Landscape Ecology

, Volume 10, Issue 4, pp 229–237 | Cite as

Culture and changing landscape structure

  • Joan Iverson Nassauer
Article

Abstract

Culture changes landscapes and culture is embodied by landscapes. Both aspects of this dynamic are encompassed by landscape ecology, but neither has been examined sufficiently to produce cultural theory within the field. This paper describes four broad cultural principles for landscape ecology, under which more precise principles might be organized. A central underlying premise is that culture and landscape interact in a feedback loop in which culture structures landscapes and landscapes inculcate culture. The following broad principles are proposed:
  1. 1.

    Human landscape perception, cognition, and values directly affect the landscape and are affected by the landscape.

     
  2. 2.

    Cultural conventions powerfully influence landscape pattern in both inhabited and apparently natural landscapes.

     
  3. 3.

    Cultural concepts of nature are different from scientific concepts of ecological function.

     
  4. 4.

    The appearance of landscapes communicates cultural values.

     

Both the study of landscapes at a human scale and experimentation with possible landscapes, landscape patterns invented to accommodate ecological function, are recommended as means of achieving more precise cultural principles.

Keywords

culture change perception theory landscape ecology 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Appleton, J. 1975. The experience of landscape. John Wiley and Sons. New York.Google Scholar
  2. Baker, W.L. 1989. A review of models of landscape change. Landscape Ecol. 2: 111–133.Google Scholar
  3. Balling, J.D. and Falk, J.H. 1982. Development of visual preferences for natural environments. Environment and Behavior. 14: 5–28.Google Scholar
  4. Bormann, F.H., Balmori, D. and Geballe, G.T. 1993. Redesigning the American lawn. Yale University Press, New Haven.Google Scholar
  5. Bourassa, S.C. 1991. The Aesthetics of Landscape. Bellhaven Press. London.Google Scholar
  6. Bourassa, S.C. 1992. Public welfare and the economics of landscape aesthetics. Landscape and Urban Planning 22: 31–40.Google Scholar
  7. Buss, S. 1994. Private landowner's values for rare species and natural communities. Unpublished thesis. University of Minnesota.Google Scholar
  8. Caldwell, L.K. 1990. Landscape, law and public policy: Conditions for an ecological perspective. Landscape Ecol. 5: 3–8.Google Scholar
  9. Caravello, G.U. and Giaconim, F. 1993. Landscape ecology aspects in a territory centuriated in Roman times. Landscape and Urban Planning 24: 77–85.Google Scholar
  10. Crandell, G. 1993. Nature pictorialized. Johns Hopkins University Press. Baltimore.Google Scholar
  11. Farina, A. 1993. From global to regional landscape ecology Landscape Ecol. 8: 153–154.Google Scholar
  12. Forman, R.T.T. and Godron, M. 1986. Landscape Ecol. John Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  13. Garling, T. et al., 1984. Cognitive mapping of large-scale environments. Environment and Behavior. 16: 3–34.Google Scholar
  14. Gibson, J.J. 1979. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Houghton-Mifflin Company, Boston.Google Scholar
  15. Golledge, R.G. and Stimson, R.J. 1987. Analytical Behavioural Geography. Croom Helm, Ltd. Beckenham, Kent.Google Scholar
  16. Goodenough, W.H. 1970. Description and comparison in cultural anthropology. Aldine Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  17. Hartshorne, R. 1959. Perspective on the nature of geography. Association of American Geographers.Google Scholar
  18. Ittelson, W.H. 1973. Environment and Cognition. Seminar Press, New York.Google Scholar
  19. Jackson, J.B. 1984. Discovering the Vernacular Landscape. Yale University Press. New Haven. 165 pp.Google Scholar
  20. Kaplan, S. and Kaplan, R. 1982. Cognition and environment: Functioning in an Uncertain World. Praeger Publishers, New York.Google Scholar
  21. Kaplan, S. 1987. Aesthetics, Affect, and Cognition. Environmental Preference from an Evolutionary Perspective. Environment and Behavior. 19: 3–32.Google Scholar
  22. Lowenthal, D. and Prince, H.C. 1965. English landscape tastes. The Geographical Review. 55: 186–222.Google Scholar
  23. Lynch, K. 1960. The image of the city. MIT Press. Cambridge.Google Scholar
  24. Lynch, K. 1971. Site Planning. Second ed. MIT Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  25. Martin, R.D. 1993. Suburban residents' perception of wildlife habitat patches and corridors in their neighborhoods. Unpublished masters thesis. University of Minnesota.Google Scholar
  26. McGuire, I. 1979. Managing the forest landscape for pubic expectations. In: Our national landscape: A conference on applied techniques for analysis and management of the visual resource. pp. 16-18. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report PSW-35. Berkeley.Google Scholar
  27. Nasar, J.L. 1993. Proximate physical cues to fear of crime. Landscape and Urban Planning 26: 161–178.Google Scholar
  28. Nash, R. 1967. Wilderness and the American mind. Yale University Press. New Haven.Google Scholar
  29. Nassauer, J.I. and Westmacott, R. 1987. Progressiveness Among farmers as a factor in heterogeneity of farmed landscapes. In Landscape Heterogeneity and Disturbance. M.G. Turner, ed. Springer-Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
  30. Nassauer, J.I. 1988a. The aesthetics of horticulture: neatness as a form of care. HortSci. 23: 6.Google Scholar
  31. Nassauer, J.I. 1988b. Landscape care: perceptions of local people in landscape ecology and sustainable development. Landscape and Land Use Planning. 8. Amer. Soc. of Landscape Architects, Washington DC.Google Scholar
  32. Nassauer, J.I. 1992. The appearance of ecological systems as a matter of policy. Landscape Ecol. 6: 239–250.Google Scholar
  33. Nassauer, J.I. 1993. Ecological function and the perception of suburban residential landscapes. In Gobster, P.H., ed., Managing Urban and High Use Recreation Settings. General Technical Report, USDA Forest Service North Central Forest Experiment Station, St. Paul, MN.Google Scholar
  34. Nassauer, J.I. 1995. Messy ecosystems, orderly frames. Landscape Journal In press.Google Scholar
  35. Naveh, Z. 1982. Landscape ecology as an emerging branch of human ecosystem science. In: Advances in Ecological Research. 12. Academic Press, London. pp. 189–237.Google Scholar
  36. Naveh, Z. 1991. Some remarks on recent developments in landscape ecology as a transdisciplinary ecological and geographical science. Landscape Ecol. 5: 65–74.Google Scholar
  37. Random House. 1987. The Random House dictionary of the English language. Second Ed. Unabridged.Google Scholar
  38. Rapoport, A. 1982. The Meaning of the Built Environment. SAGE Publications. Beverly Hills, CA.Google Scholar
  39. Risser, P.G., Karr, J.R. and Forman R.T.T. 1984. Landscape ecology: directions and approaches. Illinois Natural History Survey, Publication No. 2.Google Scholar
  40. Risser, P.G. 1987. Landscape ecology: state of the art. In Landscape heterogeneity and disturbance. M.G. Turner, ed. Springer-Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
  41. Schreiber, K. 1989. The history of landscape ecology in Europe. In Changing landscapes: an ecological perspective. Zonnenveld, I.S. and Forman, R.T.T., eds. Springer-Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
  42. Schroeder, H.W. and Anderson, L.M. 1984. Perception of personal safety in urban recreation sites. Journal of Leisure Research. 16: 178–194.Google Scholar
  43. Segall, M.H., Campbell, D.T. and Herskovitz, M.J. 1966. The influence of culture on perception. Bobbs-Merrill Company, Indianapolis.Google Scholar
  44. Sell, J.L., et al., 1984. Toward a theoretical framework for landscape perception. In Environmental perception and Behavior: An Inventory and Prospect. Saarinen, T.F., et al., eds. University of Chicago, Department of Geography Research Paper #209. pp. 61-84.Google Scholar
  45. Stein, Sara. 1993. Noah's garden. Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston. 294 pp.Google Scholar
  46. Tolman, E.C. 1948. Cognitive maps in rats and men. Psychological Review. 55: 189–208.Google Scholar
  47. USDA Forest Service. 1974. The visual management system. Handbook 462. USGPO, Washington.Google Scholar
  48. Wiens, J.A. and Milne, B.T. 1989. Scaling of landscapes in landscape ecology, or, landscape ecology from a beetle's perspective. Landscape Ecol. 2: 87–96.Google Scholar
  49. Wiens, J.A. 1992. What is landscape ecology, really? Landscape Ecology 3: 149–150.Google Scholar
  50. Wood, D. 1988. Unnatural illusions: some words about visual resource management. Landscape Journal7:2: 192–205.Google Scholar
  51. Zube, E.H., Pitt, D.G. and Anderson, T.W. 1979. Perception and measurement of scenic resources of the Southern Connecticut River Valley. Institute for Man and the Environment, Amherst.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© SPB Academic Publishing bv 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joan Iverson Nassauer
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Landscape ArchitectureUniversity of MinnesotaMinneapolisUSA

Personalised recommendations