The sensitivity of bank stock returns to real estate

  • Ling T. He
  • F. C. Neil Myer
  • James R. Webb
Article
  • 131 Downloads

Abstract

According to the Federal Reserve Board, banking firms have recently been shifting significantly larger portions of their loan portfolios into real estate. This increase in real estate lending has caused concern about the continuing economic health of banks on the part of state and federal regulators, since changes in real estate returns, evidenced by changes in property value, can potentially have a significant impact on bank default risk and profit-ability. However, concerned parties do not seem to have explicitly considered the relationship between mortgage default risk and the specific characteristics of real estate investments.

This study examines the sensitivities of stock returns for different bank groups, based on the percentage of total loans in real estate and the percentage of loans in five different mortgage categories (construction and development loans, farmland loans, one- to four-family residential loans, multifamily residential loans, and nonresidential and nonfarm loans), to changes in real estate market returns. This is done by developing and using a three-index model.

The results of this study indicate that bank stocks, overall, are very sensitive to changes in real estae returns. Banks, with a larger portion of their total loans invested in all types of real estate loans, except farmland loans, are most sensitive to changes in real estate returns.

Key Words

bank holding company sensitivity to real estate three-index model types of real estate loans 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson, D.R., and M. Weinrobe. (1986). “Mortgage Default Risks and the 1971 San Fernando Earthquake,” AREUEA Journal 14, 110–135.Google Scholar
  2. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. (1980). “The Depository Institutions Deregulation and Monetary Control Act of 1980,” Federal Reserve Bulletin (June), 444–453.Google Scholar
  3. Booth, J.R., and D.T. Officer. (1985). “Expectations, Interest Rates, and Commercial Bank Stocks,” Journal of Financial Research 8, 51–58.Google Scholar
  4. Campbell, T.S., and J.K. Dietrich. (1983). “The Determinants of Default of insured Conventional Residential Mortgage Loans,” Journal of Finance 18, 1569–1581.Google Scholar
  5. Chance, D.M., and W.R. Lane. (1980). “A Re-Examination of Interest Rate Sensitivity in the Common Stocks of Financial Institutions,” Journal of Financial Research 3, 49–55.Google Scholar
  6. Flanners, M.J., and C.M. James. (1984a). “The Effect of Interest Rate Changes of Common Stock Returns of Financial Institutions,” Journal of Finance 39, 1141–1153.Google Scholar
  7. Flannery, M.J., and C.M. James. (1984b). “Market Evidence on the Effective Maturity of Bank Assets and Liabilities,” Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking 16, 435–445.Google Scholar
  8. Furstenberg, G.M., and R.J. Green. (1974a). “Estimation of Delinquency Risk for Home Mortgage Portfolios,” AREUEA Journal 2, 375–384.Google Scholar
  9. Furstenberg, G.M., and R.J. Green. (1974b). “Home Mortgage Delinquencies: A Cohort Analysis,” Journal of Finance 24, 1545–1548.Google Scholar
  10. Hartzell, D.J., and J. Fernald. (1987). “A Recent Innovation: Creating High-Yielding Synthetic Commercial Mortgage-Backed Floating Rate Bonds Through Interest Rate Swaps,” Housing Finance Review 6, 73–77.Google Scholar
  11. Hill, E.W., and R.J. Vaughan. (1992). “The Impact of Commercial Real Estate on Bank Portfolios.” Appendix D in Banking on the Brink: The Troubled Future of American Finance. Washington, D.C.: Washington Post Briefing Books.Google Scholar
  12. Ibbotson Associates. (1992). Stocks, Bonds, Bills, and Inflation. Chicago.Google Scholar
  13. Kmenta, Jan. (1986). Elements of Econometrics. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  14. Kwan, S.H. (1991). “Re-Examination of Interest Rate Sensitivity of Commercial Bank Stock Returns Using a Random Coefficient Model,” Journal of Financial Services Research 5, 61–76.Google Scholar
  15. Lynge, M.J., and J.K. Zumwalt. (1980). “An Empirical Study of the Interest Rate Sensitivity of Commercial Bank Returns: A Multi-Index Approach,” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 15, 731–742.Google Scholar
  16. Mei, Jianping, and A. Saunders. (1991). “Bank Risk and Real Estate: An Asset Pricing Perspective,” Working paper, New York University.Google Scholar
  17. National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts, Inc. (1992). REIT SOURCEBOOK: A Complete Guide to the Modern Real Estate Investment Trust Industry. Washington.Google Scholar
  18. Quigley, J.M., and R.V. Order. (1990). “Efficiency in the Mortgage Markets: The Borrower's Perspective,” AREUEA Journal 18, 237–252.Google Scholar
  19. Scott, W.L., and R.L. Peterson. (1986). “Interest Rate Risk and Equity Values of Hedged and Unhedged Financial Intermediaries,” Journal of Financial Research 9, 325–329.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ling T. He
    • 1
  • F. C. Neil Myer
    • 2
  • James R. Webb
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Economics and FinanceCollege of Business and Economics, Christopher Newport University, Newport NewsNewportUSA
  2. 2.Department of FinanceJames J. Nance College of Business Administration, Cleveland State UniversityClevelandUSA
  3. 3.Department of FinanceJames J. Nance College of Business Administration, Cleveland State UniversityClevelandUSA

Personalised recommendations