Biotechnology Letters

, Volume 17, Issue 8, pp 821–826 | Cite as

Role of hydrolysis conditions in the enzyme-mediated release of reducing sugars from sulphite pulp

  • L. P. Christov
  • B. A. Prior
Article

Summary

The release of reducing sugars from sulphite pulp treated with an Aureobasidium pullulans xylanase preparation was studied. Hydrolysis conditions such as pH, buffer, temperature and time of enzyme treatment were optimized in terms of their effect on sulphite pulp for production of dissolving pulp with an improved quality. Enzyme hydrolysis of pulp was found to be most effective at a temperature of 55°C and at pH 4.7 using sodium acetate buffer.

Keywords

Enzyme Sodium Acetate Sugar Hydrolysis 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Christov, L.P. and Prior, B.A. (1993). Biotechnol. Lett. 15, 1269–1274.Google Scholar
  2. Christov, L.P. and Prior, B.A. (1994). Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 42, 492–498.Google Scholar
  3. Clark, T.A., McDonald, A.G., Senior, D.J. and Mayers, P.R. (1990). In: Biotechnology in Pulp and Paper Manufacture, T.K. Kirk and H.-M. Chang, eds. pp. 153–167, Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann.Google Scholar
  4. Farrell, R.L. and Skerker, P.S. (1990). Eur.Pat.Appl. 0,373,107.Google Scholar
  5. Jeffries, T.W. and Lins, C.W. (1990). In: Biotechnology in Pulp and Paper Manufacture, T.K. Kirk and H.-M. Chang, eds. pp.191–201, Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann.Google Scholar
  6. Jurasek, L. and Paice, M.G. (1992).In: Proc.Int.Symp.Pollution Manufacture Pulp Paper, Washington DC, August 18–20, pp. 105–107.Google Scholar
  7. Nelson, N. (1944). J. Biol. Chem. 153, 375–380.Google Scholar
  8. Paice, M.G., Gurnagul, N., Page, D.H. and Jurasek, L. (1992). Enzyme Microb. Technol. 14, 272–276.Google Scholar
  9. Plummer, D.T. (1978). An Introduction to Practical Biochemistry, London: McGraw-Hill Book Company, Ltd.Google Scholar
  10. Somogyi, M. (1952). J. Biol. Chem. 195, 19–23.Google Scholar
  11. Turner, J.C., Skerker, P.S., Burns, B.J., Howard, J.C., Alonso, M.A. and Andres, J.L. (1992). Tappi J. 75, 83–89.Google Scholar
  12. Viikari, L., Kantelinen, A., Sundquist, J. and Linko, M. (1994). FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 13, 335–350.Google Scholar
  13. Viikari, L., Ranua, M., Kantelinen, A., Linko, M. and Sundquist, J. (1987). In: Proc. Fourth Int.Symp. Wood Pulping Chem., Paris, April 27–30, vol.1, pp. 151–154.Google Scholar
  14. Yang, J.L., Lou, G. and Eriksson, K.-E.L. (1992). Tappi J. 75, 95–101.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Chapman & Hall 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • L. P. Christov
    • 1
  • B. A. Prior
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Microbiology and BiochemistryUniversity of the Orange Free StateBloemfonteinSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations