Natural Hazards

, Volume 14, Issue 2–3, pp 141–154 | Cite as

Seismic hazard maps for the U.K.

  • R. M. W. Musson
  • P. W. Winter


Past studies of seismic hazard in the U.K. that have used modern probabilistic methods of hazard assessment have been site-specific studies, mostly in connection with nuclear installations. There has been a need for general-purpose maps of seismic hazard to show relative variation of exposure within the U.K. and to give some guidance on absolute values. Such maps have now been produced, incorporating, for the first time, the wealth of new information on historical earthquakes in Britain that has been gathered over the last 15 years. The hazard calculations were undertaken using a new computer code based on the USGS program SEISRISK III, but incorporating a ‘logic tree’ approach to model variation in the input parameters (e.g. focal depth) or uncertainty in the formulation of the model (e.g. attenuation parameters). An innovative approach was taken to the formulation of seismic source zones, in which two overlapping models were employed. The first of these uses relatively broad source zones based loosely on an interpretation of seismicity and tectonics, while the second uses numerous small zones that reflect the locations of past significant earthquakes. This double approach (using the logic tree methodology) has the merit of both considering the general trend of earthquake activity as well as focusing in on known danger spots. The results show that the areas of highest hazard are western Scotland, north-western England and Wales, where the intensity with 90% probability of non-exceedance in 50 years is 6 EMS.

Key words

seismic zone models seismic hazard maps seismicity United Kingdom 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Ambraseys, N. N.: 1985, Intensity-attenuation and magnitude-intensity relationships for Northwestern European earthquakes, Eq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 13, 307–320.Google Scholar
  2. Bender, B. K. and Perkins, D. M.: 1987, SEISRISK III: A Computer Program for Seismic Hazard Estimation, USGS Bulletin 1772.Google Scholar
  3. Bender, B. and Perkins, D. M.: 1993, Treatment of parameter uncertainty and variability for a single seismic hazard map, Earthquake Spectra 9, 165–195.Google Scholar
  4. Burton, P. W.: 1993, Seismic hazard in the United Kingdom, in R. K. McGuire (ed.), The Practice of Earthquake Hazard Assessment, IASPEI, Denver, pp. 251–257.Google Scholar
  5. Burton, P. W., Musson, R. M. W. and Neilson, G.: 1984, Studies of historical British earthquakes, BGS Global Seismology Report No. 234.Google Scholar
  6. Coppersmith, K. J. and Youngs, R. R.: 1986, Capturing uncertainty in probabilitistic seismic hazard assessments within intraplate tectonic environments, Proc. Third US Nat. Conf. Eq. Eng. Charleston, Vol. 1, pp. 301–312.Google Scholar
  7. Cornell, C. A.: 1968, Engineering seismic risk analysis, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 58, 1583–1606.Google Scholar
  8. Cornell, C. A. and Vanmarcke, E. H.: 1969, The major influences on seismic risk, Proc. Fourth World Conf. Eq. Eng., Santiago, Vol. A-1, pp. 69–93.Google Scholar
  9. Dahle, A., Bungum, H. and Kvamme, L. B.: 1990, Attenuation models inferred from intraplate earthquake recordings, Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 19, 1125–1141.Google Scholar
  10. Grünthal, G. (ed.): 1993, European Macroseismic Scale 1992 (updated MSK Scale), Cahiers du Centre Européen de Géodynamique et de Séismologie No. 6, Luxembourg.Google Scholar
  11. Lilwall, R. C.: 1976, Seismicity and seismic hazard in Britain, IGS Seism. Bull. No. 4, HMSO, London.Google Scholar
  12. McGuire, F.: 1978, FRISK: Computer program for seismic risk analysis using faults as earthquake sources, US Geological Survey Open File Report 78-1007.Google Scholar
  13. Musson, R. M. W.: 1989a, Seismic hazard assessment for Fort William, BGS Seismology Report No. WL/9/39.Google Scholar
  14. Musson, R. M. W.: 1989b, Seismicity of Cornwall and Devon, BGS Global Seismology Report No. WL/89/11.Google Scholar
  15. Musson, R. M. W.: 1994, A catalogue of British earthquakes, BGS Technical Report No. WL/94/04.Google Scholar
  16. Musson, R. M. W.: 1996, The seismicity of the British Isles, Ann. Geofis. 39, 463–469.Google Scholar
  17. Musson, R. M. W., Neilson, G. and Burton, P. W.: 1990, Macroseismic reports on historical British earthquakes XIV: 22 April 1884 Colchester, BGS Seismology Report No. WL/90/33.Google Scholar
  18. Musson, R. M. W., Pappin, J., Lubkowski, Z., Booth, E. and Long, D.: 1993, U.K. Continental Shelf seismic hazard, Health and Safety Executive Report No. OTH 93 416.Google Scholar
  19. Musson, R. M. W. and Winter, P. W.: 1994, Seismic hazard methodology for a hazard map of the U.K., AEA Technology Report No. GNSR(DTI)p(93)149.Google Scholar
  20. Musson, R. M. W. and Winter, P. W.: 1994, Seismic hazard of the U.K., AEA Technology Report No. AEA/CS/16422000/ZJ745/005.Google Scholar
  21. Ove Arup: 1993, Earthquake hazard and risk in the U.K., Dept. of Environment, London.Google Scholar
  22. Principia Mechanica Ltd: 1982, British Earthquakes, PML, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  23. Soil Mechanics Ltd: 1982, Reassessment of U.K. Seismicity Data, SML Bracknell.Google Scholar
  24. Ware, J.: 1662, Rerum Hibernicarum Henrico Octavo Regnante: Annales, Crook, Dublin.Google Scholar
  25. Woo, G. and Muir Wood, R.: 1986, North Sea seismicity, Dept. of Energy Offshore Technology Report No. OTH 86 219.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. M. W. Musson
    • 1
  • P. W. Winter
    • 2
  1. 1.British Geological SurveyEdinburghU.K.
  2. 2.AEA Technology Consultancy ServicesThompson HouseRisleyU.K.

Personalised recommendations