Advertisement

International Ophthalmology

, Volume 19, Issue 6, pp 323–329 | Cite as

Vitrectomy for macular detachment associated with optic nerve pits

  • Karl Ulrich Bartz-Schmidt
  • Klaus Heimann
  • Peter Esser
Article

Abstract

Objective. To describe the pathogenic mechanism for a central retinal detachment in eyes with a pit of the optic disc. Design. Three patients with macular detachment associated with optic nerve head pits were prospectively controlled following pars plana vitrectomy. Methods. Three cases of macular detachment associated with congenital optic nerve pit were treated with pars plana vitrectomy and air-fluid exchange and sulphur hexafloride (SF6) gas injection. During vitrectomy posterior hyaloid removal caused visible traction on the elevated retina, when the hyaloid detached. Removing the posterior hyaloid resulted in reattachment of the macular and an increase in the visual acuity without laser treatment. Conclusion. We recommend the removal of the posterior hyaloid face during pars plana vitrectomy in patients with central macular detachment associated with a pit of the optic disc.

Key words

optic nerve head pit macular detachment posterior hyaloid removal 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Peterson, HP. Pits or crater-like holes in the optic disc. Acta Ophthalmol 1958; 36: 435–43.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kranenburg, EW. Crater-like holes in the optic disc and central serous retinopathy. Arch Ophthalmol 1960; 64: 912–24.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Brown, GC, Shields, LA, Goldberg, RE. Congenital pits of the optic nerve head. II. Clinical studies in humans. Ophthalmology 1980; 87: 51–65.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sugar, HS. Congenital pits in the optic disc with acquired macular pathology. Am J Ophthalmol 1962; 53: 307–11.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gass, JDM. Serous detachment of the macula. Secondary to congenital pit of the optic nerve head. Am J Ophthalmol 1969; 67: 821–41.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lin, CCL, Tso, MOM, Vygantas, CM. Coloboma of the optic nerve associated with serous maculopathy: A clinicopathological study. Arch Ophthalmol 1984; 102: 1651–4.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cox, MS, Witherspoon, D, Morris, RE, Flynn, HW. Evolving techniques in the treatment of macular detachment caused by optic nerve pits. Ophthalmology 1988; 95: 889–96.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Schatz, H, McDonald, R. Treatment of sensory retinal detachment associated with optic nerve pit or coloboma. Ophthalmology 1988; 95: 178–86.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Regenbogen, L, Stein, R, Lazar, M. Macular and juxtapapillar seroud retinal detachment associated with pit of optic disc. Ophthalmologica 1964; 148: 247–51.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Goldberg, RE. Optic nerve pit and associated coloboma with serous detachment. Arch Ophthalmol 1974; 91: 160–1.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mizuno, K, Ozwaza, K. Central flat detachment and pseudohole with optic pit treated with diathermy. Nippon Gonka Kiyo 1970; 21: 378–83.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Vogel, MH, Wessing, A. Makulaveränderungen bei Grubenpapille. Klin Mbl Augenheilk 1974; 164: 90–7.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mustonen, E, Varonen, T. Congenital pit of the optic nerve headn associated with serous detachment of the macula. Acta Ophthalmol 1972; 50: 689–98.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Tillmann, W, Antoniadis, A. Periphere Netzhautablösung bei Grubenpapille. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilk 1973; 162: 234–7.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Brockhurst, R. Optic pits and posterior retinal detachment. Tr Am Ophth Soc 1975; 73: 264–91.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kottow, M. Photocoagulation of optic pits. Ophthalmologica 1982; 184: 26–9.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Theodossiadis, G. Evolution of congenital pit of the optic disk with macular detachment in photocoagulated and nonphotocoagulated eyes. Am J Ophthalmol 1977; 84: 620–31.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Annesley, W, Brown, GC, Bolling, J, Goldberg, RE, Fischer, D. Treatment of retinal detachment with congenital optic pit by krypton laser photocoagulation. Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 1987; 225: 311–4.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bonnet, M. Serous macular detachment associated with optic nerve pits. Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 1991; 229: 526–32.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lincoff, H, Yannuzzi, L, Singerman, L, Kreissig, I, Fischer, Y. Improvement in visual function after displacement of the retinal elevations eminating from optic pits. Arch Ophthalmol 1993; 111: 1071–9.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Alexander, TA, Billson, FA. Vitrectomy and photocoagulation in the management of serous detachment associated with optic nerve pits. Aust J Ophthalmol 1984; 12: 139–42.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kwang, JL, Peyman, GA. Surgical management of retinal detachment associated with optic pit. Int Ophthalmology 1993; 17: 105–7.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Theodossiadis, G. Treatment of retinal detachment with congenital optic pit by krypton laser photocoagulation. Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 1988; 226: 229.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Jack, K. Central serous retinopathy with optic pit treated with photocoagulation. Am J Ophthalmol 1969; 67: 519–21.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Gordon, R, Chatfield, RK. Pits in the optic disc associated with macular degeneration. Br J Ophthal 1969; 53: 481–9.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Akiba, J, Kakehashi, A, Hickichi, T, Trempe, C. Vitreous findings in cases of optic nerve pits and serous macular detachment. Am J Ophthalmol 1993; 116: 38–41.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ferry, AP. Macular detachment associated with congenital pit of the optic nerve head. Pathologic findings in two cases simulating malignant melanoma of the choroid. Arch Ophthalmol 1963; 70: 346–57.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Lincoff, H, Lopez, R, Kreissig, I, Yanuzzi, L, Cox, M, Burton, T. Retinoschisis associated with optic nerve pits. Arch Ophthalmol 1988; 106: 61–7.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    McDonald, HR, Schatz, H, Johnson, JN. Treatment of retinal detachment associated with optic pits. Int Ophthalmol Clin 1992; 32: 35–42.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Machemer, R. The importance of fluid absorption, traction, intraocular currents, and chorioretinal scars in the therapy of rhegmatogenous retinal detachments. Am J Ophthalmol 1984; 98: 681–93.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Irivine, AR, Crawford, JB, Sullivan, JH. The pathogenesis of retinal detachment with morning glory disc and optic pit. Tr Am Ophth Soc 1986; 84: 280–92.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Rubinstein, K, Mumtaz, A. Complications of optic pits. Trans Ophthal Soc UK 1978; 98: 195–200.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Sugar, HS. Congenital pits of the optic disc. Am J Ophthalmol 1967; 63: 298–307.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Sugar, HS. An explanation for the acquired macular pathology associated with congenital pits of the optic disc. Am J Ophthalmol 1964; 57: 833–5.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Sobol, WM, Boldi, CF, Folk, JC, Weingeist, TA. Long-term visual outcome in patients with optic nerve pit and serous retinal detachment of the macula. Ophthalmology 1990; 97: 1539–42.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Snead, MP, James, N, Jacobs, PM. Vitrectomy, argon laser, and gas tamponade for serous retinal detachment associated with an optic disc pit: a case report. Br J Ophthalmol 1991; 75: 381–2.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Dugel, PU, Smiddy, WE, Byrne, SF, Hughes, JR, Gass, JDM. Macular hole syndromes. Echographic findings with clinical correlation. Ophthalmology 1994; 101: 815–21.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Karl Ulrich Bartz-Schmidt
    • 1
  • Klaus Heimann
    • 1
  • Peter Esser
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Vitreoretinal SurgeryUniversity of CologneKölnGermany

Personalised recommendations