, S. DEB, J. BEHIRI, M. BRADEN and W. BONFIELD, Bioceramics 5 (1992) 225–232.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    ASTM F451-86 American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, PA (1986).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    ISO 178: 1993(E), International Organization for Standardization, Switzerland (1993).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    BS 2782: Part 9: Method 931A British Standards Institution, London, UK, (1988).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    R. D. CROWNINSHIELD, R. A. BRAND, R. C. JOHNSTON and J. C. MILROY, J. Bone Joint Surg. 62-A (1980) 68–78.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    R. D. CROWNINSHIELD, R. A. BRAND, R. C. JOHNSTON and J. C. MILROY, Clin. Orthop. Rel. Res. 146 (1980) 71–77.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    J. P. DAVIES, D. O. O'CONNER, D. W. BURKE, M. JASTY and W. D. HARRIS, Clin. Orthop. 229 (1988) 156–161.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    L. D. T. TOPOLESKI, P. DUCHEYNE and J. M. CUCKLER, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 24 (1990) 135–154.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Chapman & Hall 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • E. J. Harper
    • 1
  • J. C. Behiri
    • 1
  • W. Bonfield
    • 1
  1. 1.IRC in Biomedical Materials, Queen Mary and Westfield CollegeUniversity of LondonLondonUnited Kingdom

Personalised recommendations