Journal of Muscle Research & Cell Motility

, Volume 16, Issue 6, pp 629–639 | Cite as

Comparison of the foetal development of muscle in normal and double-muscled cattle

  • B. Picard
  • H. Gagnière
  • J. Robelin
  • Y. Geay
Papers

Summary

Muscle differentiation was studied in foetal Semitendinosus muscle from normal cattle and those with the ‘culard’ gene of muscular hypertrophy sampled at 90, 130, 170 and 210 days of foetal life. The different fibre types were characterized by immunohistochemistry with antibodies specific to different isoforms of myosin heavy chains. The isoforms were separated by electrophoresis, identified by immunoblotting and quantified by ELISA. In double-muscled animals, there was a slower rate of differentiation in the first generation of cells, most markedly apparent at 90 days. At 130 days, differentiation was retarded mainly in the second generation, while at 170 days there was no longer any difference between the two animal types in the differentiation of first generation cells, which were totally slow in both. At the same stage however, type IIC fibres in double-muscled animals were much slower in appearing and continued to be so at 210 days, albeit to a lesser extent. These findings show that differentiation of the muscle fibres occurs at a slower rate in double-muscled foetuses particularly during the first two-thirds of foetal life.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. ASHMORE, C. R. & ROBINSON, D. W. (1969) Hereditary muscular hypertrophy in the bovine. Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. and Med. 132, 548–54.Google Scholar
  2. BäR, A. & PETTE, D. (1988) Three fast myosin heavy chains in adult rat skeletal muscle. FEBS Lett. 235, 153–5.Google Scholar
  3. BRADFORD, M. M. (1976) A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal. Biochem. 72, 248–54.Google Scholar
  4. CLOSE, R. (1967) Dynamic properties of fast and slow skeletal muscles of mammals. In Exploratory concepts in muscular dystrophy and related disorders (edited by A. T., MILHORAT) p. 142. Amsterdam: Excerpta Med. Foud.Google Scholar
  5. GERRARD, D. E. & GRANT, A. L. (1994) Insulin-like growth factor II expression in developping skeletal muscle of double muscled and normal cattle. Dom. Anim. End. 11, 339–47.Google Scholar
  6. GERRARD, D. E. & JUDGE, M. D. (1993) Induction of myoblast proliferation in L6 myoblast cultures by fetal serum of double-muscled and normal cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 71, 1464–70.Google Scholar
  7. GUTMAN, E. (1967) Basic muscle type differentiation. In Exploratory concepts in muscular dystrophy and related disorders (edited by A. T., MILHORAT) p. 132. Amsterdam: Excerpta Med. Foud.Google Scholar
  8. HOLMES, J. H. G. & ASHMORE, C. R. (1972) A histochemical study of muscle fiber type and size in normal and double muscled cattle. Growth, 36, 351–72.Google Scholar
  9. KING, J. W. B. & MéNISSIER, F. (1982) Muscle hypertrophy of genetic origin and its use to improve beef production. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.Google Scholar
  10. LAEMMLI, U. K. (1970) Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 227, 680–5.Google Scholar
  11. LEGER, J. O. C., BOUVAGNET, P., PAU, B., RONCUCCI, R. & LEGER, J. J. (1985) Levels of ventricular myosin fragments in human sera after myocardial infarction, determined with monoclonal antibodies to myosin heavy chains. Eur. J. Cli. Inv. 15, 422–9.Google Scholar
  12. OUHAYOUN, J. & BEAUMONT, A. (1968) Etude du caractère culard: III. Anatomic microscopique comparée du tissu musculaire de mâle charolais normaux et culards. Ann. Zootech. 17, 213–23.Google Scholar
  13. PICARD, B., LéGER, J. O. C. & ROBELIN, J. (1994a) Quantitative determination of type I MHC in bovine muscle with monoclonal antibodies. Meat Sci. 36, 333–45.Google Scholar
  14. PICARD, B., ROBELIN, J., PONS, F. & GEAY, Y. (1994b) Comparison of the foetal development of fibre types in four bovine muscles. J. Muscle Res. Cell Motil. 15, 473–86.Google Scholar
  15. PONS, F., LéGER, J. O. C., CHEVALLAY, M., TOMé, F. M. S., FARDEAU, M. & LéGER, J. J. (1986) Immunocytochemical analysis of myosin heavy chains in human fetal skeletal muscles. J. Neurol. Sci. 76, 151–63.Google Scholar
  16. QUINN, L. S., ONG, L. D. & ROEDER, R. A. (1990) Paracrine control of myoblast proliferation and differentiation by fibroblasts. Dev. Biol. 140, 8–19.Google Scholar
  17. ROBELIN, J., LACOURT, A., BéCHET, D., FERRARA, M., BRIAND, Y. & GEAY, Y. (1991) Muscle differentiation in the bovine fetus: a histological and histochemical approach. Growth Development ε Aging 55, 151–60.Google Scholar
  18. ROBELIN, J., PICARD, B., LISTRAT, A., JURIE, C., BARBOIRON, C., PONS, F. & GEAY, Y. (1993) Myosin transitions in Semitendinosus muscle during fetal development of cattle: immunocytochemical and electrophoretic analyses. Reprod. Nutr. Dev. 33, 25–41.Google Scholar
  19. SUGUIRA, T., & MURAKAMI, N. (1990) Separation of myosin heavy chain isoforms in rat skeletal muscles by gradient sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Biomed. Res. 11, 87–91.Google Scholar
  20. SWATLAND, H. J. & KIEFFER, N. M. (1974) Fetal development of the doubled muscled condition in cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 38, 752–7.Google Scholar
  21. TOWBIN, H., STAEHLIN, T. & GORDON, J. (1979) Electrophoretic transfer of proteins from polyacrylamide gels to nitrocellolose sheets: procedure and some applications. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 76, 4350–4.Google Scholar
  22. WINKELMANN, D. A., LOWEY, S. & PRESS, J. L. (1983) Monoclonal antibodies localize changes on myosin heavy chain isozymes during avian myogenesis. Cell. 34, 295–306.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Chapman & Hall 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • B. Picard
    • 1
  • H. Gagnière
    • 1
  • J. Robelin
    • 1
  • Y. Geay
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratoire Croissance et Métabolismes des HerbivoresU. R. Croissance Musculaire, INRA, THEIXSaint-Genés-ChampanelleFrance

Personalised recommendations