Landscape Ecology

, Volume 10, Issue 4, pp 219–228 | Cite as

Change in spatial characteristics of forest openings in the Klamath Mountains of northwestern California, USA

  • Carl N. Skinner
Article

Abstract

Change in the spatial characteristics of forest openings was investigated in three forested watersheds in north-western Siskiyou County, California totalling approximately 24,600 hectares. Watersheds with minimal human disturbance were chosen for study. However, fire suppression has been pervasive throughout. Characteristics of forest openings (area, perimeter, distance between neighboring openings) were measured on aerial photographs taken 41 years apart. An index of regional form was determined for the landscape. Shape complexity for each opening was calculated using two indices based upon fractals. Significant differences were found using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov two-sample test between the perimeters, areas, distance from sample point to nearest opening, and distance between neighboring openings. The perimeters and areas became smaller, and the distances from the sample point to the nearest opening and between neighboring openings became greater over the 41 years between aerial photo sets. The estimated area occupied by openings decreased from 25.8 % to 15.6 % of the study area. No significant difference was found in the shape of the openings except as the shape indices were influenced by changes in size of the openings.

Keywords

California forest openings Klamath Mountains spatial attributes landscape change landscape ecology 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Agee, J.K. 1991. Fire history along an elevational gradient in the Siskiyou Mountains, Oregon. Northwest Science 65: 188–199.Google Scholar
  2. Atzet, T. and Martin, R. 1992. Natural disturbance regimes in the Klamath Province. In Proceedings of the Symposium on Biodiversity of Northwestern California, pp. 40–48. Edited by R.R. Harris, D.E. Erman, and H.M. Kerner. Univ. of California, Wildland Resources Center Report No. 29. Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
  3. Atzet, T. and Wheeler, D.L. 1982. Historical and ecological perspectives on fire activity in the Klamath geological province of the Rogue River and Siskiyou National Forests. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Region, Portland, OR. Pub. R-6-Range-102.Google Scholar
  4. Austin, R.F. 1984. Measuring and comparing two-dimensional shapes. In Spatial Statistics and Models, pp. 293–312. Edited by G.L. Gaile and C. J. Willmott. D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  5. Baker, W.L. 1989. Landscape ecology and nature reserve design in the Boundary Waters Canoe Area, Minnesota. Ecology 70: 23–25.Google Scholar
  6. Bingham, B.B. and Sawyer, J.O., Jr. 1991. Distinctive features and definitions of young, mature and old-growth Douglas-fir/hardwood forests. In Wildlife and Vegetation of Unmanaged Douglas-fir Forests, pp. 362–377. Tech. Coords. L.F. Ruggiero, K.B. Aubry, A.B. Carey, and M.H. Huff. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Forest and Range Experiment Station, Portland, OR. Gen. Tech. Rept. PNW-285.Google Scholar
  7. Christensen, N.L. Jr. 1991. Variable fire regimes on complex landscapes: Ecological consequences, policy implications, and managements strategies. In Fire and the Environment: Ecological and Cultural Perspectives. pp. ix–xiv. Edited by S.C. Nodvin and T.A. Waldrop. USDA Forest Service, South-eastern Forest Experiment Station, Gen. Tech. Rept. SE-69.Google Scholar
  8. Davis, J.C. 1986. Statistics and data analysis in geology. Second Edition. John Wiley & Sons, New York.Google Scholar
  9. De Cola, L. 1989. Fractal analysis of a classified landsat scene. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 55: 601–610.Google Scholar
  10. Edmonds, R.L. 1979. Western coniferous forests: how forest management has changed them. Biology Digest 5: 12–23.Google Scholar
  11. Forman, R.T.T. and Godron, M. 1986. Landscape ecology. John Wiley and Sons, New York.Google Scholar
  12. Franklin, J.F. and Forman, R.T.T. 1987. Creating landscape patterns by forest cutting: Ecological consequences and principles. Landscape Ecology 1: 5–18.Google Scholar
  13. Griffith, D.A., O'Neill, M.P., O'Neill, W.A., Leifer, L.A. and Mooney, R.G. 1986. Shape indices: useful measures or red herrings? Professional Geographer 38: 263–270.Google Scholar
  14. Harris, L.D. 1984. The fragmented forest: Island biogeography theory and the preservation of biotic diversity. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois.Google Scholar
  15. Heinselman, M. 1978. Fire in wilderness ecosystems. In Wilderness Management, pp. 248–278. Edited by J.C. Hendee, G.H. Stankey and R.C. Lucas. USDA Forest Service, Miscellaneous Publication No. 1365.Google Scholar
  16. Helms, J.A. 1987. Invasion of Pinus conforta var. murrayana (Pinaceae) into mountain meadows at Yosemite National Park, California. Madrono 34: 91–97.Google Scholar
  17. Kilgore, B.M. 1981. Fire in ecosystem distribution and structure: western forests and scrublands. In Proceedings of the Conference Fire Regimes and Ecosystem Properties, pp. 58–89. Tech. Coords. H.A. Mooney, T.M. Bonnicksen, N.L. Christensen, J.E. Lotan, and W.A. Reiners. USDA Forest Service, Gen. Tech. Rept. WO-26.Google Scholar
  18. Knight, D.H. 1987. Parasites, lightning, and the vegetation mosaic in wilderness landscapes. In Landscape Heterogeneity and Disturbance, pp. 59–83. Edited by M.G. Turner. Springer-Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
  19. Krummel, J.R., Gardner, R.H., Sugihara, G., O'Neill R.V. and Coleman, P.R. 1987. Landscape patterns in a disturbed environment. Oikos 48: 321–324.Google Scholar
  20. Mladenoff, D.J., White, M.A., Pastor, J. and Crow, T.R. 1993. Comparing spatial pattern in unaltered old-growth and disturbed forest landscapes. Ecological Applications 3: 294–306.Google Scholar
  21. Milne, B.T. 1991. Lessons from applying fractal models to landscape patterns. In Quantitative Methods in Landscape Ecology, pp. 199–235. Edited by M.G. Turner and R.H. Gardner. Springer-Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
  22. O'Neill, R.V., Krummel, J.R., Gardner, R.H., Sugihara, G., Jackson, B., DeAngelis, D.L., Milne, B.T., Turner, M.G., Zugmunt, B., Christensen, S.W., Dale, V.H. and Graham, R.L. 1988. Indices of landscape pattern. Landscape Ecology 1: 153–162.Google Scholar
  23. Overton, W.S. 1993. Probability sampling and population inference in monitoring programs. In Environmental Monitoring with GIS. pp. 470–480. Edited by M.F. Goodchild, B.O. Parks, and L.T. Steyaert. Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  24. Parker, A.J. 1987. Morphological divergence between conifer forests of Yosemite and Glacier National Parks, U.S.A. Arctic and Alpine Research 19: 252–260.Google Scholar
  25. Parsons, D. J. and DeBenedetti, S.H. 1979. Impact of fire suppression on a mixed-conifer forest. Forest Ecology and Management 2: 21–33.Google Scholar
  26. Rex, K.D. and Malanson, G.P. 1990. The fractal shape of riparian forest patches. Landscape Ecology 4: 249–258.Google Scholar
  27. Savage, M. 1991. Structural dynamics of a southwestern pine forest under chronic human influence. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 81: 271–289.Google Scholar
  28. Sawyer, J.O. and Thornburgh, D.A. 1977. Montane and subalpine vegetation of the Klamath Mountains. In Terrestrial Vegetation of California, pp. 699–732. Edited by M.G. Barbour and J. Major. John Wiley & Sons, New York.Google Scholar
  29. Sawyer, J.O., Thornburgh, D.A., and Griffin, J.R. 1977. Mixed evergreen forest. In Terrestrial Vegetation of California. pp. 359–381. Edited by M.G. Barbour and J. Major. John Wiley & Sons, New York.Google Scholar
  30. Sousa, W.P. 1984. The role of disturbance in natural communities. Annual Review of Ecology & Systematics 15: 353–391.Google Scholar
  31. Swanson, F.J., Franklin, J.F. and Sedell, J.R. 1990. Landscape patterns, disturbance, and management in the Pacific North-west, USA. In Changing Landscapes: An Ecological Perspective. pp. 191–213. Edited by I.S. Zonneveld and R.T.T. Forman. Springer-Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
  32. Taylor, A.H. 1990. Tree invasion in meadows of Lassen Volcanic National Park. Professional Geographer 53: 457–470.Google Scholar
  33. Upton, G. and Fingleton, B. 1985. Spatial Data Analysis by Example, Vol. 1: Point Pattern and Quantitative Data. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Chichester, Great Britain.Google Scholar
  34. USDA Forest Service. 1990. Baldy Fire Recovery Project: Final Environmental Impact Statement. Pacific Southwest Region, Klamath National Forest, Yreka, CA.Google Scholar
  35. Vale, T.R. 1977. Forest changes in the Warner Mountains, California. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 67: 28–45.Google Scholar
  36. Vale, T.R. 1981. Ages of invasive trees in Dana Meadows, Yosemite National Park, California. Madrono 28: 45–47.Google Scholar
  37. White, P.S. and Pickett, S.T.A. 1985. Natural disturbance and patch dynamics: an introduction. In The Ecology of Natural Disturbance and Patch Dynamics, pp. 3–13. Edited by S.T.A. Pickett and P.S. White. Academic Press, Inc., San Diego.Google Scholar
  38. Whittaker, R.H. 1960. Vegetation of the Siskiyou Mountains, Oregon and California. Ecological Monographs 30: 279–338.Google Scholar
  39. Wills, R.D. 1991. Fire history and stand development of Douglas-fir/hardwood forests in northern California. Unpublished M.S. Thesis, Humboldt State University, Arcata, CA.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© SPB Academic Publishing bv 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Carl N. Skinner
    • 1
  1. 1.U.S.D.A. Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station, Silviculture LaboratoryReddingUSA

Personalised recommendations