Advertisement

Cooperation and cooperator modeling

  • Beatrice Cahour
  • Pascal Salembier
Article

Abstract

In this text, we argue that user modeling and system modeling should be taken into account at the same time to allow cooperativity: they are two sides of a same interaction. We focus on interlocutor modeling (the human-human homonym of user modeling) and develop three situations where interlocutor modeling is crucial: when there is a need of transforming the beliefs of the cooperator (when there is a knowledge gap or a resistance), when the interpretation of the cooperator's communication act is ambiguous and relies on implicit meaning, and when there is a specific need need of anticipating the other's understanding (in risky or irreversible situations).

Key words

Cooperation at work interaction user modeling system model mutual understanding 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alty, J., P Elzer, O. Holst, G. Johannsen, and S. Savory (1985): Literature and User Survey of Issues Related to Man-Machine Interfaces for Supervision and Control System. Esprit P600 Graphical Dialogue Pilot Phase Report.Google Scholar
  2. Andre, E., R. Cohen, G. Winfried, B. Kass, C. Paris, and W. Wahlster (1992): Proceeding of the Third International Workshop on User Modeling, Dagstuhl Castle, Germany, 10–13 August, 1992.Google Scholar
  3. Benchekroun, T.H., B. Pavard, and P. Salembier (1994): Design of Cooperative Systems in Complex Dynamic Environments. In Expertise and Technology — Cognition & Human-Computer Cooperation, J.M. Hoc, P.C. Cacciabue, and E. Hollnagel (eds.). London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bratman, M. (1990): Joint Interaction and Jointly Intentional Action. Acres du Colloque Convention, CREA Ecole Polytechnique, Paris, March 1990.Google Scholar
  5. Burger, M.L. and J.F. DeSoi (1992): The Cognitive Apprenticeship Analogue: A Strategy for Using ITS Technology for the Delivery of Instruction and as a Research Tool for the Study of Teaching and Learning. Int. J. of Man-Machine Studies, vol. 36, pp. 775–795.Google Scholar
  6. Cahour, B. (1991): La modélisation de l'interlocuteur: élaboration du modèle et effets au cours des dialogues de consultation. Thèse de Doctorat, Université Paris VIII.Google Scholar
  7. Cahour, B. (1992): How Do Experts Categorize the Interlocutor during Consultation Dialogs?Proceedings of the User Modeling-92 International Workshop, Dagstuhl Castle, Germany, August 10–13,1992.Google Scholar
  8. Cahour, B. and P. Falzon (1991): Assistance à l'opérateur et modelisation de sa compétence. Intellectica, vol. 12, pp. 159–186.Google Scholar
  9. Cahour, B. and L. Karsenty (1993): Context of Dialogue: A Cognitive Point of View. Proceedings of the IJCAI'93 Workshop on “Using Knowledge in Its Context”, Chambery, France, August 29, 1993.Google Scholar
  10. Cahour, B. and C. Paris (1991): Role and Use of User Models. Proceedings of the International IJCAI'91 Workshop on “Agent Modeling”, Sydney, Australia, August 1991.Google Scholar
  11. Chin, D.N. (1986): User Modelling in UC, the UNIX Consultant. In Human Factors in Computing Systems — III, M. Mantei and P. Orbeton (eds.). Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
  12. Clark, H.H. and S.E. Brennan (1991): Grounding in Conversation. In Perpective on Socially Shared Cognition, L.B. Resnick, J.M. Levine, and S.D. Teasley (eds.). Washington D.C.: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  13. Clark, H.H. and E.F. Schaefer (1989): Contributing to Discourse. Cognitive Science, vol. 13, pp. 259–294.Google Scholar
  14. Clarke, A.A. and Smyth, M.G.G. (1993): A Cooperative Computer Based on the Principles of Human Cooperation. Int. J. of Man-Machine Studies, vol. 38, pp. 3–22.Google Scholar
  15. Decortis, F. and B. Pavard (1994): Communication et cooperation: de la théorie des acres de langage à l'approche ethnométhodologique. In Systèmes coopératifs: de la modélisation à la conception, B. Pavard (ed.). Toulouse: Octares.Google Scholar
  16. Falzon, P. (1989): Assister l'activité, Acres de la 9ème Conference Internationale sur les Systèmes experts et leurs Applications, Avignon, France, 29 May to 2 June, 1989.Google Scholar
  17. Fischer, G. (1991): The Importance of Models in Making Complex Systems Comprehensible. In Mental Models and Human-Computer Interaction 2, M.J. Tauber and D. Ackermann (eds.), Amsterdam: North-Holland, Elsevier.Google Scholar
  18. Goffman, E. (1974): Les rites d'interaction. Paris: Editions de Minuit.Google Scholar
  19. Grice, H.P. (1975): Logic and Conversation. In Syntax and Semantics, P. Cole and J.L. Morgan (eds.). New York: Academic PressGoogle Scholar
  20. Gutknecht, M., R. Pfeifer, and M. Stolze (1991): Cooperative Hybrid Systems, Proceedings of IJCAI-91 Conference, Sydney, Australia, 24–30 August 1991.Google Scholar
  21. Kobsa, A. and W. Wahlster (1989): User Models in Dialog Systems. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  22. Luminet, J.P. (1987): Les trous noirs. Paris: Belfond.Google Scholar
  23. McCoy, K.F. (1989/90): Generating Context-Sensitive Responses to Object-Related Misconceptions. Artificial Intelligence, vol. 41, pp. 157–195.Google Scholar
  24. Moore, J.D. and C. Paris (1992): Exploiting User Feedback to Compensate for the Unreliability of User Models. User-Modeling and User Adapted Interaction, vol. 2, pp. 287–330.Google Scholar
  25. Moore, J.D. and W.R. Swartout (1990): A Reactive Approach to Explanation: Taking the User's Feedback into Account. In Natural Language Generation in Artificial Intelligence and Computational Linguistics, C.L. Paris, W.R. Swartout, and W.C. Mann (eds.). Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  26. Quilici, A. (1994): Forming User Models by Understanding User Feedback. User-Modeling and User Adapted Interaction, vol. 3, pp. 321–358.Google Scholar
  27. Rich, E. (1979): User Modeling via Stereotypes. Cognitive Science, vol. 3, pp. 329–354.Google Scholar
  28. Rich, E. (1989): Stereotypes and User Modelling. In User Models in Dialog Systems, A. Kobsa and W. Wahlster (eds.). Berlin: Springer-Verlag, pp. 35–51.Google Scholar
  29. Salembier, P. (1992): Etude empirique et modelisation d'une activité de diagnostic cognitif. Intellectica, vol. 15.Google Scholar
  30. Salembier, P. (1993): Le diagnostic cognitif dans les interactions tutorielles: apports a la conception d'un système d'autoformation. These de Doctorat, CNAM, Paris.Google Scholar
  31. Salembier, P. (1994a): Assistance coopérative aux activités complexes: l'exemple de la régulation du trafic aérien. In Systèmes coopératifs: de la modélisation à la conception, B. Pavard (ed.). Toulouse: Octares.Google Scholar
  32. Salembier, P. (1994b): Cognition partagée: les études empiriques. Assises PRESCOT-COGNISCIENCES, Toulouse, 23–24 September, 1994.Google Scholar
  33. Searle, J. (1990): Collective intentions and actions, In Intentions in Communication, P.R. Cohen, J. Morgan, and M.E. Pollack (eds.). Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  34. Silverman, B.G. (1992): Human-Computer Collaboration. Human-Computer Interaction, vol. 7, pp. 165–196.Google Scholar
  35. Sperber, D. and J. Wilson (1986): Relevance. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  36. Stevens, A.L., A. Collins, and S. Goldin (1979): Misconceptions in Students' Understanding. Int. J. of Man-Machine Studies, vol. 11, pp. 145–156.Google Scholar
  37. Visetti, Y.M. (1986): Contribution à la modélisation de l'interlocuteur en Enseignement Assisté par Ordinateur. Thèse de Doctorat, Université Paris VI.Google Scholar
  38. Wenger, E. (1987): Artificial Intelligence and Tutoring Systems. Los Altos: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.Google Scholar
  39. Woods, D.D., E.M. Roth, and K. Bennett, (1987): Explorations in Joint Human-Machine Cognitive Systems. In Cognition, Computing and Cooperation, W. Zachary and S. Robertson (eds.). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
  40. Woods, D.D., S.S. Potter, L. Johannesen, and M. Holloway, (1991): Human Interaction with Intelligent Systems: Volume I — Trends, Problems, New Directions. CSEL Report 1991–001, Ohio State University, Columbus OH.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Beatrice Cahour
    • 1
  • Pascal Salembier
    • 2
  1. 1.SUDLA, URA CNRS 1164Université de Rouen/IREDMont St. Aignan CédexFrance
  2. 2.ARAMIIHS UMR 115Toulouse CédexFrance

Personalised recommendations