Biology and Philosophy

, Volume 7, Issue 2, pp 135–160 | Cite as

Telling the tree: Narrative representation and the study of evolutionary history

  • Robert J. O'Hara


Accounts of the evolutionary past have as much in common with works of narrative history as they do with works of science. Awareness of the narrative character of evolutionary writing leads to the discovery of a host of fascinating and hitherto unrecognized problems in the representation of evolutionary history, problems associated with the writing of narrative. These problems include selective attention, narrative perspective, foregrounding and backgrounding, differential resolution, and the establishment of a canon of important events. The narrative aspects of evolutionary writing, however, which promote linearity and cohesiveness in conventional stories, conflict with the underlying chronicle of evolution, which is not linear, but branched, and which does not cohere, but diverges. The impulse to narrate is so great, however, and is so strongly reinforced by traditional schemes of taxonomic attention, that natural historians have more often abandoned the diverging tree than they have abandoned the narrative mode of representation. If we are to understand the true nature of the evolutionary past then we must adopt “tree thinking”, and develop new and creative ways, both narrative and non-narrative, of telling the history of life.

Key words

Cladistics classification evolutionary history narrative natural history natural system philosophy of history philosophy of science phylogeny progress systematics tree thinking tree topology 


  1. American Ornithologists' Union: 1983, Check-list of North American Birds, sixth edition, American Ornithologists' Union.Google Scholar
  2. Atran, S.: 1990, Cognitive Foundations of Natural History: Towards an Anthropology of Science, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  3. Bailyn, B.: 1967, The Ideological Origins of the American Revolution, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  4. Barrett, P. H.: 1960, ‘A Transcription of Darwin's First Notebook on “Transmutation of Species”’, Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology 122, 247–296.Google Scholar
  5. Bonnet, C.: 1745, Traité d'Insectologie, Premier Parte, Durand, Paris.Google Scholar
  6. Borges, J. L.: 1964, ‘The Garden of Forking Paths’, in Labyrinths: Selected Stories and Other Writings, New Directions, New York, pp. 19–29.Google Scholar
  7. Buckland, F.: 1874, Curiosities of Natural History, Richard Bentley and Son, London.Google Scholar
  8. Butterfield, H.: 1931, The Whig Interpretation of History, George Bell & Sons, London.Google Scholar
  9. Carroll, R. L.: 1988, vertebrate Paleontology and Evolution, W. H. Freeman and Company, New York.Google Scholar
  10. Danto, A. C.: 1985, Narration and Knowledge, Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  11. Downs, R. M., and D. Stea: 1977, Maps in Minds: Reflections on Cognitive Mapping, Harper & Row, New York.Google Scholar
  12. Dray, W.: 1989, On History and Philosophers of History, E. J. Brill, Leiden.Google Scholar
  13. Durrell, L.: 1957, Justine, E. P. Dutton & Co., Inc., New York.Google Scholar
  14. Durrell, L.: 1958, Balthazar, E. P. Dutton & Co., Inc., New York.Google Scholar
  15. Durrell, L.: 1959, Mountolive, E. P. Dutton & Co., Inc., New York.Google Scholar
  16. Fernholm, B., K. Bremer, L. Brundin, H. Jörnvall, L. Rutberg, and H.-E. Wanntorp (organizing committee): 1989, The Hierarchy of Life: Molecules and Morphology in Phylogenetic Analysis, Proceedings from Nobel Symposium 70, Excerpta Medica, Amsterdam, New York, and Oxford.Google Scholar
  17. Feyerabend, P. K.: 1988, Against Method, revised edition, Verso, London.Google Scholar
  18. Gallie, W. B.: 1964, Philosophy and the Historical Understanding, Schocken Books, New York.Google Scholar
  19. Gardner, J.: 1971, Grendel, Knopf, New York.Google Scholar
  20. Gauthier, J., D. Cannatella, K. de Queeiroz, A. G. Kluge, and T. Rowe: 1989, ‘Tetrapod Phylogeny’, in B. Fernholm et al. (eds.), The Hierarchy of Life, Excerpta Medica, Amsterdam, pp. 337–353.Google Scholar
  21. Gonick, L.: 1990, The Cartoon History of the Universe, Doubleday, New York.Google Scholar
  22. Gould, P., and R. White: 1986, Mental Maps, second edition, Allen & Unwin, Boston.Google Scholar
  23. Gould, S. J.: 1987, Time's Arrow, Time's Cycle, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  24. Gould, S. J.: 1989, Wonderful Life: The Burgess Shale and the Nature of History, W. W. Norton & Company, New York.Google Scholar
  25. Greene, J. C.: 1961, The Death of Adam, Mentor Books, New York.Google Scholar
  26. Haynes, R. M.: 1980, Geographical Images and Mental Maps, Macmillan Education Ltd., Houndmills.Google Scholar
  27. Hull, D. L.: 1988, Science as a Process, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  28. Landau, M.: 1991, Narratives of Human Evolution, Yale University Press, New Haven.Google Scholar
  29. Larson, G.: 1989, The Prehistory of the Far Side: A 10th Anniversary Exhibit, Andrews and McMeel, Kansas City.Google Scholar
  30. Lewin, R.: 1982, Thread of Life: The Smithsonian Looks at Evolution, Smithsonian Books, Washington, D. C.Google Scholar
  31. Lovejoy, A. O.: 1936, The Great Chain of Being, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  32. Mallory, J. P.: 1989, In Search of the Indo-Europeans: Language, Archeology and Myth, Thames and Hudson, London.Google Scholar
  33. Mayr, E., and J. C. Greenway, Jr.: 1956, ‘Sequence of Passerine Families (Aves)’, Breviora 58.Google Scholar
  34. Mink, L. O.: 1987, Historical Understanding, Cornell University Press, Ithaca.Google Scholar
  35. Nagel, E.: 1959, ‘The Logic of Historical Analysis’, in H. Meyerhoff (ed.), The Philosophy of History in Our Time, Doubleday, Garden City, pp. 203–215.Google Scholar
  36. National Geographic Society: 1990, National Geographic Atlas of the World, sixth edition, National Geographic Society, Washington, D. C.Google Scholar
  37. Nitecki, M. H. (ed.): 1988, Evolutionary Progress, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  38. O'Hara, R. J.: 1988a, ‘Homage to Clio, or, Toward an Historical Philosophy for Evolutionary Biology’, Systematic Zoology 37, 142–155.Google Scholar
  39. O'Hara, R. J.: 1988b, ‘Diagrammatic Classifications of Birds, 1819–1901: Views of the Natural System in 19th-Century British Ornithology’, in H. Ouellet (ed.), Acta XIX Congressus Internationalis Ornithologici, National Museum of Natural Sciences, Ottawa, pp. 2746–2759.Google Scholar
  40. O'Hara, R. J.: 1991, ‘Representations of the Natural System in the Nineteenth Century’, Biology and Philosophy 6, 255–274.Google Scholar
  41. Patterson, D. J.: 1988, ‘The Evolution of Protozoa’, Memorias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro, Supplemento I 83, 580–600.Google Scholar
  42. de Queiroz, K.: 1988, ‘Systematics and the Darwin ian Revolution’, Philosophy of Science 55, 238–259.Google Scholar
  43. Raikow, R. J.: 1986, ‘Why Are There so Many Kinds of Passerine Birds’, Systematic Zoology 35, 255–259.Google Scholar
  44. Raikow, R. J.: 1988, ‘The Analysis of Evolutionary Success’, Systematic Zoology 37, 76–79.Google Scholar
  45. Reader, J.: 1986, The Rise of Life: The First 3.5 Billion Years, Knopf, New York.Google Scholar
  46. Richards, R. J.: 1987, Darwin and the Emergence of Evolutionary Theories of Mind and Behavior, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  47. Romer, A. S.: 1959, The Vertebrate Story, fourth edition, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  48. Rouse, J.: 1990, ‘The Narrative Reconstruction of Science’, Inquiry 33, 179–196.Google Scholar
  49. Savage, H. M.: 1983, ‘The Shape of Evolution: Systematic Tree Topology’, Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 20, 225–244.Google Scholar
  50. Scholes, R., and R. Kellogg: 1966, The Nature of Narrative, Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  51. Shao, K.-T., and R. R. Sokal: 1990, ‘Tree Balance’, Systematic Zoology 39, 266–276.Google Scholar
  52. Sloan, P. R.: 1987, ‘From Logical Universals to Historical Individuals: Buffon's Idea of Biological Species’, in Histoire du Concept d'Espèce dans les Sciences de la Vie, Fondation Singer-Polignac, Paris, pp. 101–140.Google Scholar
  53. Stevens, P. F.: 1990, ‘Nomenclatura Stability, Taxonomic Instinct, and Flora Writing — a Recipe for Disaster?’, in P. Baas et al. (eds.), The Plant Diversity of Malesia, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp. 387–410.Google Scholar
  54. Toulmin, S.: 1982, The Return to Cosmology: Postmodern Science and the Theology of Nature, University of California Press, Berkeley.Google Scholar
  55. Toulmin, S.: 1988, ‘The Recovery of Practical Philosophy’, American Scholar 57, 337–352.Google Scholar
  56. Toulmin, S.: 1990, Cosmopolis: The Hidden Agenda of Modernity, The Free Press, New York.Google Scholar
  57. Toulmin, S., and J. Goodfield: 1965, The Discovery of Time, Harper & Row, New York.Google Scholar
  58. White, H.: 1973, Metahistory: The Historical Imagination in Nineteenth-Century Europe, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.Google Scholar
  59. White, H.: 1987, The Content of the Form, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.Google Scholar
  60. White, M.: 1965, Foundations of Historical Knowledge, Harper & Row, New York.Google Scholar
  61. Wiley, E. O.: 1980, ‘Is the Evolutionary Species Concept Fiction? — A Consideration of Classes, Individuals and Historical Entities’, Systematic Zoology 29, 76–80.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert J. O'Hara
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Philosophy and The Zoological MuseumUniversity of Wisconsin — MadisonMadisonU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations