Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Subjacency and S-structure movement of wh-in-situ

Abstract

This paper argues that wh-in-situ in Japanese in fact involves S-structure movement of an invisible entity and therefore that the Subjacency effects discovered and used as evidence for LF Subjacency by Nishigauchi (1986, 1990) and Pesetsky (1987) are due to this S-structure movement. This conclusion is forced on us by the facts that (1) in multiple questions where one of the wh-phrases is inside an island and the other is outside of it, there are no Subjacency effects, contrary to the expectation of the LF Subjacency hypothesis, and that (2) an indirect question constitutes a wh-island for overt movement even though the visible part of the wh-phrase is still in-situ at S-structure.

The research reported here was partially supported by a Fullbright fellowship.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Aoun, Joseph (1985) A Grammar of Anaphora, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

  2. Aoun, Joseph, Norbert Hornstein, and Dominique Sportiche (1981) “Some Aspects of Wide Scope Quantification,” Journal of Linguistic Research, 1:3, 69–95.

  3. Barss, Andrew, Ken Hale, Ellavina T. Perkins, and Margaret Speas (1991) “Logical Form and Barriers in Navajo,” in C.-T. James Huang and Robert May (eds.), Logical Structure and Linguistic Structure, Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 5–47.

  4. Bergvall, Victoria L. (1983) “Wh-questions and Island Constraints in Kikuyu,” in Jonathan Kaye et al. (eds.), Current Approaches to African Linguistics 2, Foris, Dordrecht, pp. 245–260.

  5. Bresnan, Joan and Jane Grimshaw (1978) “The Syntax of Free Relatives in English,” Linguistic Inquiry 9, 331–391.

  6. Choe, Jae W. (1987) “LF Movement and Pied-piping,” Linguistic Inquiry 18, 348–353.

  7. Chomsky, Noam (1973) “Conditions on Transformations.” Reprinted in Noam Chomsky (1977) Essays on Form and Interpretation, North-Holland, New York, pp. 81–160.

  8. Chomsky, Noam (1981) Lectures on Government and Binding, Foris, Dordrecht.

  9. Chomsky, Noam (1986) Barriers, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

  10. Chomsky, Noam (1989) “Some Notes on Economy of Derivation and Representation,” in Itziar Laka and Anoop Mahajan (eds.), MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 10, pp. 43–74.

  11. Cinque, Guglielmo (1990) Types of A′-Dependencies, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

  12. Cole, Peter (1987) “The Structure of Internally Headed Relative Clauses,” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 5, 277–302.

  13. Fiengo, Robert, C.-T. James Huang, Howard Lasnik, and Tanya Reinhart (1988) “The syntax of Wh-in-situ,” WCCFL 7, Proceedings of the Seventh West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, University of California, Irvine, 1988, pp. 81–98.

  14. Fodor, Janet D. (1978) “Parsing Strategies and Constraints on Transformations,” Linguistic Inquiry 9, 427–473.

  15. Frampton, John (1990) “Parasitic Gaps and the Theory of Wh-chains,” Linguistic Inquiry 21, 49–77.

  16. Groos, Anneke and Henk van Riemsdijk (1981) “Matching Effects in Free Relatives,” in Adriana Belletti et al. (eds.), Theory of Markedness in Generative Grammar, Scuola Normale Superiore, Pisa, pp. 171–216.

  17. Haig, John (1976) “Shadow Pronoun Deletion in Japanese,” Linguistic Inquiry 7, 363–371.

  18. Harada, Shin-Ichi (1977) “Nihongo-ni ‘Henkei’-wa Hitsuyoo-da [Japanese needs transformations],” Gengo 6: 10–11.

  19. Heim, Irene (1987) “Where does the Definiteness Restriction Apply?” in Eric Reuland and Alice ter Meulen (eds.), The Representation of (in)definiteness, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, pp. 21–42.

  20. Hoji, Hajime (1985) Logical Form Constraints and Configuraitonal Structures in Japanese, PhD dissertaion, University of Washington.

  21. Huang, C.-T. James (1982) Logical Relations in Chinese and the Theory of Grammar, PhD dissertation, MIT.

  22. Ishii, Yasuo (1988) “Head-internal Relative Clauses in Japanese and Related Issues,” ms., University of Connecticut.

  23. Ishii, Yasuo (1990) “‘Half-relatives’ and Syntactic Operator Movement in Japanese,” in Thomas Green and Sigal Uziel (eds.), MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 12, pp. 80–95.

  24. Ishii, Yasuo (1991) Operators and Empty Categories in Japanese, PhD dissertation, University of Connecticut.

  25. Itô, Junko (1986) “Head Movement at LF and PF,” in Nobuko Hasegawa and Yoshi Kitagawa (eds.), University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers in Linguistics 11, pp. 109–138.

  26. Kayne, Richard S. (1983) “Connectedness,” Reprinted in Richard S. Kayne (1983) Connectedness and Binary Branching, Foris, Dordrecht, pp. 165–192.

  27. Kayne, Richard S. (1991) “Romance Clitics, Verb Movement, and PRO,” Linguistic Inquiry 22, 647–686.

  28. Kikuchi, Akira (1987) “Comparative Deletion in Japanese,” ms., Yamagata University.

  29. Kitagawa, Chisato and Claudia N. G. Ross (1982) “Prenominal Modification in Chinese and Japanese,” Linguistic Analysis 9, 19–53.

  30. Kitagawa, Yoshihisa (1984) “Superiority Effects in Japanese: An Argument for LF,” ms., University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

  31. Kuno, Susumu (1973) The Structure of the Japanese Language, MTT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

  32. Kuno, Susumu and Jane Robinson (1972) “Multiple Wh-questions,” Linguistic Inquiry 3, 463–487.

  33. Kurata, Kiyoshi (1991) The Syntax of Dependent Elements, PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

  34. Kuroda, Shige-Yuki (1974) “Pivot-independent Relativization in Japanese (I),” Papers in Japanese Linguistics 3, 59–96.

  35. Kuroda, Shige-Yuki (1975–76) “Pivot-independent Relativization in Japanese (II),” Papers in Japanese Linguistics 4, 85–96.

  36. Kuroda, Shige-Yuki (1976–77) “Pivot-independent Relativization in Japanese (III),” Papers in Japanese Linguistics 5, 157–179.

  37. Larson, Richard K. (1985) “On the Syntax of Disjunctive Scope,” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 3, 217–264.

  38. Lasnik, Howard and Mamoru Saito (1984) “On the Nature of Proper Government,” Linguistic Inquiry 14, 235–289.

  39. Lasnik, Howard and Mamoru Saito (forthcoming) Move α, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

  40. Lefebvre, Claire and Pieter Muysken (1988) Mixed Categories, Kluwer, Dordrecht.

  41. Longobardi, Giuseppe (1991) “In Defense of the Correspondence Hypothesis: Islands Effects and Parasitic Gap Constructions in Logical Form,” C.-T. James Huang and Robert May (eds.), Logical Structure and Linguistic Structure, Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 149–196.

  42. Nishigauchi, Taisuke (1986) Quantification in Syntax, PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

  43. Nishigauchi, Taisuke (1990) Quantification in the Theory of Grammar, Kluwer, Dordrecht.

  44. Pesetsky, David (1982) Paths and Categories, PhD dissertation, MIT.

  45. Pesetsky, David (1987) “Wh-in-situ,” in Eric Reuland and Alice ter Meulen (eds.), The Representation of (in)definiteness, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, pp. 98–129.

  46. Platero, Paul R. (1974) “The Navajo Relative Clause,” International Journal of American Linguistics 40, 202–246.

  47. Reinhart, Tanya (1991) “Elliptic Conjunctions,” in Asa Kasher (ed.), The Chomskyan Turn, Basil Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 360–384.

  48. Riemsdijk, Henk van and Edwin Williams (1981) “NP-structure,” The Linguistic Review 1, 171–217.

  49. Rizzi, Luigi (1982) Issues in Italian Syntax, Foris, Dordrecht.

  50. Saito, Mamoru (1982) “Scrambling, Topicalization, and Strong Crossover,” ms., MIT.

  51. Saito, Mamoru (1985) Some Asymmetries in Japanese and Their Theoretical Consequences, PhD dissertation, MIT.

  52. Saito, Mamoru (1989a) “Crossing and WH-Q Binding,” talk presented at the Ohio State University.

  53. Saito, Mamoru (1989b) “Scrambling as Semantically Vacuous A′-movement,” in Mark R. Baltin and Anthony S. Kroch (eds.), Alternative Conceptions of Phrase Structure, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 182–200.

  54. Tellier, Christine (1989) “Head-internal Relatives and Parasitic Gaps in Mooré,” in Isabelle Haïk and Laurice Tuller (eds.), Current Approaches to African Linguistics 6, Foris, Dordrecht, pp. 298–318.

  55. Watanabe, Akira (1991) “Wh-in-situ, Subjacency, and Chain Formation,” ms., MIT.

  56. Watanabe, Akira (in preparation) “S-structure Movement for Wh-in-situ,” ms., MIT.

  57. Williamson, Janis S. (1987) “An Indefiniteness Restriction for Relative Clauses in Lakhota,” in Eric Reuland and Alice ter Meulen (eds.), The Representation of (in)definiteness, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, pp. 168–190.

Download references

Author information

Additional information

I would like to express thanks to Noam Chomsky and David Pesetsky for extensive discussions, suggestions, and comments, to Lisa Cheng, Irene Heim, Hiroaki Tada, and Ken Wexler for discussions, and Tohru Noguchi, Mamoru Saito, and Hiroyuki Ura for comments. Comments by two JEAL reviewers on an earlier version contributed to improvement at various points. I am also grateful to Jun Abe, Tom Green, Jim Huang, Doug Jones, Hisatsugu Kitahara, Miyori Kubo, Toshifusa Oka, Chris Tancredi, Saeko Urushibara, and Sigal Uziel for discussions and/or judgments. I have also benefited from the audience at the GB syntax workshop at the 1991 LSA Linguistic Institute at UC Santa Cruz and a presentation at the Japanese workshop at MIT in 1991, where portions of this work were presented. The usual disclaimers apply.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Watanabe, A. Subjacency and S-structure movement of wh-in-situ. J East Asian Linguis 1, 255–291 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00130554

Download citation

Keywords

  • Visible Part
  • Theoretical Language
  • Multiple Question
  • Overt Movement
  • Indirect Question