Biology and Philosophy

, Volume 6, Issue 3, pp 303–324 | Cite as

Complexity and evolution: What everybody knows

  • Daniel W. McShea

Abstract

The consensus among evolutionists seems to be (and has been for at least a century) that the morphological complexity of organisms increases in evolution, although almost no empirical evidence for such a trend exists. Most studies of complexity have been theoretical, and the few empirical studies have not, with the exception of certain recent ones, been especially rigorous; reviews are presented of both the theoretical and empirical literature. The paucity of evidence raises the question of what sustains the consensus, and a number of suggestions are offered, including the possibility that certain cultural and/or perceptual biases are at work. In addition, a shift in emphasis from theoretical to empirical inquiry is recommended for the study of complexity, and guidelines for future empirical studies are proposed.

Key words

Complexity entropy evolution evolutionary trends Herbert Spencer progress 

References

  1. Atlan, H.: 1974, ‘On a Formal Definition of Organization’, Journal of Theoretical Biology 45, 295–304.Google Scholar
  2. Ayala, F.J.: 1974, ‘The Concept of Biological Progress’, in F.J. Ayala and T. Dobzhansky (eds.), Studies in the Philosophy of Biology, MacMillan Press Ltd., London, pp. 339–355.Google Scholar
  3. Bonner, J.T.: 1988, The Evolution of Complexity, Princeton University Press, Princeton.Google Scholar
  4. Brooks, D.R. and E.O. Wiley: 1988, Evolution as Entropy, 2nd edition, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  5. Castrodeza, C.: 1978, ‘Evolution, Complexity, and Fitness’, Journal of Theoretical Biology 71, 469–471.Google Scholar
  6. Cisne, J.L.: 1974, ‘Evolution of the World Fauna of Aquatic Free-Living Arthropods’, Evolution 28, 337–366.Google Scholar
  7. Cole, B.J.: 1985, ‘Size and Behavior in Ants: Constraints on Complexity’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 82, 8548–8551.Google Scholar
  8. Cope, E.D.: 1871, ‘The Method of Creation of Organic Forms’, Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 12, 229–263.Google Scholar
  9. Darwin, C.: 1859 (1964), On the Origin of Species (A facsimile of the first edition), Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  10. Darwin, C.: 1987, ‘Notebook E’, in P.H. Barett et al. (eds.), Charles Darwin's Notebooks, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
  11. Denbigh, K.G.: 1975, ‘A Non-Conserved Function for Organized Systems’, in L. Kubat and J. Zeman (eds.), Entropy and Information in Science and Philosophy, American Elsevier, New York, pp. 83–92.Google Scholar
  12. Fisher, D.C.: 1986, ‘Progress in Organismal Design’, in D.M. Raup and D. Jablonski (eds.), Patterns and Processes in the History of Life, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 99–117.Google Scholar
  13. Gatlin, L.L.: 1972, Information Theory and the Living System, Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  14. Goudge, T.A.: 1961, The Ascent of Life, George Allen and Unwin Ltd., London, p. 39.Google Scholar
  15. Gould, S.J.: 1977a, ‘Eternal Metaphors of Paleontology’, in A. Hallam (ed.), Patterns of Evolution, Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 1–26.Google Scholar
  16. Gould, S.J.: 1977b, Ontogeny and Phytogeny, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  17. Gould, S.J., N.L. Gilinsky, and R.Z. German: 1987, ‘Asymmetry of Lineages and the Direction of Evolutionary Time’, Science 236, 1437–1441.Google Scholar
  18. Gould, S.J.: 1988, ‘On Replacing the Idea of Progress with an Operational Notion of Directionality’, in N.H. Nitecki (ed.), Evolutionary Progress, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 319–338.Google Scholar
  19. Gregory, W.K.: 1934, ‘Polyisomerism and Anisomerism in Cranial and Dental Evolution Among Vertebrates’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 20, 1–9.Google Scholar
  20. Gregory, W.K.: 1935a, ‘Reduplication in Evolution’, Quarterly Review of Biology 10, 272–290.Google Scholar
  21. Gregory, W.K.: 1935b, ‘“Williston's Law” Relating to the Evolution of Skull Bones in the Vertebrates’, American Journal of Physical Anthropology 20, 123–152.Google Scholar
  22. Gregory, W.K.: 1951a, Evolution Emerging, Volume 1,The MacMillan Company, New York, pp. 548–549.Google Scholar
  23. Gregory, W.K.: 1951b, Evolution Emerging, Volume 2, The MacMillan Company, New York, p. 899.Google Scholar
  24. Hinegardner, R. and J. Engelberg: 1983, ‘Biological Complexity’, Journal of Theoretical Biology 104, 7–20.Google Scholar
  25. Hull, D.L.: 1988, ‘Progress in Ideas of Progress’, in M.H. Nitecki (ed.), Evolutionary Progress, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 27–48.Google Scholar
  26. Huxley, J.S.: 1953, Evolution in Action, Harper and Brothers, New York.Google Scholar
  27. Kampis, G. and V. Csányi: 1987, ‘Notes on Order and Complexity’, Journal of Theoretical Biology 124, 111–121.Google Scholar
  28. Katz, M.J.: 1987, ‘Is Evolution Random?’, in R.A. Raff and E.C. Raff (eds.), Development as an Evolutionary Process, Alan R. Liss, New York, pp. 285–315.Google Scholar
  29. Lamarck, J.B.P.A.M.: 1809 (1984), Zoological Philosophy, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  30. Landauer, R.: 1988, ‘A Simple Measure of Complexity’, Nature 336, 306–307.Google Scholar
  31. Lewontin, R.C.: 1968, ‘Evolution’, in D.L. Sills (ed.), International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, Volume 5, The MacMillan Company and The Free Press, pp. 202–210.Google Scholar
  32. Maddox, J.: 1990, ‘Complicated Measures of Complexity’, Nature 344, 705.Google Scholar
  33. Maynard Smith, J.: 1970, ‘Time in the Evolutionary Process’, Studium Generale 23, 266–272.Google Scholar
  34. Maynard Smith, J.: 1988, ‘Evolutionary Progress and Levels of Selection’, in M.H. Nitecki (ed.), Evolutionary Progress, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 219–230.Google Scholar
  35. Maze, J. and R.K. Scagel: 1983, ‘A Different View of Plant Morphology and the Evolution of Form’, Systematic Botany 8, 469–472.Google Scholar
  36. McCoy, J.W.: 1977, ‘Complexity in Organic Evolution’, Journal of Theoretical Biology 68, 457–458.Google Scholar
  37. Needham, J.: 1936, Order and Life, Yale University Press, New Haven.Google Scholar
  38. Owen, R.: 1866, Anatomy of Vertebrates, Volume 2, Longmans, Green, and Co., London.Google Scholar
  39. Papentin, F.: 1980, ‘On Order and Complexity. I. General Considerations’, Journal of Theoretical Biology 87, 421–456.Google Scholar
  40. Papentin, F.: 1982, ‘On Order and Complexity. II. Applications to Chemical and Biochemical Structures’, Journal of Theoretical Biology 95, 225–245.Google Scholar
  41. Prigogine, I., G. Nicolis, and A. Babloyantz: 1972, ‘Thermodynamics of Evolution’, Physics Today, December, pp. 38–44.Google Scholar
  42. Raup, D.M.: 1977, ‘Stochastic Models in Evolutionary Palaentology’, in A. Hallam (ed.), Patterns of Evolution, Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 59–78.Google Scholar
  43. Rensch, B.: 1960, Evolution above the Species Level, Columbia University Press, New York, pp. 281–308.Google Scholar
  44. Richardson, R.C. and T.C. Kane: 1988, ‘Orthogenesis and Evolution in the Nineteenth Century’, in M.H. Nitecki (ed.), Evolutionary Progress, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 149–168.Google Scholar
  45. Robson, K.A., R.K. Scagel, and J. Maze: 1988, ‘Sources of Morphological Variation and Organization Within and Among Populations of Balsamorhiza sagittata’, Canadian Journal of Botany 66, 11–17.Google Scholar
  46. Ruse, M.: 1988, ‘Molecules to Men: Evolutionary Biology and Thoughts of Progress’, in M.H. Nitecki (ed.), Evolutionary Progress, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 97–126.Google Scholar
  47. Salthe, S.N.: 1985, Evolving Hierarchical Systems, Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  48. Saunders, P.T. and M.-W. Ho: 1976, ‘On the Increase in Complexity in Evolution’, Journal of Theoretical Biology 63, 375–384.Google Scholar
  49. Saunders, P.T. and M.-W. Ho: 1981, ‘On the Increase in Complexity in Evolution II. The Relativity of Complexity and the Principle of Minimum Increase’, Journal of Theoretical Biology 90, 515–530.Google Scholar
  50. Schopf, T.J.M., D.M. Raup, S.J. Gould, and D.S. Simberloff: 1975, ‘Genomic Versus Morphologic Rates of Evolution: Influence of Morphologic Complexity’, Paleobiology 1, 63–70.Google Scholar
  51. Simpson, G.G.: 1949, The Meaning of Evolution, Yale University Press, New Haven.Google Scholar
  52. Simpson, G.G.: 1961, Principles of Animal Taxonomy, Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  53. Spencer, H.: 1890, First Principles, 5th edition, Williams and Norgate, London.Google Scholar
  54. Spencer, H.: 1893, The Principles of Biology, Volume 2, D. Appleton and Company, New York.Google Scholar
  55. Stanley, S.M.: 1973, ‘An Explanation for Cope's Rule’, Evolution 27, 1–26.Google Scholar
  56. Stebbins, G.L.: 1969, The Basis of Progressive Evolution, University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill.Google Scholar
  57. Subba Rao, J., C.P. Geevan, and G. Subba Rao: 1982, ‘Significance of the Information Content of DNA in Mutations and Evolution’, Journal of Theoretical Biology 96, 571–577.Google Scholar
  58. Swetlitz, M.: 1989, ‘Facts, Values, and Progress: Julian Huxley's Use of the Fossil Record’, A talk presented before the Society for the History, Philosophy and Social Studies of Biology, University of Western Ontario, 25 June 1989. (Copies are available from the author at the following address: History Department, University of Chicago, 1126 E. 59th Street, Chicago, IL 60637 USA.)Google Scholar
  59. Vogt, P.R. and J.C. Holden: 1979, ‘The End-Cretaceous Extinctions: A Study of the Multiple Working Hypotheses Method Gone Mad’, in W.K. Christensen and T. Birkelund (eds.), Cretaceous/Tertiary Boundary Events Symposium Proceedings, Volume 2, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, p. 49.Google Scholar
  60. Waddington, C.H.: 1969, ‘Paradigm for an Evolutionary Process’, in C.H. Waddington (ed.), Towards a Theoretical Biology, Volume 2, Aldine Publishing Company, Chicago, pp. 106–128.Google Scholar
  61. Wake, D.B., E.F. Connor, A.J. de Ricqlès, J. Dzik, D.C. Fisher, S.J. Gould, M. LaBarbera, D.A. Meeter, V. Mosbrugger, W.-E. Reif, R.M. Rieger, A. Seilacher, and G.P. Wagner: 1986, ‘Directions in the History of Life’, in D.M. Raup and D. Jablonski (eds.), Patterns and Processes in the History of Life, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 47–67.Google Scholar
  62. Wicken, J.S.: 1979, ‘The Generation of Complexity in Evolution: A Thermodynamic and Information-Theoretical Discussion’, Journal of Theoretical Biology 77, 349–365.Google Scholar
  63. Wicken, J.S.: 1987, Evolution, Thermodynamics, and Information, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  64. Williams, G.C.: 1966, Adaptation and Natural Selection, Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp. 42–55.Google Scholar
  65. Wright, R.: 1990, ‘The Intelligence Test’, The New Republic, 29 January, pp. 29–36.Google Scholar
  66. Yagil, G.: 1985, ‘On the Structural Complexity of Simple Biosystems’, Journal of Theoretical Biology 112, 1–23.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Daniel W. McShea
    • 1
  1. 1.Committee on Evolutionary BiologyUniversity of ChicagoChicagoU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations