Higher Education

, Volume 31, Issue 3, pp 341–354 | Cite as

The intention to both memorise and understand: Another approach to learning?

  • David Kember


In distinguishing deep and surface approaches, an important determinant is the intentions to understand and memorise respectively. A student adopting a surface approach does not seek understanding and, therefore, relies upon memorisation. Understanding and memorising are, then, seen as almost mutually exclusive as far as intent is concerned, although those seeking understanding may make some strategic use of memorisation for particular tasks. This paper reviews emerging evidence of an approach which combines memorising and understanding. The research has been conducted in the Asian region, and so provides part of the explanation for the “paradox” of the Asian student. There has been widespread anecdotal evidence of “rote-learning” and yet Asian students are often high achievers. Several plausible explanations for the occurrence of the approach are advanced. These include limited ability in the language of study leading to a narrow systematic pattern of study, cultural traditions respecting order and diligent study, and the need for children to learn the language characters.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Ausubel, D.P. (1968). Educational psychology. A cognitive view. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
  2. Ballard, B. and Clanchy, J. (1984). Study abroad: A manual for Asian students. Kuala Lumpur: Longmans.Google Scholar
  3. Biggs, J.B. (1978). ‘Individual and group differences in study processes’, British Journal of Educational Psychology 48, 266–279.Google Scholar
  4. Biggs, J. (1987). Student approaches to learning and studying. Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research.Google Scholar
  5. Biggs, J. (1993). ‘What do inventories of students' learning processes really measure? A theoretical review and clarification’, British Journal of Educational Psychology 63, 3–19.Google Scholar
  6. Biggs, J.B. (1994). ‘What are effective schools? Lessons from East and West’, Australian Educational Researcher 21, 19–39.Google Scholar
  7. Carrell, P. L., Devine, J.,& Eskey, D. (Eds.) (1988). Interactive approaches to second language reading. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Dunbar, R. (1988). ‘Culture-based learning problems of asian students: some implications for Australian distance educators’, ASPESA Papers 5, 10–21.Google Scholar
  9. Education Department, Hong Kong. (1989). Report of the working group set up to review language improvement measures. Hong Kong: Education Department.Google Scholar
  10. Entwistle, N. (1987). ‘A model of the teaching-learning process’, in Richardson, J.T.E., Eysenk, M.W. and Warren Piper, D. (eds.), Student learning: Research in education and cognitive psychology. Milton Keynes: SRHE and Open University Press, pp. 13–28.Google Scholar
  11. Entwistle, N.J. & Ramsden, P. (1983). Understanding student learning. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
  12. Ford, N. (1981). ‘Recent approaches to the study and teaching of effective learning in higher education’, Review of Educational Research 51, 345–377.Google Scholar
  13. Gibbs, G. (1981). Teaching students to learn: a student-centred approach. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Goodman, K. S. (1970). ‘Behind the eye: what happens in reading’, in Goodman, K. S. and Niles, O. S. (Eds.), Reading: Process and program. Urbana, Ill.: National Council of Teachers of English, pp. 3–38.Google Scholar
  15. Gow, L., Balla, J., Kember, D. and Hau, K.T. (in press). ‘Learning approaches of Chinese people: A function of socialisation processes and the context of learning?’, in Bond, M. (ed.), A handbook of Chinese psychology. Hong Kong: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Gow, L. & Kember, D. (1990). ‘Does higher education promote independent learning?’ Higher Education 19, 307–322.Google Scholar
  17. Harper, G. & Kember, D. (1989). ‘Interpretation of factor analyses from the approaches to studying inventory’, British Journal of Educational Psychology 59, 66–74.Google Scholar
  18. Hess, R.D. and Azuma, M. (1991). Cultural support for schooling: Contrasts between Japan and the United States, Educational Researcher 20, 2–8.Google Scholar
  19. Ho, D.Y.F. (1986). ‘Chinese patterns of socialisation: a critical review’, in Bond, M.H. (Ed.), The psychology of the Chinese people. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  20. International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA) (1988). Science achievement in seventeen countries: A preliminary report. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  21. Kember, D. and Gow, L. (1990). ‘Cultural specificity of approaches to study’, British Journal of Educational Psychology 60, 356–363.Google Scholar
  22. Kember, D. and Gow, L. (1991). ‘A challenge to the anecdotal stereotype of the Asian student’, Studies in Higher Education 16, 117–128.Google Scholar
  23. Kember, D. and Gow, L. (1994). ‘An examination of the interactive model of ESL reading from the perspective of approaches to studying’, Regional English Language Centre Journal 25, 1–25.Google Scholar
  24. Kember, D., Charlesworth, M., Davies, H., McKay, J. and Sivan, A. (1994). Establishing the effectiveness of educational innovations: Using the Study Process Questionnaire to show that meaningful learning occurs. Hong Kong: Action Learning Project.Google Scholar
  25. Lai, T. (1989). Effects of study strategies, orientating aids and concept maps as advance graphic organisers on learning from text. Unpublished Masters degree thesis, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.Google Scholar
  26. Luke, K.K. and Richards, J. (1981). English in Hong Kong: functions and status. Paper presented at the RELC 16th Regional Seminar: Varieties of English and their implications for English language teaching in Southeast Asia, Singapore, April 21–24.Google Scholar
  27. Marton, R, Dall'Alba, G. and Tse, K-T. (1992). The paradox of the Chinese learner. Paper given at a symposium on student learning in a cross cultural context. 4th. S.E. Asian Regional Conference, the International Association of Cross Cultural Psychology, Nepal.Google Scholar
  28. Marton, F. and Säljö, R. (1976). ‘On qualitative differences in learning, outcome and process I’, British Journal of Educational Psychology 46, 4–11.Google Scholar
  29. Medrich, E. and Griffith, J. (1992). International mathematics and science assessments: What have we learned? Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, US Department of Education.Google Scholar
  30. Norusis, M.J. (1988). SPSS-X advanced statistics guide. Chicago: SPSS.Google Scholar
  31. O'Neil, M.J. & Child, D. (1984). ‘Biggs’ SPQ: a British study of its internal structure’, British Journal of Educational Psychology 54, 228–234.Google Scholar
  32. Ramsden, P. & Entwistle, N. J. (1981). ‘Effects of academic departments on students' approaches to studying’, British Journal of Educational Psychology 51, 368–383.Google Scholar
  33. Richardson, J.T.E. (1994a). ‘Cultural specificity of approaches to studying in higher education: A literature survey’. Higher Education 27, 449–468.Google Scholar
  34. Richardson, J.T.E. (1994b). ‘Mature students in higher education: A literature survey on approaches to studying’, Studies in Higher Education 19, 309–325.Google Scholar
  35. Rumelhart, D.E. (1977). ‘Toward an interactive model of reading’, in Dornie, S. (ed.), Attention and performance. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum, pp. 573–603.Google Scholar
  36. Schmeck, R.R. (1983). ‘Learning styles of college students’, in Dillon., R. and Schmeck, R.R. (eds.), Individual differences in cognition. Volume 1. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  37. Tang, K.C.C. (1991). Effects of different assessment methods on tertiary students' approaches to studying. Unpublished Ph. D. Dissertation, University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
  38. Tang, T. (1993). ‘Inside the classroom: The students' view’, in Biggs, J.B. and Watkins, D.A. (eds.), Learning and teaching in Hong Kong: What is and what might be. Hong Kong: Faculty of Education, Hong Kong.Google Scholar
  39. Thomas, P. and Bain, J. (1984). ‘Contextual differences of learning approaches: the effects of assessments’. Human Learning 3, 227–240.Google Scholar
  40. Watkins, D. (1994). Memorising and understanding: The keys to solving the mysteries of the Chinese learner. Conference of the International Association of Applied Psychology, Madrid, 1994.Google Scholar
  41. Wittrock, M.C. (1974). ‘Learning as a generative process’, Educational Psychologist 11, 87- 95.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • David Kember
    • 1
  1. 1.Hong Kon Polytechnic UniversityHung Hom, KowloonHong Kong

Personalised recommendations