Advertisement

Biology and Philosophy

, Volume 11, Issue 3, pp 301–320 | Cite as

A complex systems theory of teleology

  • Wayne Christensen
Article

Abstract

Part I [sections 2–4] draws out the conceptual links between modern conceptions of teleology and their Aristotelian predecessor, briefly outlines the mode of functional analysis employed to explicate teleology, and develops the notion of cybernetic organisation in order to distinguish teleonomic and teleomatic systems. Part II is concerned with arriving at a coherent notion of ‘intentional control’. Section 5 argues that intentionality is to be understood in terms of the representational properties of cybernetic systems. Following from this, section 6 argues that intentional control needs to be seen as a particular type of relationship between the system and its environment.

Key words

Complex systems cybernetics emergence functions intentionality naturalism ontology teleology teleonomy 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Beer, S.: 1989, ‘The Viable System Model: Its Provenance, Development, Methodology and Pathology’, in Espejo, R. and R. Harndon (eds.),The Viable System Model, John Wiley & Sons, New York.Google Scholar
  2. Bickhard, M.H.: 1993,Representational Content in Humans and Machines,J. Expt. Theor. Artif. Intell. 5, 285–333.Google Scholar
  3. Cam, P.: 1984, ‘Consciousness and Content-formation’,Inquiry 27, 381–397.Google Scholar
  4. Churchland, P.S.: 1986,Neurophilosophy, MIT Press, Cambridge Mass.Google Scholar
  5. Cummins, R.: 1984, ‘Functional Analysis’, in E. Sober (ed.),Conceptual Issues in Evolutionary Biology, MIT Press, Cambridge, pp. 386–407.Google Scholar
  6. Dennett, D.: 1984, ‘Cognitive Wheels: The Frame Problem of AI’, in C. Hookway (ed.),Minds, Machines and Evolution, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  7. Depew, D. and Weber, B.: 1988, ‘Consequences of Nonequilibrium Thermodynamics for the Darwinian Tradition’, in Depew, Weber, and Smith (eds.),Entropy, Information, and Evolution, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, pp. 317–354.Google Scholar
  8. Dyke, C.: 1988,The Evolutionary Dynamics of Complex Systems, Oxford U. P., New York.Google Scholar
  9. Fodor, J.: 1981,Representations, MIT Press, Cambridge Mass.Google Scholar
  10. Forster, M.R.: 1993,How Neural Networks Develop Meaningful Representations Through Learning, unpublished.Google Scholar
  11. Garfinkel, A.: 1987, ‘The Slime MoldDictyostelium as a Model of Self-Organization in Social System’, in Yates (ed.),Self-Organizing Systems, Plenum, New York.Google Scholar
  12. Gilson, E.: 1984,From Aristotle to Darwin and Back Again, Sheed & Ward Ltd., London.Google Scholar
  13. Goodwin, B.C.: 1989, ‘A Structuralist Programme in Developmental Biology’, in Goodwin, Sibatani and Webster (eds.),Dynamic Structures in Biology, Edinburgh Univ. Press, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
  14. Hahleg, K. and Hooker, C.A. (eds.): 1989,Issues in Evolutionary Epistemology, State University of New York Press, Albany.Google Scholar
  15. Hooker, C.A. et al.: 1992, ‘Towards a Theory of Cognition Under a New Control Paradigm’,Topoi 11, 71–88.Google Scholar
  16. Kauffman, S.A.: 1991, ‘Antichaos and Adaption’,Scientific American, August, pp. 64–70.Google Scholar
  17. Lloyd, D.: 1989,Simple Minds, Bradford Books, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  18. Millikan, R.: 1989, ‘Biosemantics’,The Journal of Philosophy LXXXVI.Google Scholar
  19. Nagel, E.: 1979,Teleology Revisited And Other Essays in the Philosophy and History of Science, Cniversity Press. New York.Google Scholar
  20. Neander, K.: 1991, ‘Functions as Selected Effects: The Conceptual Analyst's Defense’,Philosophy of Science 58, 168–184.Google Scholar
  21. O'Grady, R. T. and Brooks, D.: 1988, ‘Teleology and Biology’, in Depew, Weber and Smith (eds.),Entropy, Information, and Evolution, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, pp. 285–315.Google Scholar
  22. O'Shaughnessy, B.: 1986, ‘Consciousness’, in French, Uehling and Wettstein (eds.),Midwest Studies In Philosophy X, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.Google Scholar
  23. Prigogine, I. and Stengers, I.: 1984,Order Out Of Chaos, Bantam Books.Google Scholar
  24. Richards, W.: 1984, ‘Self-Consciousness and Agency’,Synthese 61, 149–171.Google Scholar
  25. Rosen, R.: 1985, ‘Organisms as Causal Systems Which Are Not Mechanisms: An Essay into the Nature of Complexity’, in R. Rosen (ed.),Theoretical Biology and Complexity, Academic Press, Inc., London.Google Scholar
  26. Shinbrot et al.: 1993, ‘Using small perturbations to control chaos’,Nature vol.363, June 1993.Google Scholar
  27. Smolensky, P.: 1988, ‘On the Proper Treatment of Connectionism’,Behavioral and Brain Science 11, 1–74.Google Scholar
  28. Sommerhoff, G.: 1950,Analytical Biology, Oxford U. P., London.Google Scholar
  29. Stillings, et al.: 1987,Cognitive Science, An Introduction, Bradford Books, The MIT Press, London.Google Scholar
  30. Ulanowicz, R. E.: 1986,Growth and Development: Ecosystems Phenomenology, Springer-Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
  31. Woodfield, A.: 1976,Teleology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Wayne Christensen
    • 1
  1. 1.Philosophy DepartmentUniversity of NewcastleAustralia

Personalised recommendations